vrkobold's The Outer Worlds (Digital) (PC) review

Avatar image for vrkobold
  • Score:
  • vrkobold wrote this review on .
  • 2 out of 2 Giant Bomb users found it helpful.
  • This review received 1 comments

A concise, engaging RPG that serves as a palatable reform, not a thorough revolution.

The Outer Worlds was my first successful foray into the world of open-world RPGs. Usually, they are simply too much game for me, and I tend to drop off once I tire of the gameplay. But when I learned that The Outer Worlds would exist at a smaller scale, I decided to climb aboard -- though I'd be lying if I said the price didn't help usher me onto the ship.

I'm glad I gave it a shot. The Outer Worlds is a game full of interesting characters, intriguing environments, and solid dialogue. From start to finish, I was primarily and forcefully propelled by my desire to explore the cities, ships, and outposts of the Outer Worlds, talk to and learn about their inhabitants, and see how they would act and react with me and with each other. I agonized over which of my crew to bring with me while I was out and about, because I wanted to know how they felt about other characters and what they thought of me. When confronted with big decisions, despite my efforts to puzzle them out, I was often surprised by the eventual consequences of my actions.

The gameplay, however, didn't interest me as much. Do note that I played on Normal, so I didn't face much in the way of challenge, but the core loop of stumbling upon a new combat arena and plunking away at enemies (or rushing them head-on) got stale quickly. Managing my inventory was a chore, as I picked up a great many items that -- while fun to look at and read about -- never mattered much. I had my battle armor, my tech clothes, my speech clothes... and a ton of other equipment that I would lose them in, as I couldn't find a good way to quickly separate the wheat from the chaff. Similarly, the skill and perk systems felt more like work than a necessary way to differentiate my character. I could see these systems mattering in a more specialized playthrough, even though I'd still be drowned in a deluge of unappetizing consumables.

I feel that broad volume of items is emblematic of the promotion of breadth over depth in The Outer Worlds. It was natural that a game in the vein of a Fallout would choose to either go wide or go deep if it needed to be concise. This isn't a firmly bad or good decision; it works to the game's detriment sometimes, but works in its favor as well. You meet many characters, hear many stories, pick up many items, and fire many bullets, and while some of those are forgettable or shallow or extraneous, you are never wanting for intrigue, never far away from the next exciting or funny conversation.

Where I feel most turbulent on this tension between breadth and depth is in how The Outer Worlds communicates its ideas, themes, and positions. It touches on and talks about many topics that are important and timely in our real world -- class struggle, workers' rights, environmentalism, reformism, anarchism, colonialism, bad-jacketing and co-option -- but doesn't explicitly say much about any of them.

I think it's good because it provides a jumping-on point for people who are new to these themes. I think it's bad because I want to better understand where it stands on them. I think it's good because it pushes the discourse towards further examination of these topics. I think it's bad because it leaves out many crucial complicating factors of these themes. I think it's at its best when these ideas are juxtaposed and compared, and at its worst when they are simply mentioned in passing, in isolation. I think the most powerful writing can be in the words left unwritten, but the most comfortable writing is that which is explicitly stated.

But mostly, I think this turbulence was the inevitable result of fitting this type of game into 30 hours, rather than 300. I met a lot of cool characters and saw a lot of neat areas, but the lack of depth meant that I didn't always get to see everything that I wanted to see... but if that depth had been offered to me, I don't think I would have had the time to comb through it all. Such is the nature of contradiction.

TL;DR: The Outer Worlds skillfully tells many stories that, while terse, are interesting and have real-world relevance. It looks and sounds great, and the gameplay doesn't get in the way. It doesn't ask for weeks of your life, but it does ask that you draw your own conclusions about its events. Worth buying at full price, and if you have Game Pass you should absolutely try it out, even if it's not your kind of game.

Other reviews for The Outer Worlds (Digital) (PC)

    Great and Refined RPG, but doesn't do much new 0

    Usually how my large RPG games like this go is I get very into them, doing everything I can, and then get burnt out and never finished. Happened this gen with Witcher 3 and Fallout 4. People are saying that it didn't happen with them on this, but honestly it still happened for me. I got to around middle of Monarch before I called it quits. I want to say about half way? I like how simple the ranking and weapons really are as well. First large part of the game there are only a handful of skills. A...

    1 out of 1 found this review helpful.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.