Easy next
You live in a magical world where all platforms cost the same amount of money, will support every game you would ever want to play, and will be adopted by all of your friends; which do you choose?
PC and Battlefield 3
that is all
PC :
- runs games faster and has them looking wildly better
- supports both gamepads and KB+M
- has better more steady internet which allows better multiplayer with dedicated servers and big player counts even in resource-hungry games like Battlefield 3
- can run all the games ever released in the world (don't forget about emulation tools allowing you to play console games on the PC)
- has less expensive games
- has Steam with it's mindblowing sales
- has MMOs and RTS games, something many people wish they could get into
- has mods that could turn a game around 180 degrees, or just add endless diverse content to it for free
The reason it's not as popular is because it's an expensive crystal ball. but now that it's costing as much as any other platform (in this poll), i predict it's gonna be the top vote.
" ah crap, picked 360 because of the controller, realised u can get one for the PC *Facepalm* "I did the same thing
1 billion dollars. Fortunately you have a gift card to a store that only sells the above mentioned, for 1 billion dollars. :P
PC takes it for me. If there are no differences in what can run the games and what each system costs respectively, then PC is the only choice. After playing Bad Company 2 for over a year at 30 fps, my mind is blown every time I see it running at a full 60 on the PC. I literally can't handle it.
it does actually.. you connect it to a huge monitor or a TV in your living room, place it by the TV (looking alot better than a dead black box, with its seductive blue-lit case and fancy parts rolling inside), you connect a gamepad to it, sit back in your couch and voila ! not my gaming position of choice, but it can be done exactly the way you do it with your console, except that it looks alot fancier and better than a block-like box" I picked PlayStation because I want a box to look nice when it is hanging out under my TV. Some of you PC guys forget that those things don't belong in living rooms. "
check this shit out :
PC, why anyone would choose otherwise is beyond me.
Paying $250 for something that's about 10 times superior in everything but power consumption?
Btw, I don't own a gaming PC, nor have I ever, because that shit's expensive. But my laptop is decent, and games on it are sex.
" @Punk1984 said:No offense, but that is a block." I picked PlayStation because I want a box to look nice when it is hanging out under my TV. Some of you PC guys forget that those things don't belong in living rooms. "it does actually.. you connect it to a huge monitor or a TV in your living room, place it by the TV (looking alot better than a dead black box, with its seductive blue-lit case and fancy parts rolling inside), you connect a gamepad to it, sit back in your couch and voila !not my gaming position of choice, but it can be done exactly the way you do it with your console, except that it looks alot more fancier and better than a block-like boxcheck this shit out :"
A one price PC = a console.
I slightly favour Sony as a brand, but otherwise it's totally arbitrary.
I'd prefer if it were the PC, though.
" PS2 <3 "...or this.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment