@neckface said:
haha this thread is insane!
To get back to the original topic, while the man may be innocent or guilty, the fact is anyone who supports the death penalty is total fucking trash.
Oh yeah, totally a fact. Not subjective or debatable at all - if they disagree with you about complicated controversial subjects, they must be trash...
The amount of subjectivity and lack of proof to back it up in this thread is amazing.
That guy had 4 trials and was found guilty in all 4 over the course of 21 years. Your best counter argument is that the witnesses supposedly recanted (source? proof?).
So basically, you think the judges dismissed real evidence on purpose?(again- proof? source?) I get a strange vibe a certain group of people wants white people from the American South to fit into some preconceived label they have.
I'm against QUICK death penalty, mostly because I believe that in a matter of life and death the accused should have more time to prove his innocence, or to show new convincing evidence. But that guy had 21 years and 4 trials to prove he's innocent, and didn't succeed.
So either he's innocent and the judges are racist and should be punished (bring REAL proof first) or that he's guilty and you should admit you've jumped into conclusions based on half-truths and self-conviction.
Log in to comment