@wemibelec90 said:
@KingBroly: These seem like complaints people had before the game came out, before they knew what the final product might be (although I can understand concerns about Ninja Theory doing a combat system). I'm just listing complaints I've seen online in the past few days with my thoughts because it was bugging me.
@ViciousReiven: It is absolutely less intricate. However, remember how much simpler 1 is than 3? I do, having just played both of them. DMC 3 was an evolution of the series, built upon the framework of the last two games as the developer learned what worked and what didn't. I think Ninja Theory should be given the same chance. If the next game remains rather simplistic and NT doesn't do any work to make it better, I think an argument could be better made at that point. I would have been shocked to see a company like NT, one that hasn't developed a great combat system before, to make something as crazy complex as DMC 3.
I suppose taken from that perspective you could say that this DmC could go towards DMC3 levels of complexity in the next game. However, lets remember that there was nothing like DMC when it was initially made. This game had a plethora of examples from which to build from and it decided to largely ignore them, but I guess we wont know until they make DmC2 and see if the combat gets more complex.
Log in to comment