Its a  
Intel i3 530 processor. (2.9 ghz)

6gb ddr3 
geforce gt320 1gb
Got a 1080p hd lcd  with it, i think its about 24 of 25 inch. 
 
Remember that 800 euros is around 1100 dollars. But because of the tax here and a bunch of stuff the money comes down to the same thing. 
So is it any good?

CPU: Dual-cores are quickly becoming outdated, by todays standards this is probably somewhere in  the low end of the mid-range cards.
RAM: Unless you have a 64-bit OS you're only going to be able to use about half that. Otherwise pretty nice.
GPU: Looks pretty mediocre. It's also an OEM card, so you won't be able to overclock either.
 
Basically don't expect to even be able to run most recent games very well (or at all, depending on how recent we''re talking) in 1080p unless you set everything else to low. And for $1100? Dang dude, sorry to say but that's a horrible "deal".

Dude 1080p is the place where you went wrong.It's not a bad machine,neither was mine,then I switched to 1080p and had to upgrade.Soo yeah,the resolution will probablly kill it.

" CPU: Dual-cores are quickly becoming outdated, by todays standards this is probably somewhere in  the low end of the mid-range cards.RAM: Unless you have a 64-bit OS you're only going to be able to use about half that. Otherwise pretty nice.GPU: Looks pretty mediocre. It's also an OEM card, so you won't be able to overclock either. Basically don't expect to even be able to run most recent games very well (or at all, depending on how recent we''re talking) in 1080p unless you set everything else to low. And for $1100? Dang dude, sorry to say but that's a horrible "deal". "

" @Three0neFive said:

" CPU: Dual-cores are quickly becoming outdated, by todays standards this is probably somewhere in  the low end of the mid-range cards.RAM: Unless you have a 64-bit OS you're only going to be able to use about half that. Otherwise pretty nice.GPU: Looks pretty mediocre. It's also an OEM card, so you won't be able to overclock either. Basically don't expect to even be able to run most recent games very well (or at all, depending on how recent we''re talking) in 1080p unless you set everything else to low. And for $1100? Dang dude, sorry to say but that's a horrible "deal". "

Hey I have a core 2 duo (2.2ghz) processor, 8600gt (512mb) graphic card, and 2gb RAM. And yet I can run MW2 with all video options on and AA and everything with no trace of a lag. And now Im playing DAO on max settings.  No lag at all. Yet my machines specs look lower than his. How is this possible? (or are my specs NOT lower?) "

Shouldn't this be a question you should ask BEFORE your make the purchase?  Just sayin'...

Honestly, apart from WoW, I don't think you're going to be doing any gaming on that.

"Honestly, apart from WoW, I don't think you're going to be doing any gaming on that. "

You should really ask these kinds of questions before you buy something....

" @armaan8014 said:

" @Three0neFive said:

" CPU: Dual-cores are quickly becoming outdated, by todays standards this is probably somewhere in  the low end of the mid-range cards.RAM: Unless you have a 64-bit OS you're only going to be able to use about half that. Otherwise pretty nice.GPU: Looks pretty mediocre. It's also an OEM card, so you won't be able to overclock either. Basically don't expect to even be able to run most recent games very well (or at all, depending on how recent we''re talking) in 1080p unless you set everything else to low. And for $1100? Dang dude, sorry to say but that's a horrible "deal". "

Hey I have a core 2 duo (2.2ghz) processor, 8600gt (512mb) graphic card, and 2gb RAM. And yet I can run MW2 with all video options on and AA and everything with no trace of a lag. And now Im playing DAO on max settings.  No lag at all. Yet my machines specs look lower than his. How is this possible? (or are my specs NOT lower?) "

Your right..the guy who posted behind me doenst know what he´s talking about.  First of all you shouldt look at the price and think o its 1100 dollars. We got alot of taxes over here and a bunch of other stuff . If i go to the dell website and order a m11x alienware its still 800 euro's. And when you go to the american site its 800 dollars. And i cant run recent games very well or at all? Well i just played the crysis demo and i could run it on high with water turned to medium. I got chaos rising from steam and i can run that on all high and some stuff on ultra.    "

  @Gizmo said:

" Honestly, apart from WoW, I don't think you're going to be doing any gaming on that. "

The processor looks like the weak link, but the computer will do fine.  Make sure you install Win 7 64, as the first reply indicated, though, because 32 won't be able to take advantage of all that RAM.

