Joseph Anderson is fantastic, I find myself agreeing with his takes almost always, and does a great job of breaking down critically and surgically what I find other critics describe nebulously as "bad gameplay" or some tired buzzwords. His takes on Dragon's Dogma, breaking down why the battle system is fucked, for example, is spot on and told with a precise style that I appreciate. His endorsement of Edith Finch made me check it out (if you haven't played it, do that, and then watch his great review), and I realized it had been a really long time since I had enjoyed a game as much, and I really doubt I would have played or stuck with it if not for his recommendation. All that said, I think he's shifted away from that style of produced critque on youtube and does twitch streams now.
SuperBunnyHop also does a great job for some of the same reasons, though isn't really as incisive as Anderson.
A month ago I would have said Tim Rogers, but he's doing his own thing right now and has sorta gone dark I guess - Anyway he quit Kotaku. He is relentlessly positive about almost all games, but I mostly just enjoy his bizarre takes and his commentary. Very few gamesmen are able to cultivate their own *really* unique personality, he is sort of the anti-Dan as far as his gaming tastes but I will pretty much watch either of them read a phone book (Vinny is the same way, but he's already at GB!).
Log in to comment