Something went wrong. Try again later

Pnutz83

This user has not updated recently.

102 0 0 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Pnutz83's forum posts

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Pnutz83

Aren't they dismissive against most things these days. Whenever a new big game gets released they usually clank down on it. They skew negative on most topics I think so it doesn't surprise me that they don't like the new consoles.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cyberbloke: You're asking for outright, irrefutable proof that JKR is a transphobe. Here's the thing. A lot of racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc. people are "just asking questions." They often hide behind their "concerns."

Very few of them will literally say that they are those things. Instead, they use what are referred to as "dog whistles." Oxford defines this as "a subtly aimed political message which is intended for, and can only be understood by, a particular group."

JKR has not literally come out and openly stated that she has a problem with trans people. But she sure has used a lot of language that suggests that she does. Most recently, she promoted a piece of clothing she got from a small "feminist" store. The piece of clothing she showed off was not offensive. However, that store sells a bunch of explicitly anti-trans merchandise. JKR can pretend she didn't know that. The dogs know what she really means.

But we don't know her. I hate this "judge people you don't know society" we now live in. Myself I like to judge people I have actually had an interactíon with and talked to. Not some stranger I never met. If you sat down and talked to JKR I think she would be able to explain her thoughts to you much more clearly.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Pnutz83

I stand by my original post that thoughts (except Professor X:s thoughts) can't hurt anyone. When you explicitly tell people to go and attack someone then they hurt and then they aren't just thoughts. What I meant with all the artists comparisons is that even though you might not like JKR you shouldn't punish the game makers. Try to separate the art from the artist. I mean "Mary Jane" is a good song even though Rick James sucks as a human being. "Feelin on your boooty" is great even though R. Kelly seems dispicable and The Hogwarts game can be great even though you might not agree with JKR.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Time to be the asshole here. I could not give a fuck. I love Michael Jackson, Rick James is great, R. Kelly is one of the best R'nB singers ever. Hell even Gary Glitter is great. What I am trying to say is wheter the artist is reprehensible or not doesn't matter to me. I firmly beleive that our society now a days is too sensitive. Someones thoughts can't hurt anyone. It use to be that you had to actually incite violence aginst someone or attack them for it to be called harassment but now a days it has gone too far. Mos def I'm gonna buy this game and support the people making the game.

To the mods please let me have another opinion than everyone else without being banned. In this post I haven't attacked anyone. I have just stated my opinion. That has to be allowed. Right?

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Luv the game it's fucking great. Being a marvel fan makes it even better. I love playing as Iron Man, Cap or Thor. Feels great. The fights are nice and i like how you actually have to think when you fight the bad guys and don't auto aim like you do in the Batman games.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@efesell: To me I have found that 50 hours (for a rpg) is the perfect sweet spot. More than 50h and the game gets tedious and between 15-30 hours is not enough in my book. I don't get to know the world and I don't feel like I'm on this big expansive quest. But again that is just how i feel and it actually has nothing to do with the original topic so I think we should leave it and not derail the thread.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Just so I'm clear it is rpgs that should be 50 hours. Dmc5 was great at 10 hours but big rpgs like Dragon Age and such should strive for 50 hours (in my opinion of course).

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@plan6: Sorry I have to be the asshole here but my answer to your point is: no. I wholeheartedly think that all rpgs, and I mean all of them, would be better as a 50 hour game. I hate these almost long rpgs in the range between 15-30 hours. Such a disappointment in my world. Disco Elysium to me was a super boring game so of course 50 hours of that would be super annoying.

Avatar image for pnutz83
Pnutz83

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Lets go back like 3 years we have Spiderman, God of War 2018, Ghos tof Tsushima, Tlou2, HZD and Persona 5. What do Xbox have in the same time span? I totally agree that it seems to be more AA- games from these Xbox studios and that worries me a lot. I want big beautiful AAA games as exclusives not 15 hours AA-games. The biggest problem with games like Outer Worlds was game length. To me games with rpg-elements should always strive for around 50 hours of game play, and that is hard to do with AA-games.