Battle Arena Toshinden
Never liked the Sony PS games...
Thanks to Gamekyo
Platform »
" @atomic_dumpling said:Virtua Fighter 5 has been out for... what? Two years? Three years? I don't see why it should still be on most people tongues. Besides, it may be deep and balanced, but that doesn't take away from the fact that its boring as hell. I play my copy for about an hour then realise that I would much rather be playing Tekken or KOF." So, a new Tekken and a new Toshinden. This is just like the old days. "And people still forgetting about Virtua Fighter 5. "
Just as bad as the old games were for their time. Nice to see they keep the tradition going.The old games had the virtue of having cutting edge graphics for the time, sort of a Crysis situation going on. The first game had better shadows than this new Toshiden has on Wii, so this version has no such distinction. Just about everyone was deceiving themselves into thinking the first Toshiden was great when it came out. Just a few years later I played the game again and I realized how god awful those controls were.
You're joking, right?" @Al3xand3r said:
Just as bad as the old games were for their time. Nice to see they keep the tradition going.The old games had the virtue of having cutting edge graphics for the time, sort of a Crysis situation going on. The first game had better shadows than this new Toshiden has on Wii, so this version has no such distinction. Just about everyone was deceiving themselves into thinking the first Toshiden was great when it came out. Just a few years later I played the game again and I realized how god awful those controls were. "
You're joking, right? Also, I'd just like to say that the most experience I had with Toshinden was the Game Boy version, which you can imagine played nothing like the Playstation titles. It was fun, but stupidly simple and of course no one else I knew had a cartridge, so I couldn't play multiplayer on it. "Absolutely not joking, why would you even think that? Yea I'd played the Gameboy version too, not even a remotely similar experience.
" @Hailinel said:The graphics in Crysis were hyped to hell and back several times over, thanks to the internet. No such hype for Toshinden existed.You're joking, right? Also, I'd just like to say that the most experience I had with Toshinden was the Game Boy version, which you can imagine played nothing like the Playstation titles. It was fun, but stupidly simple and of course no one else I knew had a cartridge, so I couldn't play multiplayer on it. "Absolutely not joking, why would you even think that? Yea I'd played the Gameboy version too, not even a remotely similar experience. "
" @Diamond said:They sold well because they are some of the only decent anime fighting games ever. Seriously, I'm no Naruto fan, but those are some fun fighting games they have made" @Hailinel said:The graphics in Crysis were hyped to hell and back several times over, thanks to the internet. No such hype for Toshinden existed. That being said, it looks like Takara Tomy is taking things in a completely different direction with this new game. None of the original characters are in it, and it appears to be a new setting. The combat is obviously disconnecting itself from anything resembling Tekken or Virtua Fighter. For all intents and purposes, the game is really Toshinden only in name, aside from the fact that it's a weapon-based fighting game. As for why the Wii, Tomy's Naruto fighting games on the GameCube and Wii have been fairly successful sellers as far as I know, so maybe that's the audience they're going for. "You're joking, right? Also, I'd just like to say that the most experience I had with Toshinden was the Game Boy version, which you can imagine played nothing like the Playstation titles. It was fun, but stupidly simple and of course no one else I knew had a cartridge, so I couldn't play multiplayer on it. "Absolutely not joking, why would you even think that? Yea I'd played the Gameboy version too, not even a remotely similar experience. "
The graphics in Crysis were hyped to hell and back several times over, thanks to the internet. No such hype for Toshinden existed.It was all about gaming magazines and word of mouth with Toshinden. Every game magazine I read at the time was saying how great the game was, it would have been probably ~90% metacritic by today's standards. There was definitely game hype before the internet, it just wasn't as uniform or widespread.
That being said, it looks like Takara Tomy is taking things in a completely different direction with this new game. None of the original characters are in it, and it appears to be a new setting. The combat is obviously disconnecting itself from anything resembling Tekken or Virtua Fighter. For all intents and purposes, the game is really Toshinden only in name, aside from the fact that it's a weapon-based fighting game. As for why the Wii, Tomy's Naruto fighting games on the GameCube and Wii have been fairly successful sellers as far as I know, so maybe that's the audience they're going for.Yea, it's definitely not 'Toshiden' anymore. I don't know if there's any merit to what they're making, and straying from the traditional 2D or 3D fighting game mechanics has always been discouraged by most of the gaming community.
