Winsord's forum posts

Avatar image for winsord
#1 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

So they went from really generic rock, to really generic hard rock. This song is still painfully formulaic, and the lyrics are terrible; not seeing any improvement at all.

Avatar image for winsord
#2 Edited by Winsord (1531 posts) -

I play most games on whatever difficulty is above normal. My assumption would generally be that normal is the way it's expected to be played, especially games with big budgets behind them, as they tend to be tailored in a more accessible fashion. I'm usually not looking to have games be super hard, but I feel like normal typically means I can beat it without dying/losing once. There are exceptions though, genres I'm better at I gravitate towards the highest difficulties, and the opposite is true as well (e.g. Forza I start on Unbeatable, Civ VI I would start on like the second lowest difficulty).

Avatar image for winsord
#3 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

Listen to me. None of the Star Wars movies were good.

Yeah, this is pretty much how I feel. II is definitely the worst, but I don't care about any of the original trilogy either. I didn't see The Force Awakens, but I did see Rogue One, and it again was okay. I do like Swtor a whole bunch though, even if 3/8 of the character stories are really bad.

Avatar image for winsord
#4 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

Docked. I'm basically interested in the Switch in the hope that it will have both historically console and portable focused Nintendo-platform games on my TV. Fire Emblem, Pokémon, Monster Hunter, SMT, Xenoblade, etc, all available on the same console. I really don't like handhelds since I find them uncomfortable to use and don't have any use for the portability part, but the Wii U never had enough games of its own to get me to buy one. If both kinds of developers make their games for the Switch, then it will be exactly what I want it to be.

Avatar image for winsord
#5 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

Mary would be great, but I don't think that'll actually happen. Whoever it is, I hope they can adapt as quickly as Austin did!

Avatar image for winsord
#6 Edited by Winsord (1531 posts) -

I ended up having the opposite experience, I thought it was way too easy. I know there are additional challenges to do after finishing the game, but playing through the first time, the entire game took me about 80 minutes (excluding the credits) to complete. I'm not particularly amazing at shooters or anything either, it just played like a really simple puzzle game.

Avatar image for winsord
#7 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

I'm totally fine with it being allowed. If DLC/expansions manage to be better than full titles that came out the same year, then they deserve to win.

Avatar image for winsord
#8 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

Haven't had one since 2010. It's been an issue maybe twice in that time, but I can easily go rip/burn discs on another computer so it's kind of whatever.

Avatar image for winsord
#9 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

I would take fewer graphical effects and at least 900p 60FPS, ideally. I would still take 720@60 over 1080@30 though; anytime I see games running in 60FPS or higher, I always feel a big sigh of relief. 30 isn't unbearable by any means, and I'll take a stable 30 over variable 40-60 in most cases, but 60 looks and feels so much better that it's hard to ignore.

Avatar image for winsord
#10 Posted by Winsord (1531 posts) -

My upgrade menus also stutter really bad, hoping to get a fix for this one soon. It's not unbearable, but I like to spend a lot of time building cars, so it's kind of unfortunate.