ParchedThroatCottonMouth

Yep: http://www.giantbomb.com/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3/61-35129/why-mw2-is-better-than-mw3-a-few-items/35-526807/

@Jack268: For example, let's say, the running in MW3. It seems so much slower and in much shorter bursts. Just one example there.

@Hunkulese: Let's keep this current, and not long-term backlog.

Let's get right to it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJOpFCCnv0E - This isn't me, but I wish that my voice was this creepy to keep most of these women away from me.

1. MW3 Lag Compensation

What it does: Causes the game to be played in slo-mo to compensate for slower connections. Makes the game unbearably slow and unplayable.

2. MW3 'Sticky Bullets'

What it is: Bullets home in on your targets and stick to them. Larger, 'stickier' hitboxes. Guns are given priority over player movement.

3. Nerfed Abilities

Real Talk: You name it, what ability from MW2 isn't as effective in MW3? Frustrating.

4. 'Zombie' Following

Truth: Unfortunately, MW3 is the 'flavor of the month' right now. No one will really send a message by straying away from this game because everyone and their friend's mother's cousin's aunt's pet babysitter is playing it.

What do YOU think? What other glaring issue(s) have you encountered with MW3 that makes MW2 seem like a better game?