I don't get it, shouldn't we expect wii games to have as good graphics as 360 and ps3 games? Because honestly now, the wii costs more than the X360....
What's the wii's pass?
Shouldn't we expect the wii to have as good graphics as ps3/360
The Wii is still by far the top selling console of this generation, so apparently it doesn't matter. Also, the appeal of the Wii to most people (casual gamers) is the accessibility and novelty of it, not so much the graphics or anything that "core" gamers usually care about. It may be a different story now that Sony and Microsoft are implementing some of the same ideas into their consoles, though.
"I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360?
There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now.
Yeah, when the 360 had its price cut, the Wii should have magically been upgraded. Awesome logic right there. Nintendo is not desperate, thus no price cut yet. Thx. Would it matter to you anyway? You aren't going to buy one even if it costs $100. And if you already have one you don't use, shouldn't you be glad its retail value hasn't degraded? You can sell it without losing much still. Hurray?
"Yeah, when the 360 had its price cut, the Wii should have magically been upgraded. Awesome logic right there."
"@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
I don't think we should expect better graphics, graphics by themselves don't make great games. We should expect better games for the Wii. Which IMO has the highest crap to quality ratio of any console thus far created. I play a LOT of Wii games, almost as if I was a games journalist reviewing Wii games because I have 3 sons and I ship one crappy game after another from Gamefly just to find the 10 or so games worth buying for them on the Wii.
So how about doing better research than blindlingly taking games off the shelves in search of the good stuff? 10 to 1 sounds pretty sweet considering the amount of games on the Wii anyway. Sounds like there's tons of good games to find after all :)
PS: PS1&2 and the PC still have higher crap to good ratio. Except sites actually covered the good games for those so you could find them easier.
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
"@Knives said:Oh, and I completely understand. But I guess it boils down to this-- why does the wii get a free pass on having weak hardware despite having a similar price? ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Does it really get a free pass? Do gaming enthusiasts really consider the Wii an equal to HD gaming platforms? ""@Knives said:Oh, and I completely understand. But I guess it boils down to this-- why does the wii get a free pass on having weak hardware despite having a similar price? ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
Well, sort of, yea. Conduit looks like crap yet it gets hype...for its graphics.
They sure do Knives, aren't you one? So am I! I don't care about what some pretentious fucks come up with to put it down, all I care about is games, of which there's plenty on any system, and I don't have time to waste making threads about how much those I like less than others suck just to validate my choices and feel confident I own the cool underdog or some weird shit like that. I'd rather go play something instead.
Haze and Too Human had tons of hype too, yet were shite Smug. What, they didn't have enough hands-on time to realise that before release? Bullshit, then they shouldn't have been confident enough to praise them beforehand if that was the case. I wonder which will turn out better.
"Well, sort of, yea. Conduit looks like crap yet it gets hype...for its graphics."Say what you want about NIntendo Power, they did say the Conduit was the best FPS on the WIi in their review. And I don't think you can blame people for hyping The Conduit considering the amount of talk High Voltage has put up around their game. If it fails to meet expectations, so be it. Nobody will take High Voltage seriously again.
"They sure do Knives, aren't you one? So am I! I don't care about what some pretentious fucks come up with to put it down, all I care about is games, of which there's plenty on any system, and I don't have time to waste making threads about how much those I like less than others suck just to validate my choices and feel confident I own the cool underdog or some weird shit like that. I'd rather go play something instead."
Growing my e-penis one post at a time.
You win what exactly? You basically admit you're only making threads to troll, sometimes the Wii, other times the PS3? It's obvious anyway. I just figured using "strong" language like you do about the Wii would finally make you reveal it yourself. It worked. Thx for making it easy.
"You win what exactly? Basically admitting you're only making threads to troll, sometimes the Wii, other times the PS3? It's obvious anyway."
Well, even though I say it rather bluntly and charged, the truth is, at the price points they're at, the wii should be able to have 360 graphics. The wii is hugely overpriced at this point.
"@Al3xand3r said:Well, even though I say it rather bluntly and charged, the truth is, at the price points they're at, the wii should be able to have 360 graphics. The wii is hugely overpriced at this point. ""You win what exactly? Basically admitting you're only making threads to troll, sometimes the Wii, other times the PS3? It's obvious anyway."
What did you forget to bring this up before the Wii launched?
You know I thought you might have a brain in your head when you praised Natal. So much for that thought.