" @Hailinel said:Then again, maybe Toshinden needs a clean break to regain its relevance. No one certainly seems to take the old games seriously anymore.The graphics in Crysis were hyped to hell and back several times over, thanks to the internet. No such hype for Toshinden existed.It was all about gaming magazines and word of mouth with Toshinden. Every game magazine I read at the time was saying how great the game was, it would have been probably ~90% metacritic by today's standards. There was definitely game hype before the internet, it just wasn't as uniform or widespread.
@Hailinel said:That being said, it looks like Takara Tomy is taking things in a completely different direction with this new game. None of the original characters are in it, and it appears to be a new setting. The combat is obviously disconnecting itself from anything resembling Tekken or Virtua Fighter. For all intents and purposes, the game is really Toshinden only in name, aside from the fact that it's a weapon-based fighting game. As for why the Wii, Tomy's Naruto fighting games on the GameCube and Wii have been fairly successful sellers as far as I know, so maybe that's the audience they're going for.Yea, it's definitely not 'Toshiden' anymore. I don't know if there's any merit to what they're making, and straying from the traditional 2D or 3D fighting game mechanics has always been discouraged by most of the gaming community. "
I thought they looked pretty bad back then too. Virtua Fighter 2 came out the same year and was miles better, while Toshinden 2 later didn't even come close to it. The Toshinden games were waaaay too slow also. Visually the first didn't look much beyond the first Virtua Fighter which was out a year earlier and was probably (one of?) the first 3D fighter(s). Maybe it had better lighting. Virtua Fighter was faster and more fluid than Toshinden. I had no idea the franchise was praised for anything, even something as superficial as the visuals, I thought it was mediocre in every way." @Al3xand3r said:
The old games had the virtue of having cutting edge graphics for the time, sort of a Crysis situation going on. The first game had better shadows than this new Toshiden has on Wii, so this version has no such distinction. Just about everyone was deceiving themselves into thinking the first Toshiden was great when it came out. Just a few years later I played the game again and I realized how god awful those controls were. "Just as bad as the old games were for their time. Nice to see they keep the tradition going.
I never play any of these games, but judging by some of the responds, it was a pretty obscure series.
Now, if it's possible for a company to bring back an obscure fighting game series, then maybe there's hope for a new Bloody Roar game.
Well, I dug out an old german magazine (Video Games, issue 1/96) which includes reviews of both Virtual Fighter 2 (Sega Saturn) and Toshinden S (Sega Saturn). Let's take a look-see.
VF2 get's 90% (back then 90+ still meant something). The reviewer praises the graphics, saying they are "fantastically animated" , there are no flickering sprites or other glitches (p. 37). Apparently it ran at 60 FPS which was quite impressive in 1996.
Now, Toshinden S gets "only" 86%. Sadly, the reviewer talks a lot about the differences between the PSX and the Saturn version and says next to nothing about the game itself (p. 86). According to this, the Saturn version is technically worse, but has a new character (Cupido) and quicker Quick-Kicks and Quick-Slashes (whatever that might be).
I thought they looked pretty bad back then too. Virtua Fighter 2 came out the same year and was miles better, while Toshinden 2 later didn't even come close to it. The Toshinden games were waaaay too slow also. Visually the first didn't look much beyond the first Virtua Fighter which was out a year earlier and was probably (one of?) the first 3D fighter(s). Maybe it had better lighting. Virtua Fighter was faster and more fluid than Toshinden. I had no idea the franchise was praised for anything, even something as superficial as the visuals, I thought it was mediocre in every way.No doubt arcade stuff looked way better back then, arcades still had the best looking games around. Nothing on consoles or PC could rival arcade hardware until Model 3 was old. To me Toshiden was definitely the best looking fighting game you could have in the home when it was new. Virtua Fighter 2 on Saturn a bit later was a decent port, and it looked very good, in different ways. Toshiden had lots of nice gouraud shading and transparency effects, and Toshinden 2 did add some primitive lighting and more dynamic shadow techniques. VF2 on Saturn was all about the 60Hz, higher resolution rendering, and sharp character textures.
Probably because you try to mash buttons to win." @Godwind said:
" @atomic_dumpling said:Virtua Fighter 5 has been out for... what? Two years? Three years? I don't see why it should still be on most people tongues. Besides, it may be deep and balanced, but that doesn't take away from the fact that its boring as hell. I play my copy for about an hour then realise that I would much rather be playing Tekken or KOF. "" So, a new Tekken and a new Toshinden. This is just like the old days. "And people still forgetting about Virtua Fighter 5. "
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment