Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

148 Comments

Activision Blizzard Buys MLG for $46M, Aims to Build "The ESPN of eSports"

This acquisition follows the recent creation of an Activision eSports Division. It also seems like it could be a bad move.

Is this eSports?
Is this eSports?

Back in October, Activision Blizzard announced its intentions to make a splash in the growing eSports industry by establishing a discrete eSports division, hiring former ESPN president Steve Bornstein and Major League Gaming co-founder and then president Mike Sepso. Now it's taking another step in that direction by acquiring the rest of Major League Gaming.

Activision-Blizzard announced the purchase in a press release posted yesterday, and though no figure is given in the release itself, an early report from the eSports Observer cites a stockholder letter indicating that that Activision Blizzard is spending $46M on the acquisition.

In a statement included in the press release, Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick re-iterated the company's eSports plans:

“Our acquisition of Major League Gaming’s business furthers our plans to create the ESPN of esports. MLG’s ability to create premium content and its proven broadcast technology platform – including its live streaming capabilities – strengthens our strategic position in competitive gaming. MLG has an incredibly strong and seasoned team and a thriving community. Together, we will create new ways to celebrate players and their unique skills, dedication and commitment to gaming.”

While there's no disputing that eSports is continuing to grow, I can't help but see this as an incredibly bold claim for a number of reasons.

First, as of the time of this announcement, Activision Blizzard has no public deal allowing them to broadcast footage from major eSports like League of Legends or DOTA2. Put simply, being unable to cover LCS or The International would be like ESPN being unable to cover the Super Bowl. That's not to say that Activision Blizzard doesn't have its own eSports properties. Heroes of the Storm, Starcraft, and to a lesser degree Call of Duty have established competitive scenes (EDIT: And, as GotFrag co-founder and former COO of Evil Geniuses Scott Smith correctly reminds me, so does Hearthstone!) Looking forward, I can Activision Blizzard's share of the eSports market continuing to grow (especially if Overwatch does well), but so long as eSports coverage remains fractured and company-run, it's hard to imagine anyone becoming "the ESPN of eSports."

Building off of this problem is the fact that MLG just may not be the best way to build this sort of network. When eSports was first kicking off, MLG positioned itself uniquely as the place to go to for competitive gaming. But as game companies began running their own major tournaments, MLG's importance started to fade. This is reflected in the purchase price: When you look at Activision Blizzard's balance book, $46M isn't that much. After all, this is the company that (sort of) spent $5.9B on King last fall. In speaking with our own Brad Shoemaker about the deal earlier, he said it incisively: "$46M is probably more than MLG is worth, but it's also less than it should have been worth."

For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?
For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?

There's also the matter of shareholder response to this purchase. The report from the eSports Observer reveals that this acquisition was a “corporate action taken without a stockholders’ meeting by less than unanimous written consent of our stockholders." Among the group of stockholders who did decide to make this purchase was Legion Capital Investments LLC, a group managed by Mike Sepso--Yes, the Mike Sepso who recently left MLG and joined Activision Blizzard. That's not really enough to get conspiratorial about, but things get worse when you look at the current state of MLG. Again, from the eSports Observer report:

Stockholders not in these categories are largely meeting the decision in disbelief. Some speculate that the majority of the sale will go towards paying off MLG’s debts, leaving little to go around for the remaining stockholders. MLG has filed for multiple debtfinancing rounds this year alone, for a sum of over $6 million. “I got fucked on stock,” said an affected stockholder, who wanted to remain anonymous.

Yikes.

Look, we just don't know enough to say that anything shady happened here, but it's pretty easy to see why an investor not involved in voting on this purchase might wonder about the motivation. At best, it makes an already questionable decision look worse. At worst, well... it's a bad, bad look.

At this point, it's hard to know how all of this will shake out. Activision Blizzard joins a number of other companies in the hunt to be the top spot for eSports coverage--including ESPN itself. While eSports can be just as exciting and dramatic as traditional sports, eSports brings unique challenges that mean that it needs to be covered in genuinely new ways. I think someone will figure that out eventually, but I'm just not sure that this purchase indicates that Activision Blizzard will be addressing those challenges. Time will tell if I'm proven wrong.

148 Comments

Avatar image for pakattak
pakattak

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit

- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players

- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest

- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama

- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact

- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"

- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

/r/dota2 in a nutshell.

Avatar image for internetdotcom
InternetDotCom

4038

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ok fine I will step up.

I will be the Skip Bayless of ESports

Avatar image for isomeri
isomeri

3528

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 26

ESports are now being constantly broadcast on my government controlled (tax payer funded) TV stations, so why would I need MLG?