Btw the Wii doesn't get a pass, people just like the motion controls enough not to care. Same with the DS, they like the newness of it, some people are sick of regular controls.
"What did you forget to bring this up before the Wii launched? You know I thought you might have a brain in your head when you praised Natal. So much for that thought. Btw the Wii doesn't get a pass, people just like the motion controls enough not to care. Same with the DS, they like the newness of it, some people are sick of regular controls."
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Maybe, maybe not. Alexander doesn't speak for the gaming community. The opinion that the WIi is worth a damn is a minority one, at best. I don't think the price-point argument is fair. And I don't think the Wii's popularity is a good reason to dislike the system, even if most Wii owners like it or bought it for the wrong reasons. The fact remains that more people continue to buy the Wii at $250 than they buy the Xbox360 at $200. Shit, I don't even want to buy an Xbox360 for $200. And that's the only console/handheld I don't own. Of all the consoles that shouldn't get a pass, it's the Xbox360. Where are the games? The Xbox360 hasn't had a worthwhile exclusive since 2008. ""@Al3xand3r said:Well, even though I say it rather bluntly and charged, the truth is, at the price points they're at, the wii should be able to have 360 graphics. The wii is hugely overpriced at this point. ""You win what exactly? Basically admitting you're only making threads to troll, sometimes the Wii, other times the PS3? It's obvious anyway."
And as for that, dang, you must not like jrpgs-- star ocean or rtses- halo wars. But other than that, I'd actually agree. Some worth playing ones like Ninja Blade and whatnot, but nothing great. That being said, there's something the wii doesn't have-- multiplatform games. Believe it or not, against the idea of the internet, they're just as enjoyable as non exclusive titles. And with all that, it's mid year, usually we only see 5 or so worthwhile games in all by now. There's been many more. This fall and into 2010 though, if you really value exclusives so highly you'll be damn well pleased.
"The PS2 was more expensive than the GameCube and Xbox, but both had better graphics than the PS2."
Has the Wii had a worthwhile game since 2008? February was the month if I remember. And as for that, dang, you must not like jrpgs-- star ocean. But other than that, I'd actually agree. Some worth playing ones like Ninja Blade and whatnot, but nothing great. That being said, there's something the wii doesn't have-- multiplatform games. Believe it or not, against the idea of the internet, they're just as enjoyable as non exclusive titles. And with all that, it's mid year, usually we only see 5 or so worthwhile games in all by now. There's been many more. This fall and into 2010 though, if you really value exclusives so highly you'll be damn well pleased. "
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Punch-Out!! First Wii game to get 5-stars on Giantbomb. ""@Knives said:Has the Wii had a worthwhile game since 2008? February was the month if I remember. And as for that, dang, you must not like jrpgs-- star ocean. But other than that, I'd actually agree. Some worth playing ones like Ninja Blade and whatnot, but nothing great. That being said, there's something the wii doesn't have-- multiplatform games. Believe it or not, against the idea of the internet, they're just as enjoyable as non exclusive titles. And with all that, it's mid year, usually we only see 5 or so worthwhile games in all by now. There's been many more. This fall and into 2010 though, if you really value exclusives so highly you'll be damn well pleased. ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Maybe, maybe not. Alexander doesn't speak for the gaming community. The opinion that the WIi is worth a damn is a minority one, at best. I don't think the price-point argument is fair. And I don't think the Wii's popularity is a good reason to dislike the system, even if most Wii owners like it or bought it for the wrong reasons. The fact remains that more people continue to buy the Wii at $250 than they buy the Xbox360 at $200. Shit, I don't even want to buy an Xbox360 for $200. And that's the only console/handheld I don't own. Of all the consoles that shouldn't get a pass, it's the Xbox360. Where are the games? The Xbox360 hasn't had a worthwhile exclusive since 2008. ""@Al3xand3r said:Well, even though I say it rather bluntly and charged, the truth is, at the price points they're at, the wii should be able to have 360 graphics. The wii is hugely overpriced at this point. ""You win what exactly? Basically admitting you're only making threads to troll, sometimes the Wii, other times the PS3? It's obvious anyway."
"@Asurastrike said:They were all in the same ballpark though. ""The PS2 was more expensive than the GameCube and Xbox, but both had better graphics than the PS2."
The Wii is in a different ballpark, playing a different game. Thus there are no expectations that it would have the same graphics/processing power of that of the 360 or PS3. Its in a whole different category.
"@freakin said:Wait, so do people actually like the motion controls? If so, yea, that'd be a thread changer. ""What did you forget to bring this up before the Wii launched? You know I thought you might have a brain in your head when you praised Natal. So much for that thought. Btw the Wii doesn't get a pass, people just like the motion controls enough not to care. Same with the DS, they like the newness of it, some people are sick of regular controls."
Liked, sure, but I think if people were satisfied the Motion Plus wouldn't be coming out and previous to that the Wii Board.
"@SmugDarkLoser said:You just screwed your own argument here.The Wii is in a different ballpark, playing a different game. Thus there are no expectations that it would have the same graphics/processing power of that of the 360 or PS3. Its in a whole different category. ""@Asurastrike said:They were all in the same ballpark though. ""The PS2 was more expensive than the GameCube and Xbox, but both had better graphics than the PS2."
Anyway, so essentially it's $50 more and then a trade off, talking about hardware here, waggle for processing? Hmm... considering waggle sucks....
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Liked, sure, but I think if people were satisfied the Motion Plus wouldn't be coming out and previous to that the Wii Board. ""@freakin said:Wait, so do people actually like the motion controls? If so, yea, that'd be a thread changer. ""What did you forget to bring this up before the Wii launched? You know I thought you might have a brain in your head when you praised Natal. So much for that thought. Btw the Wii doesn't get a pass, people just like the motion controls enough not to care. Same with the DS, they like the newness of it, some people are sick of regular controls."
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
"@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
"@freakin said:You are wrong there, the balance board and motion plus weren't created because people were unsatisfied, but rather because it is a way to justify pricing a game above 100 dollars. ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Liked, sure, but I think if people were satisfied the Motion Plus wouldn't be coming out and previous to that the Wii Board. ""@freakin said:Wait, so do people actually like the motion controls? If so, yea, that'd be a thread changer. ""What did you forget to bring this up before the Wii launched? You know I thought you might have a brain in your head when you praised Natal. So much for that thought. Btw the Wii doesn't get a pass, people just like the motion controls enough not to care. Same with the DS, they like the newness of it, some people are sick of regular controls."
You can make that argument for the Balance board, since it being added to a lot of games is more a byproduct of Wii Fit's success, the Motion Plus only exists to improve the original functionality of the Wii wand.
"@Al3xand3r said:And i win.Growing my e-penis one post at a time. ""They sure do Knives, aren't you one? So am I! I don't care about what some pretentious fucks come up with to put it down, all I care about is games, of which there's plenty on any system, and I don't have time to waste making threads about how much those I like less than others suck just to validate my choices and feel confident I own the cool underdog or some weird shit like that. I'd rather go play something instead."
Also, I don't blindly pull games off a shelf, but the reality is there aren't that many places to look that review games in a way that would benefit me in my purpose. I'm looking for games that a 4, 6 and 8 year old would be interested in and play. Giantbomb while I love it isn't catering to that market and shouldn't. So I play a lot of games and the vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap. No matter what your age, just pure meritless crap.
"@Knives said:Yeah, when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you can fall back on "Super Mario/Zelda/Metroid Rehash" game-X that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
" I think there is a difference between thinking the Wii is stupid and thinking that it could/should be better. Hell yeah, I want HD graphics, and Motion+ should've been there from the start. It could be a better system, but so could the Xbox360 and PS3, which is why they've announced their own motion control. I still enjoy playing game on my Wii, I'm still looking forward to new games coming out later this year and in 2010.But his "Wii is stupid" argument, is in fact stupid. By his logic, Persona 3 and 4 are bad games because they're on the PS2."
The wii is to gaming what netbooks are to computing. Simple. Mainstream. Lacking. Easily ignored.
I think I'm with the troll on this one.
