@Zolkowski: I agree with the sentiment kinda, but treating a position that is based on mountains and mountains of evidence (albeit which do not give a complete picture of Life, The Universe and Everything) the same as a position which is based on no evidence at all is silly.
Being the time that it is : "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence"
I'm not implying that you should treat them on the same level, but that you should understand the other position (as well as your own) if you are going to take some sort of stance opposed to it.
Edit: Missed your ninja edit there - That's a favorite quote of mine, and I agree. For you to realize the other side has no evidence, however, still requires you to look at it and evaluate if there is any basis in such point/belief.
My first follower! I am really thankful for the notion sir! Now I have a blog to keep at, don't I?
That is pure genius. Going to have to save that quote for later :)