Avatar image for shodan2020
shodan2020

966

Forum Posts

6359

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

I'm sure it will be fine guys, Mr. Kotick was in "Moneyball" after all. *eye roll* What could possibly go wrong?

Avatar image for triumvir
triumvir

644

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By triumvir

What an amazing and totally not gross decision that could never backfire in any way.

Avatar image for omatictoast
omatictoast

251

Forum Posts

33

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If eSports meant less COD / Halo and more Mutant League Football / Tecmo Bowl, I'd be all in... but alas.. outside CS:GO.. the games played as "eSports" have very little appeal to me.

Avatar image for grumpymoose
GrumpyMoose

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@notnert427: All of this and then some. These are the reasons why many do not take espn seriously anymore or simply have stopped watching myself included. Emulating a brand that is continuing to diminish in credibility is a bad move.

Avatar image for slag
Slag

8308

Forum Posts

15965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 45

@homelessbird: You got me man.

I have to imagine they just gave him a press pass right and let him be on a volunteer panel or something? I doubt he was paid by the event but I don't know. I think the writer has previously been with a more legit outfit and had been established on the esports scene for a while. I dunno if his politics or career reasons led him to breitbart

Avatar image for grumpymoose
GrumpyMoose

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@slag: Breitbart is infinitely more reputable than any of those other outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Huffington Post. Unlike them Breitbart doesn't purposely omit details from reports or ignore stories that don't fit their agenda. I hate to end your Conservative media bashing but the actual fact based reporting far exceed anything from those rags or MSM.

Avatar image for ptys
ptys

2290

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Candy Crush now this? Activation...vision has more money than cents.

Avatar image for homelessbird
Homelessbird

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@slag: I got the impression that he was being paid, but I haven't looked into it in depth either. Oh well. I guess even businesses live and learn.

@grumpymoose: lol. Nice profile pic.

Avatar image for luck702
Luck702

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh my god, this headline is freaking hilarious. I didn't even know MLG was a private company to be bought.

Avatar image for shadowswordmaster
ShadowSwordmaster

1119

Forum Posts

714

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I hope this works out.

Avatar image for e30bmw
e30bmw

655

Forum Posts

69

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@homelessbird: Richard Lewis was an "esports" reporter/journalist/personality long before he worked that. He actually only started working there very recently.

Avatar image for homelessbird
Homelessbird

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@e30bmw: I guess that makes it more understandable. He'd be off my list of hires anyway, personally, but I don't run eSports events so what do I know

Avatar image for ptshooter619
ptshooter619

21

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Look to see Blizzard trying to squeeze every penny out of this by being as greedy as possible.

Avatar image for ivdamke
ivdamke

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Taking the Riot route and buying yourself into competitive gaming is the worst.

Companies need to look at Capcom, they were very smart about how they injected their event into the competitive scene making it entirely seamless so it boosted both the popularity of their product as well as the community built around it.

Avatar image for nok
nok

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

@matthewgm: Right and ESPN has been dropping viewership for some time now. I'm fairly certain none of us have any idea what else came along with the purchase, whether that be technology, users, user data, potential casters etc. Also, even though World of Warcraft has been shedding subscribers like crazy 46 million is still only one month of subscription fees for that game. It'll be interesting to look back on this in a year.

Avatar image for whizbang
Whizbang

119

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Maybe the ESPN 8 of eSports.

Avatar image for tehbull
tehbull

853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

ESPN doesn't broadcast the Super Bowl either.

Avatar image for zaldar
zaldar

1127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Depending on where MLG is organized business wise they definitely did commit some law breaking here. Majority owners of corporations are supposed to protect the minority owners of corporations and do what is in the best interests of the corporation. As well most states have a business law that says before a complete buy out happens a large number of the owners have to vote for it. Not having a vote at all is a big big problem. I expect there will be a stock owners lawsuit here.

Avatar image for disabilityfishy
DisAbiLityFisHy

1185

Forum Posts

5926

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@jakob187 said:

I have a feeling that, very soon, Activision Blizzard will be announcing that Heroes of the Storm, Call of Duty, Overwatch, and any of their other games will ONLY be available for stream through MLG.

I mean, let's be honest: that's totally the kind of thing Bobby Kotick would do.

my thoughts exactly..

Avatar image for dukest3
DukesT3

2114

Forum Posts

773

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I got fucked on stock.

This has to be the 2016 quote of the years. Haaaaaaaaaaa!

Avatar image for audiosnow
audiosnow

3926

Forum Posts

729

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By audiosnow

They bought all of MLG? That's a lot of Xbox 360 gamer picture packs...

