WillRaptorclaw133

Despite his radical efforts and his perhaps "overkill attitude" I always somewhat respected Iorveth and the Scoia'tael in terms of their cause. Aside from their absolute hatred to all humans, which to me is what places them in the wrong, what they are fighting is a real threat indeed. With or without siding with Iorveth, you will see a modicum of violence from humans to "Nonhumans" in form of massacres or just flat out bigotry, racial discrimination, and social biases; a lot like that same very problem here, in reality. Therefore, if the decision was up to me, to choose between a secret service agent who works for the government and a rebellion leader who fights against(radical or not) a serious problem in said society, I would choose the one who I could easily see the planned result of from the get go. Besides, *SPOILER ALERT* even if you side with Iorveth, Vernon Roche keeps his faith in you, perhaps believing that even with the Scoia'tael, you would still end up doing the right thing. And even if you side with Roche, unlike Iorveth's path, Kaedweni would just once again, swallow up the Pontar Valley, leaving the nonhumans with nowhere to feel safe. And I do not believe Iorveth shows up in the Witcher 3, but Roche does, thus it is morally better to side with a band of rebels for once, just for the sake of standing up for the mistreated nonhumans and even doing them a grand favor by giving them a safe place to call home. I honestly hope this some of you out there a more detailed description of the moral effects of the decision between the two factions. ??