Sure. He works well to bring character to the more lighthearted versions of Solid Snake and Big Boss. The Solid Snake who masturbates to posters in a locker, and the Big Boss who still believes in Santa Claus and swoons over cardboard boxes shaped like tanks. He's the right guy for that stuff.
But say what you will about Sutherland, the fact is that Venom Snake just doesn't have the same aura about him that previous games gave to the overall "Snake" character. Plus MGSV is just the most self-serious and dare I say "gritty" game in the series. I don't think David Hayter's Snake would be able to fit the tone of that game, because he fits the tone of the T-rated wacky Peace Walker. And as much as I like the speech at the end of that game, his voice work on it made it slightly funny rather than entirely moving. His MGS4 voice wasn't the same as his Peace Walker voice though. One is a gravelly old man, the other is going for a more gruff soldier/commander roll; so there is some overall, but not entirely.
It makes me wonder if his delivery of "which means it's not just another nuke" wouldn't have been met with cringe, rather than acceptance. Probably cringe. Kiefer does a good job at fulfilling the roll that Venom Snake fills in MGSV; a reserved largely unremarkable soldier character. It makes even more sense in my mind since he, for the most part, is giving some voice to someone who isn't even Big Boss; the unremarkable player character. It makes sense and would be strange if the player character was voiced by David Hayter instead.
All that said, the problem people have with Venom Snake is not really the lack of Hayter, but rather the performance Venom is given in contrast to who "Snake" used to be. It wouldn't have mattered who voiced him.
@lilman1101 Nope, no it wouldn't have. Not at all. It's pretty darn clear the reason why Venom Snake is has sparse lines, and it's not because of some idea about how much voice actors cost to hire.
Log in to comment