I don't know how notorious Quantserve is, but I for one don't like Doubleclick at all.
Giantbomb is in bed with Doubleclick and Quantserve?
Really? If so, I still don't give a crap. Jeff can know where I live and thumb through my mail for all I care.
NoScript is only picking up quantserve, which seems to be on a lot of sites that the owners don't know about having. I would assume that it's either something on the user's end, or something to do with files that users upload. Also: guys, use noscript if you have firefox. Seriously. Just do it.
The image is what it's showing right after clearing my cookies out. Forgive the .jpg artifacts, I rushed it.
I'm guessing Quantserve is related to Quantcast, who measure their traffic statistics. As for doubleclick, I dunno.
Really don't care. Well, maybe it's because I'm not afraid of them looking at my nonexistent porn collection. I also don't think that GB had much of a hand in this, or is getting money from it. Like Jeff said earlier, when advertisements do come, they aren't going to be subliminal; you'll know what they are. Lastly, on the front page it says "help GB through an ad-free E3".
"@lordofultima said:That's the silliest thing I've read on the internet this morning. Granted I've been up only an hour. "" The real question...Why do I care if people know what webpages I'm looking at? "
"@Alexander said:"@lordofultima said:That's the silliest thing I've read on the internet this morning. Granted I've been up only an hour. "" The real question...Why do I care if people know what webpages I'm looking at? "So I'm sure I'll get equally insulted, but I don't see why I should care either. Why should I care?"
Essentially by saying that you wouldn't have an issue with making everyone's internet activity a public record. If you stopped to think about the implications of that for two minutes (or maybe a bit more) then you might think differently.
Now what was said may have been specifically at stat tracking and ad services on the web, but I read the statement to be more general and as a general statement I found it to be silly. Maybe I was a bit off to read it as a general statement.
If such a sentiment is one you hold dear, then I'll tell you that it's quite a silly one to have while reminding you ever so gently that I'm not trying to insult you; while you may think silly things you're not necessarily a silly person.
I was not being insulting and I'm pretty sure loltima didn't take it that way. At least I hope not. I guess I could have substituted what I said for "I strongly disagree", but I guess I didn't fully think it through.
Essentially by saying that you wouldn't have an issue with making everyone's internet activity a public record. If you stopped to think about the implications of that for two minutes (or maybe a bit more) then you might think differently.
Now what was said may have been specifically at stat tracking and ad services on the web, but I read the statement to be more general and as a general statement I found it to be silly. Maybe I was a bit off to read it as a genera statement.
If such a sentiment is one you hold dear, then I'll tell you that it's quite a silly one to have while reminding you ever so gently that I'm not trying to insult you; while you may think silly things you're not necessarily a silly person. "
I know that one of the tag lines during Giant Bomb @ E3 is 'Support Giant Bomb during an ad-free E3' which I don't really understand. Giant Bomb should have banner ads, I've got nothing against them. And of course for those that do Giant Bomb should offer some kind of premium access (like gamespot total access) that removes the ads for a small fee.
Ehhh is this not just so that advertisers can look at what kind of audience is on the site so that they can decide if starting an advertisement campaign on it will be worth it? Are there sites that do not do this?
Did you know that the average Giant Bomb users is 165 times more likely to visit Kotaku compared to the average internet user?
Also a lot of people like fightersgeneration.com apparently.
"@Drebin_893 said:I was not being insulting and I'm pretty sure loltima didn't take it that way. At least I hope not. I guess I could have substituted what I said for "I strongly disagree", but I guess I didn't fully think it through. [edit] well really I did, I just didn't figure someone would misconstrue what I was saying."@Alexander said:"@lordofultima said:That's the silliest thing I've read on the internet this morning. Granted I've been up only an hour. "" The real question...Why do I care if people know what webpages I'm looking at? "So I'm sure I'll get equally insulted, but I don't see why I should care either. Why should I care?"
Essentially by saying that you wouldn't have an issue with making everyone's internet activity a public record. If you stopped to think about the implications of that for two minutes (or maybe a bit more) then you might think differently.
Now what was said may have been specifically at stat tracking and ad services on the web, but I read the statement to be more general and as a general statement I found it to be silly. Maybe I was a bit off to read it as a general statement.
If such a sentiment is one you hold dear, then I'll tell you that it's quite a silly one to have while reminding you ever so gently that I'm not trying to insult you; while you may think silly things you're not necessarily a silly person. "
Isnt this covered in http://www.giantbomb.com/privacy/ under Advertisers' Cookies section? However I am unaware of how unscrupulous this advertise technology may be so thanks for the heads up anyway. I have nothing to hide but that doesnt give the right for certain companies to see what I am doing, thats how I see it. I also dont feel the GiantBomb admins dont mean to harm us in anyway.
On a kinda unrelated note there is an opt-out cookie by Google to op-out of their advertisement scheme. Link here
I heard from a friend of a friend of a friend of a German baker who works down the street from the Giant Bomb offices that Giant Bomb was actually caught in some compromising positions with Keith David, Oprah Winfrey, a Buick, thirteen jalepenos, Aunt Jamima, and the entire Chicago Symphony Orchestra. Scandalous!
i look at lolcats all day long when im not using giantbomb. What kind of market can they squeeze me into?
"@Sparky_Buzzsaw said:Yeah you're right." I heard from a friend of a friend of a friend of a German baker who works down the street from the Giant Bomb offices that Giant Bomb was actually caught in some compromising positions with Keith David, Oprah Winfrey, a Buick, thirteen jalepenos, Aunt Jamima, and the entire Chicago Symphony Orchestra. Scandalous! "The only difference, the ONLY difference, is that we can prove you get Doubleclick and Quantserve cookies from GB, and what you said is totally not provable.Fuck off."
I have a little over a TB and still don't care if they look at it. That being said, it is pretty easy to protect yourself.
" So if Giantbomb were to eventually advertise something, it'd advertise tranny porn and hentai. "
" I'm a NoScript -user and feel sometimes bad about it. Especially on sites like this who probably need all those ads. :| "
Mayber it's just me, but I thought the site actually makes its business policy fairly clearly if you just look for it, just click the bit that says advertise at the bottom of the site. I prefer the site's advertising this way, and actually find the quantcast stats pretty interesting; however I do understand the fear of privacy abuses, but just check the privacy policies to see what they are aren't allowed to do with your data. It's not like the government are keeping tabs on you to arrest you for buying copies of the anarchist's cookbook and the communist manifesto of Amazon (if it was I'd have been arrested)
For what it's worth, we use Google to serve ads when we serve them. They acquired DoubleClick a while back. I'm sure Google has integrated some of DoubleClick's technology into their ad platform, which I assume is why you're seeing DoubleClick cookies when you go to our site. I'd imagine (although I haven't looked to be 100% certain) that doing any search on google.com would also leave a DoubleClick cookie.
" For what it's worth, we use Google to serve ads when we serve them. They acquired DoubleClick a while back. I'm sure Google has integrated some of DoubleClick's technology into their ad platform, which I assume is why you're seeing DoubleClick cookies when you go to our site. I'd imagine (although I haven't looked to be 100% certain) that doing any search on google.com would also leave a DoubleClick cookie.And as someone mentioned above, QuantServe is from QuantCast, which we use to measure the site traffic."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment