None of them; at least for awhile. Both Microsoft and Sony have the money to outlast the storm, and Nintendo is a non-factor, though they may be dead in the eyes of some hardcore gamers. If you remember, the Xbox and Gamecube did abysmally compared to the PS2, but it didn't drive either company away. I even believe Microsoft planned their first console to fail. It was really more of a testing the waters sort of thing. Contrast that with the PS3, today, and you already see the PS3 doing spectacular in Japan and much better than before here, largely in part due to necessary price drops and amazing games this year.
Though if I'd be concerned about anyone, it would be Microsoft. They're still doing great now, but their reliance on buying out the competition (for example: GTA DLC exclusivity) can't last forever. And once people either start utilizing the PS3 technical prowess (probably not going to happen in it's lifetime) or the next PS3 is released with more standard architecture, Microsoft won't have that huge advantage of ease of programming. Without it, the PS3 is pretty much hands down the better console.
Of course, on the software side, I was almost willing to give it to Sony. However, after thinking about it, the biggest games that come to mind don't really seem like they can be iterated on for much longer. LittleBigPlanet, which seems a really awesome game to me, but held back in its potential to where it never really took off. Uncharted 2: looks like a simply amazing game, and the definition of a system seller, but the formula honestly can't last for much more than one more game before seeming repetitive, unless releases are spaced much further apart. Final Fantasy XIII: not completely exclusive, but pretty much leading the PS3; I just don't see it hitting as big as you'd expect a Final Fantasy game to, and I think the brand is going to lose a lot of traction for the future, seeing how much ire the JRPG is bringing with it on these shores.
But I guess you could say the same thing about Microsoft and Nintendo. Gears 3, Halo Reach, Fable 3... they're all pretty much the end of the line for those series. They may keep going with them, but I'm not sure I'd be interested in even a Gears of War 3, let alone a 4th one. Nintendo has milked their franchises to the point where I actively hate most of them. If there's one company that needs innovation in software, it's Nintendo. It's amazing to me, because they've got some of the brightest guys working on these first-party Nintendo games, but they either don't "get it" or are just in it for the money, because I swear to God, if I see another side-scrolling, metroidvania style Castlevania game, or another 2D-esque Mario game based off the same games from the past, or another Animal Crossing game that isn't drastically different than all 3 of the same games they've released so far (Wild World might almost be acceptable enough, but it doesn't quite make it for me), or more "here, waggle these phallic controllers in time to dumbed down versions of sports!" (I think it may actually be called Wii Sports, but don't quote me on that)... well, if I see that, rest assured, Nintendo will be dead to me. I guess that'll be okay to them, since they've got the casual market so locked up they'll continue printing money for generations to come.
So honestly, the console race is still so neck-and-neck that I can't make a prediction. I just can't. At this point, I wish a third party with fresh ideas would come in and school everybody on innovation. The only company that I think could get the job done on that front would be Apple, but then, Apple has never really shown much interest in gaming in the past. Don't spout to me that the iPhone counts, because it doesn't. Not yet, at least. Too bad Sega doesn't have enough decent brand names left to re-enter the hardware business.
Log in to comment