Review embargo?

Avatar image for sonicfire
#1 Posted by SonicFire (875 posts) -

I'm still on the fence with this game (having never enjoyed the traditional splinter cell series). But there doesn't seem to be much in the way of early reviews. Is there a hard review embargo for this one? Like, release day?

Avatar image for geno
#2 Posted by Geno (6768 posts) -

Don't think so, IGN's already released their review. 

Avatar image for ch13696
#3 Posted by ch13696 (4760 posts) -

I don't know if it's this one, but a company did put a review embargo on a game until a week after release. I guess their statement is that they want the media to enjoy it the same as the consumers.

Avatar image for steampunkjin
#4 Edited by SteamPunkJin (1283 posts) -
@Geno said:

" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "

They gave it a 9.3 - a review good enough that they were allowed to get it out before any Embargo dates were lifted. It's something to consider when they're the ONLY ones who have a review posted. 
It all looked good except near the end of the review they mention the campaign is about 5 hours long - that probably scored Ubisoft some more negative numbers from other sites/publications.
Avatar image for geno
#5 Posted by Geno (6768 posts) -
@SteamPunkJin said:
" @Geno said:

" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "

They gave it a 9.3 - a review good enough that they were allowed to get it out before any Embargo dates were lifted. It's something to consider when they're the ONLY ones who have a review posted.  It all looked good except near the end of the review they mention the campaign is about 5 hours long - that probably scored Ubisoft some more negative numbers from other sites/publications. "
But isn't an embargo a legal barricade that affects all publications? 
Avatar image for mjhealy
#6 Posted by MjHealy (1999 posts) -

I really want to see the reviews go up as I really am interested in picking this game up but I am not the biggest fan of stealth games.

Avatar image for incrediblebulk92
#7 Posted by IncredibleBulk92 (949 posts) -
@Geno said:
" @SteamPunkJin said:
" @Geno said:

" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "

They gave it a 9.3 - a review good enough that they were allowed to get it out before any Embargo dates were lifted. It's something to consider when they're the ONLY ones who have a review posted.  It all looked good except near the end of the review they mention the campaign is about 5 hours long - that probably scored Ubisoft some more negative numbers from other sites/publications. "
But isn't an embargo a legal barricade that affects all publications?  "
No, it's neither I believe.  It's more of a gentleman's agreement than a legal document.  If embargo's are broken then publishers might not give the website/publication any future access to their games.  Also embargo's are usually used to either ensure that websites don't just base reviews on screenshots and print reviews as soon as possible or in this case to give a certain website an advantage.  
Avatar image for icemael
#8 Posted by Icemael (6860 posts) -
@SteamPunkJin said:
" @Geno said:

" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "

They gave it a 9.3 - a review good enough that they were allowed to get it out before any Embargo dates were lifted. It's something to consider when they're the ONLY ones who have a review posted.  It all looked good except near the end of the review they mention the campaign is about 5 hours long - that probably scored Ubisoft some more negative numbers from other sites/publications. "
Five hours? Five hours?
 
If that's true, this is not a game I'm gonna pick up anytime soon.
Avatar image for steampunkjin
#9 Edited by SteamPunkJin (1283 posts) -
@Icemael said:

" @SteamPunkJin said:

" @Geno said:

" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "

They gave it a 9.3 - a review good enough that they were allowed to get it out before any Embargo dates were lifted. It's something to consider when they're the ONLY ones who have a review posted.  It all looked good except near the end of the review they mention the campaign is about 5 hours long - that probably scored Ubisoft some more negative numbers from other sites/publications. "
Five hours? Five hours?
 
If that's true, this is not a game I'm gonna pick up anytime soon. "
IGN third paragraph second page

 All of these new gameplay elements are quickly explained in the single-player campaign. These things are so intuitive, that the tutorial is over before you know it. The campaign is a brisk and enjoyable five-hour experience that has only two odd spots.

Avatar image for sjschmidt93
#10 Posted by SJSchmidt93 (5010 posts) -
@Geno said:
" Don't think so, IGN's already released their review.  "
They're IGN. That means nothing.
Avatar image for electricboogaloo
#11 Posted by ElectricBoogaloo (488 posts) -

Got an 8 in both EDGE and Games TM here in the UK.
 
An 8 from EDGE should be all you need to go out and buy it :P

Avatar image for icemael
#12 Posted by Icemael (6860 posts) -
@SteamPunkJin: Man, fuck that.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.