Giant Bomb Review


Star Trek: D-A-C Review

  • XBGS

Star Trek: D-A-C isn't what you want out of a multiplayer space shooter, and it certainly isn't what you want out of a Star Trek game, either.

You must control the rings.
While the world of Star Trek has always featured a ton of wild, futuristic, high-tech stuff, the core of it all has always been the people. The Star Trek brand has spawned a few pretty good games that remain true to the heart of the series, but it's also churned out some pretty lame stuff over the years. Star Trek: D-A-C, released in concert with this summer's blockbuster film, falls into the "pretty lame" category. It's a dull downloadable shooter with a multiplayer focus, sort of like Battlestar Galactica and Wing Commander Arena. Unless you're after that kind of top-down action, you definitely don't want any part of this.

Actually, even if top-down multiplayer space shooting sounds like your thing, D-A-C isn't exactly the best of its kind. It offers three team-based modes that pit the Federation against the Romulans, and each side has three classes of ship. The fighters are small and fast, but don't pack much of a punch and blow up after a scratch or two. The bomber only drops bombs, making it a rear-firing ship that only really comes in handy if you're trying to defend a spot in one of the two objective-based modes. The flagship is the one that looks like the Enterprise (or Nero's ship, if you're a Romulan) and it fires the hardest shots and offers the most hull strength. Unsurprisingly, it's also pretty slow. Maybe it's just the way I play, but I found the fighter and bomber ships to be absolutely worthless.

The game allows up to five ships per side, and you can play offline against artificial opponents, or you can play co-op, which lets multiple humans play on the same machine against AI. Online, as you might expect, lets you play against and with real people in team deathmatch, conquest, and assault modes. Conquest is a control point mode where you must keep your ships in a capture ring to take over the points. When your side controls all the points, the enemy base opens up for capture. Assault mode is similar, but it puts one team on the defensive while another team tries to control a chain of points to open up the enemy base. It's pretty standard stuff that would probably be fine if the game surrounding those modes was any fun.

The main issue is that the game feels totally lifeless. Beyond some nice-looking space backgrounds, D-A-C looks very plain. The explosions and special attack effects aren't great, and the ships turn, bank, and move in weird-looking ways. It feels more like naval combat than space combat. Other than the sounds of explosions and the alarm noise that sounds when your ship is about to explode, there isn't much personality to the audio, either.

Star Trek: D-A-C is totally functional, but aside from having a recognizable spaceship in it and naming a secret achievement after the Kobayashi Maru, there's nothing particularly Trek-like about it. It's another bad top-down multiplayer shooter on a system that already has more than enough of the same. Jeff Gerstmann on Google+
15 Comments Refresh
Posted by Deathdealer108

I disliked both Battlestar Galactica and Wing Commander Arena so this is a pass for me.

Posted by Jensonb

I've said it before, I'll say it again:

They need to make another Bridge Commander

Posted by theMcNasty

I'm surprised this game got 2 stars.  After that quick look, the game felt more like a 1.

Posted by TwoOneFive

hmm. o well. movie was awesome enough to make up for this turd. 

Posted by coonce
Jensonb said:
I've said it before, I'll say it again:They need to make another Bridge Commander
no way -- Star Control II is the only true bad-ass space game!
Posted by peerLAN

A Bridge Commander game, with the current technology would be a bless. Add a bit of FPS for fun maybe and a living community on the starship and it will be full of win.

Posted by Matt_

This really seems like an odd choice for a tie-in game.

Posted by JackiJinx

It's a good day not to like Star Trek.

Posted by JerichoBlyth

Can you say 'Cash-in'?

Posted by RHCPfan24

Looks pretty crappy. That achievement is awesome though. Almost made me get it (I have no soul).

Posted by Media_Master


Posted by Arjuna

Being an enormous Star Trek fan I bought this game instinctively, which was likely their plan all along.  I played this game for about 5 minutes, saw it for what it was, and totally gave up on it.  Jeff is right:  there's nothing "Star Trek" about this game.  Without the Star Trek, it's barely a good shooter.  This game sucks!

Want a good Star Trek game?  Star Trek:  Legacy.  It's not a great game by itself:  but it is definitely Star Trek, and it's not too bad as a shooter.  It features the voices-actingof all five original Captains(including Shatner and Picard), which is cool, right?
Posted by JJWeatherman

Good review. Quick and to the point.

Posted by cdwjustin

this game is horrible

Posted by Canadian_Snake

This game is god awful.  Hopefully Star Trek Online is better, beta is promising.