Something went wrong. Try again later

SlashDance

This user has not updated recently.

1867 1 11 13
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

SlashDance's forum posts

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Should I get Baldur's Gate 2 Enhanced Edition or just pick up the GOG version for slightly cheaper and mod it all up?

I would say get the EE if it's your first time playing the game.

You should avoid the enhanced version of the first game because modding the entire thing into BG2's engine is a far better way to play it. For BG2, you can't really go wrong either way.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Soccer is boring, American football is boring.

I'm more of a handball guy, but any sport where stuff actually happens more than once every 30 minutes is gonna be better than fucking Soccer. Also, soccer players are assholes. The famous ones anyway...

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I just don't see how anyone could determine the size just from seeing those pictures or watching the videos.

Have a look at this, and then this. A few seconds later you can see trees on top of the first flying rock thing so it gives us an idea of its size. It's probably a few hundred meters long. From there you can extrapolate the size of the entire planet. For reference, this is what the earth looks like from the same relative distance. Even Mount Everest wouldn't appear as large as the rocks in No Man's Sky from that far. It's not just a small difference.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@curse_hawking: You can see the first planet when they leave the atmosphere at the very end of the trailer. It's just as small. The second E3 trailer also shows a few more, none of them look like actual planets. So yeah, of course this is just based on what they've shown but they've shown enough for me to be pretty confident that they're not going for realism.

And again, that's totally fine. I think it looks awesome that way.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By SlashDance

@curse_hawking said:

@slashdance said:

@curse_hawking said:

Another thing that has been said is that everything is at a 1:1 scale, so planets are the size of actual planets and the distances between celestial bodies are realistic

OBJECTION! The planets in the E3 demo/trailer are actually very tiny, and so is the distance between them. Also asteroid fields don't exist and space isn't purple.

People shouldn't expect this game to be Space Engine: The Game. It won't be.

This is based on what, assumption? I'm going off of what the developer said. I doubt he would blatantly lie about such a key feature of the game.

There's nothing unrealistic about gases in space which could appear to be purple, and there's also nothing unrealistic about binary companion planets. That said, i don't think those were binary planets, since Sean mentioned that the second body they went to in the trailer was a moon several times. I never claimed that it would be a realistic space simulator, i'm simply repeating information that's already been put out by the devs.

Gas and dust in space indeed exist, but never that densly packed. You don't fly through clouds of gas in space. Nebulae appear dense to us because we see them in long exposure photographs taken from very far away, and on a very large scale. One pixel in a typical Hubble picture of a nebula is like 5 times as large as the entire solar system, at least.

Binary planets also exist, what I'm saying is that the two planets shown in the trailer are too small and too close to each other to be realistic. That's not an assumption, you just have to look at the trailer. I mean, you can see individual rock formations from space, and even from the surface of the first planet. It's pretty obvious.

You didn't say it would be a space sim, but you did say the galaxy would be 1:1 and no matter what the devs said I think that expectation is unreasonable based on what has been shown so far. I am personally super excited to play this game but I'm just saying people shouldn't expect it to look real.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By SlashDance

@curse_hawking said:

Another thing that has been said is that everything is at a 1:1 scale, so planets are the size of actual planets and the distances between celestial bodies are realistic

OBJECTION! The planets in the E3 demo/trailer are actually very tiny, and so is the distance between them. Also asteroid fields don't exist and space isn't purple.

People shouldn't expect this game to be Space Engine: The Game. It won't be.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By SlashDance

Whatever man, he already spent 3 games beating dudes up real bad and leaving them unconscious, lying in the snow with all limbs broken. The ones that didn't die of hypothermia or internal bleeding probably ended up in a wheelchair.

Batman is an asshole.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is a very janky thread.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0