If you don't come to Star Wars as a kid and can't appreciate it's historical value, then yeah, I guess I could see thinking it's just bad? It's really hard for me to divorce my love for Star Wars from my childhood, but boy do I like a lot of stuff about Episode IV. I know that Empire is supposed to be the better film or whatever, but I dunno, A New Hope is a way better movie than Empire is a film.
Stripped out of all it's grand context, they're really weird, neat movies. Since Star Wars we've seen a lot of things like it; media that is essentially a Frankenstein made up from other weird things. Tarantino has made a career of off that sort of thing. Spielberg did it too when he made the Indiana Jones movies, making a massive sendup of adventure serials and pulp. Even more recent stuff like Afro Samurai mixes hip hop with kung fu and robots, etc. Star Wars is a super fucking weird science fiction fantasy film that borrows heavily from Kurosawa, westerns, and war movies, all set pretty strictly to the twelve (or so?) bullet points of Campbell's monomyth.
It's a oddball pet project that managed to capture the whole world, and still is a pop culture behemoth nearly 40 years after the release of the original film.
The opinion that V is the best and that I-III are burning garbage is kind of insane. IV and V are good movies (I'm way partial to V), VI is probably as good as III, which is a little bit better than II, which is a little bit better than I.
I would advise you check out Harmy's despecialized editions, which made me really, really really appreciate the original trilogy in a way I hadn't before. If nothing else, just check out this sort YouTube video where he talks about the restoration, it is very neat.
I hope I don't sound like some wild defender of Star Wars, I'm actually a lot more partial to Indiana Jones. I sure like Star Wars a bunch though.
Log in to comment