Something went wrong. Try again later

WalterCrunkFite

This user has not updated recently.

618 0 11 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

WalterCrunkFite's comments

Avatar image for waltercrunkfite
WalterCrunkFite

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By WalterCrunkFite

@shtinky said:

@waltercrunkfite said:

@shtinky said:

@waltercrunkfite said:

@grimluck343 said:
@waltercrunkfite said:

@shtinky: applying condescension to condescension won't encourage thoughtful discussion, I'm afraid.

I'm sorry I offended you.

You didn't, and I wasn't talking to you in this instance. Check the "@"

I wasn't being condescending at all. In other words, I was saying developers need to find a happy medium that satiates both audiences, without cutting content that people would want.

I said you need to understand that there are people that want the content that you find objectionable, and that not everyone has to suffer just for people of your disposition. But there needs to be a way to do this, which is why I proposed the idea of filter options.

I understood what you were telling me I need to understand. People want to be aroused by computer game characters? So weird to me! But, let's all say "peace!" and move on!

I apologise if it sounded harsh. But yes, it's all subjective; you have the right to an opinion to not like it. But it would be wrong to demand developers to cut the content just to suit you, that would veer towards censorship. Instead, there needs to be options that are more inclusive of people in your situation.

No problem - I was probably being overly defensive. It's just a raw subject after seeing my friend and his kids so put-off today. I am vehemently anti-censorship! I don't think anything should be cut! It's just frustrating, is all.
I wish that more deliberately arousing outfits were not the norm, but available. Like, if Quiet's cool army uniform was what she wore on the reg, then the naked options were there for those that wanted them.
Anyways, thanks for being civil.

Avatar image for waltercrunkfite
WalterCrunkFite

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@shtinky said:

@waltercrunkfite said:

@grimluck343 said:
@waltercrunkfite said:

@shtinky: applying condescension to condescension won't encourage thoughtful discussion, I'm afraid.

I'm sorry I offended you.

You didn't, and I wasn't talking to you in this instance. Check the "@"

I wasn't being condescending at all. In other words, I was saying developers need to find a happy medium that satiates both audiences, without cutting content that people would want.

I said you need to understand that there are people that want the content that you find objectionable, and that not everyone has to suffer just for people of your disposition. But there needs to be a way to do this, which is why I proposed the idea of filter options.

I understood what you were telling me I need to understand. People want to be aroused by computer game characters? So weird to me! But, let's all say "peace!" and move on!

Avatar image for waltercrunkfite
WalterCrunkFite

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@waltercrunkfite said:

@grimluck343: you missed my point. You phrased it as if the character had selected her clothing, rather than a design team drawing them with little in mind but titillation.

"How dare she"!

No I fully understand what you're trying to say. You're upset that these video game characters have large breasts that aren't properly covered to your standards. How dare they.

No, I'm upset that me, my family and friends don't want to play a game we enjoy the mechanics of, because it seems dumb to us - the aesthetic appears to have been conceived with adolescent boys in mind. Just seems like they are leaving money on the table.
It's not a question of morality.