" @Al3xand3r: Reread my post sir. I didn't say 10 to 1 crap to good ratio, I said 10 good games period. Out of a massive library. Granted that was a bit of an exaggeration but only a bit. The problem is Nintendo really doesn't give a damn if a game is good as long as they get paid. That is a detriment to the system. Also, I don't blindly pull games off a shelf, but the reality is there aren't that many places to look that review games in a way that would benefit me in my purpose. I'm looking for games that a 4, 6 and 8 year old would be interested in and play. Giantbomb while I love it isn't catering to that market and shouldn't. So I play a lot of games and the vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap. No matter what your age, just pure meritless crap. "
"@DryPenguin said:So, OK! Let's try to get some numbers going. "vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap". How about 99%, that sound good? 99% of Wii games are crap. There are currently 90 titles on Gamerankings with a 75% or higher rating. A fair place to start no? That would mean the Wii has over 9000 games! I didn't know it had that many.." @Al3xand3r: Reread my post sir. I didn't say 10 to 1 crap to good ratio, I said 10 good games period. Out of a massive library. Granted that was a bit of an exaggeration but only a bit. The problem is Nintendo really doesn't give a damn if a game is good as long as they get paid. That is a detriment to the system. Also, I don't blindly pull games off a shelf, but the reality is there aren't that many places to look that review games in a way that would benefit me in my purpose. I'm looking for games that a 4, 6 and 8 year old would be interested in and play. Giantbomb while I love it isn't catering to that market and shouldn't. So I play a lot of games and the vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap. No matter what your age, just pure meritless crap. "
"
"@Knives said:To be fair, 75% is pretty generous. How many are there with a gamerankings of above 80? ""@DryPenguin said:So, OK! Let's try to get some numbers going. "vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap". How about 99%, that sound good? 99% of Wii games are crap. There are currently 90 titles on Gamerankings with a 75% or higher rating. A fair place to start no? That would mean the Wii has over 9000 games! I didn't know it had that many.." @Al3xand3r: Reread my post sir. I didn't say 10 to 1 crap to good ratio, I said 10 good games period. Out of a massive library. Granted that was a bit of an exaggeration but only a bit. The problem is Nintendo really doesn't give a damn if a game is good as long as they get paid. That is a detriment to the system. Also, I don't blindly pull games off a shelf, but the reality is there aren't that many places to look that review games in a way that would benefit me in my purpose. I'm looking for games that a 4, 6 and 8 year old would be interested in and play. Giantbomb while I love it isn't catering to that market and shouldn't. So I play a lot of games and the vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap. No matter what your age, just pure meritless crap. "
"
"@AgentJ said:55. ""@Knives said:To be fair, 75% is pretty generous. How many are there with a gamerankings of above 80? ""@DryPenguin said:So, OK! Let's try to get some numbers going. "vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap". How about 99%, that sound good? 99% of Wii games are crap. There are currently 90 titles on Gamerankings with a 75% or higher rating. A fair place to start no? That would mean the Wii has over 9000 games! I didn't know it had that many.." @Al3xand3r: Reread my post sir. I didn't say 10 to 1 crap to good ratio, I said 10 good games period. Out of a massive library. Granted that was a bit of an exaggeration but only a bit. The problem is Nintendo really doesn't give a damn if a game is good as long as they get paid. That is a detriment to the system. Also, I don't blindly pull games off a shelf, but the reality is there aren't that many places to look that review games in a way that would benefit me in my purpose. I'm looking for games that a 4, 6 and 8 year old would be interested in and play. Giantbomb while I love it isn't catering to that market and shouldn't. So I play a lot of games and the vast vast vast, VAST mega majority of Wii titles are crap. No matter what your age, just pure meritless crap. "
"
Especially in a post where you quoted me saying "I am looking for games for my kids and games journalism doesn't cater to my needs as a father"? Really?
Question Knives, did you read my post and care to give a well thought out answer or did you just want to defend your console to the death? Because honestly, I don't really care that much to get into a flame war with a fanboi. Get back at me
Seriously? You care about Gamerankings? wow
"@Asurastrike said:Comments like this dissapoint me. They come out with something new almost once a year, and those games usually get great reviews, but no one buys them. Elite Beat Agents. Pikmin. Excite Truck. Legend of Starfy. Advance Wars. Battalion Wars."@Knives said:Yeah, when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you can fall back on "Super Mario/Zelda/Metroid Rehash" game-X that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@SmugDarkLoser said:Because it's not the hardware that matters, it's the content. People buy Wii's for NIntendo games and you're not going to find Nintendo games anywhere else. So when "Super HD Blockbuster" game-X inevitably disappoints you, you have another console to turn to that's not all about polygons and stale voice acting. ""@PureRok said:Why shouldn't we expect the wii be as powerful as the other consoles if it costs more than the 360? There's no reason it should cost $250 and be so weak now. ""I don't get the logic behind this. "It costs more, so it must be better." is extremely flawed logic."
Anyway, everyone, just buy whatever the hell you want. Who gives a crap?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment