Underwear, pants/shorts, and shirt. Socks are only put on right before I leave, or if it's cold...which is rare.
In which order do you put on your clothes?
I'll make the obvious response others are not writing (explicitly), I follow the order that is the sexiest (in my opinion), in an effort to tempt my wife*. So
- (30 push ups and then) underwear
- (another 40 push ups and then) pants
- ( a few sprays of cologne before donning) under shirt
- (by now my wife is off to the shower so) everything else is whatever order.
Like Brad, I dislike socks and put them on only right before shoes. Also, I would skip socks and shoes if my job allowed.
*It doesn't work.
1. Pants
2. Chest Piece
3. Boots
4. Gloves
5. Cowl
6. Uitilty Belt
7. Cape
Then I prowl the rooftops at night, searching for thugs to beat up.
I generally put my clothes on the opposite way to how I take them off. First, I tend to take off my coat, then my pants, then (depending on if I am listening to something) my shirt, socks, wooly leggings (it gets cold here) and finally my underwear, though sometimes I take off my socks before my shirt and occasionally leave the shirt for last if it is cold.
Underwear, undershirt/tee, pants, shirt, sweater, socks, shoes, and jacket....mask.
But then I think of the TREES!
I wanted to be a lumberjack! Leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia!
He cuts down trees, he wears high heels?
Suspendies and a bra?
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
He sleeps all night and he works all day
He's a lumberjack and he's OK
Sleeps all night and he works all day
Pants.
So, like the Hulk
@monkeyking1969: Except way less muscles. And way more body hair.
I was watching a video a few days ago about how a 17th, 18th and 20th century woman would dress. This was for the lower classes where a woman would have to dress herself. The actually procedure to dress was interesting because there was only one way to get the layers on single handedly. It was all based on if they woman could still bend because she didn't have a corset on. Once ha corset of upper stiff undergarment was on everything had to be something you could pull over your head and cloud push how and smooth without bending. It appears that every century it go easier to dress and less layers were needed. The easier cloths are to clean and that less expsisve clothing is to buy (vs income) the easier dressing became. And, to be sure the quality and sophistication of materials helped – wool blends, polyesters, genetically improved cotton all helped. It now easier to have warm breathable fabrics so that less layers do more. Then add to that we are CLEANER. Humans wash more, we clean after using the bathroom better, and we oral, body, and hair care makes us less smelly.
Today a woman could do a gymnastic routine in her 'everyday clothing'. Far different from three or four players layers of clothing that would have made a "summer" light weight outfit for the common women in the 18th century. We are heading for a single layer or nude level of clothing.
I actually think in 100 years most workplaces and public areas will have showers, and its will be common to take an afternoon shower at work or "in town". That mixed with Nano-machines that keep middle class bodies fit, blemish free, and attractive will mean people wear less clothing but want to wash up more. If most people are fit, attractive, and clean; then less clothing will be preferred.
You know that Star Trek TNG eposdoe called Justice where Wheley is gonna get killed for stomping on a plant? Yeah, we will look like those people.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment