I think you're taking things way too literally. Just get rid of 'you', either using the imperative, the passive voice, or just restructuring the sentence.
I'm not sure what your objections are to this example from earlier:
Spamming a button several times after death will give one of a half dozen messages from a vampire baby.
Everything in italics is the object of the sentence; replacing it with a pronoun makes it clear we're in the third person:
It will give one of a half dozen messages from a vampire baby.
'It' is definitely in the third person, so I don't see the problem. This is the same for the example where 'you' was replaced with 'players'. As for objecting to the imperative, you could argue the imperative mood isn't really in any grammatical perspective:
I am good at the game.
You are good at the game.
He/she is good at the game.
Be good at the game.
By replacing am/are/is with the infinitive form of the verb, be, we're taking the person completely out of it. OK that's a bit tenuous: we could add 'you should' to make 'you should be good at the game' without changing the meaning, so if it's in any perspective it's in the second person. But I think most people would agree this exception is fine as it it's only second person in this indirect manner.
TL;DR they just want you to get rid of 'you'. (Or perhaps I should say they just want 'you' to be gotten rid of, or get rid of 'you'.)
EDIT - Hah, should have refreshed the page before posting - referring to the imperative as a 'neutral second person' is a good way of putting it.
Log in to comment