Tbh, I don't think it's worth it, the cpu is weak, the gpu is aweful and a monitor can be bought for $200 that's 1080p, your videocard won't be able to run games on it. I say don't buy it and find something better.

"   @Gizmo said:

" Honestly, apart from WoW, I don't think you're going to be doing any gaming on that. "

Dude, my computer is a bit worse than this (I have worse RAM and a worse graphics card, processor is a little better), and I can run several newer games.  DMC4 at low/med settings, Left 4 Dead 2 at med, Crysis' demo at low, etc.  He'll be able to boot plenty of things fine, maybe not at high settings, but he can easily run plenty of newer stuff.  

"  @Gizmo said:

" Honestly, apart from WoW, I don't think you're going to be doing any gaming on that. "

Dude, my computer is a bit worse than this (I have worse RAM and a worse graphics card, processor is a little better), and I can run several newer games.  DMC4 at low/med settings, Left 4 Dead 2 at med, Crysis' demo at low, etc.  He'll be able to run plenty of things fine, maybe not at high settings, but he can easily run plenty of newer stuff.    Edit:  To answer the question, you could probably have got a much better deal, but it's still an alright computer.  I got mine with a 21" monitor and it's close to the quality of yours (a little worse, as I said) for 700 dollars. "

Americans will always think that's a bad deal because you guys get things ridiculously cheap. For the rest of the world that's a pretty good price considering you also got a monitor but it's not really the best system.

" You should really ask these kinds of questions before you buy something.... "

"If you already know that your low-mid end PC is good enough to run these games, then what exactly is the point of this thread? "

" @gunslingerNZ: Yeah i know its not the best....and the problem is its a acer aspire so its a slim pc. Like 3 times the size of a normal one. You think a better videocard could fit in there? Because i did see pictures of the geforce gt230 and it is a small card. "

Erm, where did you get this PC? No reseller that I know of (besides Apple) sells mobile GPU chips on desktops (unless you bought a laptop?). The Geforce GT 320 M is a notebook GPU in line with the 9600M GT; its performance is pretty much low-end at best. It also has to be a decidedly unexciting GPU if after 2 months of its release there are zero reviews or benchmarks for it. For 800 euro you could've gotten something at least twice as good. It's not about playing games at "200 fps", it's about getting the best performance for your money and you got gipped. You essentially bought a console for 800 euro.
 
You should also make a distinction between running (e.g. got to the menu screen and loaded a level) and playing (60fps ave, 40fps min) at high settings (1920x1080, all settings high-highest with at least 4x AA). 30fps with low-medium settings (which is what you're running at with sub 1080p resolution with no AA if I'm presuming correctly) is not an ideal way to play games. You don't need a 400 dollar graphics card, but a low end OEM mobile GPU isn't going to cut it either if you want to play modern games at reasonable quality and performance.
 
This is why you ask these type of questions before buying a computer.

"Erm, where did you get this PC? No reseller that I know of (besides Apple) sells mobile GPU chips on desktops (unless you bought a laptop?). The Geforce GT 320 M is a notebook GPU in line with the 9600M GT; its performance is pretty much low-end at best. It also has to be a decidedly unexciting GPU if after 2 months of its release there are zero reviews or benchmarks for it. For 800 euro you could've gotten something at least twice as good. It's not about playing games at "200 fps", it's about getting the best performance for your money and you got gipped. You essentially bought a console for 800 euro.
 
You should also make a distinction between running (e.g. got to the menu screen and loaded a level) and playing (60fps ave, 40fps min) at high settings (1920x1080, all settings high-highest with at least 4x AA). 30fps with low-medium settings (which is what you're running at with sub 1080p resolution with no AA if I'm presuming correctly) is not an ideal way to play games. You don't need a 400 dollar graphics card, but a low end OEM mobile GPU isn't going to cut it either if you want to play modern games at reasonable quality and performance.
 
This is why you ask these type of questions before buying a computer. "

Edited, I thought you mean the gt230 which is a 9600gt. I haven't found too much info on the gt320 for benchmarks though, I did find the card at nvidia's site.

Hey, 2001 games will run like a dream.

"@Edin8999: That's the thing, there's no GT 320 for desktops. All GT 300 series GPUs are OEM notebook GPUs. So whoever sold you your desktop used a notebook motherboard with a notebook GPU (and most likely other notebook parts as well). This is shady dealings to say the least. Apple, though horrendously overpriced and laughably underpowered at least does it for form factor and clearly lists it in their technical specs.  "