And they have to choose capitalization and hyphenation first. "esports"? "e-sports"? "E-sports"? "Esports"?

It certainly isn't "eSports," unless sports is suddenly a proper noun, or it's being brought to you by Apple, Inc.

EDIT: Probably, the most acceptable format would be "e-sports," which would be de-hyphenated after a few years to "esports," just like "email"'s path to validity. And as you can see, I have no idea how to make a word within quotes possessive.

Avatar image for fatalfirecrotch
FatalFirecrotch

21

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@longmasterwolf: There is a difference between forced eSports and eSports. CoD and Starcraft have been played competitively for a really long time and HoTS and Hearthstone are developing a strong scene of their own (especially Hearthstone).

Avatar image for fatalfirecrotch
FatalFirecrotch

21

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FatalFirecrotch
@lawgamer said:

Is there anyone here who can explain why eSports might become a thing? I'm not asking sarcastically, I'm genuinely curious. Every time I've seen a snippet of coverage, it looked and sounded really, really dumb. Basically Dodgeball ESPN "The Ocho"-level announcers who fail to explain any terminology paired with participants with lame gamertag/pro-wrestling names. There was a lot of "Grandmaster Shift McClutch with a wicked carry!". It was probably one of the most off-putting unwatchable things I've seen recently.

It kinda reminded me of early X-Games style stuff - trying way too hard to be hip and cool.

Just curious, but why would you expect them to explain the terminology in most casts? You don't turn on baseball game and have them explain to you what a bunt or sacrifice is.

@baronsamedi: Are you just ignorant or dumb? Buying their way into competitive gaming? Starcraft has been one of the biggest eSports for over a decade and CoD has been going strong for 5 years.

Avatar image for lttibbles
LtTibbles

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@fatalfirecrotch: Shhh shhh shhh....it's Activision and esports they're the devils killing videogames etc. etc.

Avatar image for monkeyking1969
monkeyking1969

9098

Forum Posts

1241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 18

Edited By monkeyking1969

The scary part might be that MLG was on the ropes trying to get backers or a buyer. But, nobody wanted it! Nobody cared at all about saving it, so EA actually stepped up to provide the money. Those stockholders were going to get nothing anyway because MLG was/is dead/dying.

Well, they stepped in to do 'a solid' if you believe MLG was offering something worth saving.

I'll just say, for me, I think MLG is 99% dudes playing shooters. And that is interesting for 10 minutes only. In fact the whole eSpprts category seems shaky to me. Keep in mind 150 years ago competitive rowing was as big as basketball is today even without tv, stadiums and teeshirts sales....now its gone. And 100 years ago boxing was huge...now that is (pardon the pun) on the ropes. Fifty years ago professional bowling was huge....now its dead. I'd say eSports are on a much shorter trajectory. In 20 years people will say, "Those strategy games and shooters were a sport? lol"

Avatar image for robowitch
robowitch

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

eSPN?

This is the most compelling argument for the ESPN of eSports imo.

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

The investment seems too small for it to be a bad move. That's without factoring in whatever operating costs we're talking about.

Avatar image for wd30
WD30

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@amyggen: I volunteer. That job seems easy, and I never had that much use for friends anyway.

Avatar image for kefrentz
kefrentz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm sure it's been pointed out, but ESPN has never aired the Superbowl. It's always on network TV.

Avatar image for razgriz777
Razgriz777

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lawgamer: I can't speak for other games but the casting in Dota is pretty straightforward and on point- the biggest problem with it is, is that the game is so ridiculously convoluted and complex that there's no way someone could even begin to explain things to you over the course of a 45 minute game. At the International (basically the dota superbowl) they do have a newbie stream to help out newer players and they explain things much more clearly.

The real problem is though if they actually took the time to EXPLAIN the shit that was happening thoroughly you'd be there longer than the match. It's sort of like football or baseball, the announcers are doing play by play and analysis of what's happening with the understanding that you get the basic rules and tenets of the game, if they had to slow down and walk you through each hoop it would be a real boring cast and take forever. I completely get where you're coming from though- if you're still curious about anything else lemme know.

Avatar image for blacklab
blacklab

2025

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

So if it's the ESPN of E-sports, how will they work in LeBron James?

Avatar image for rjaylee
rjaylee

3804

Forum Posts

529

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

What a ridiculous house of cards this industry is built upon.

Avatar image for deactivated-60dda8699e35a
deactivated-60dda8699e35a

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm surprised that they did this, considering they pretty much killed the Starcraft 2 scene by doing jack shit with it.

Avatar image for deactivated-6050ef4074a17
deactivated-6050ef4074a17

3686

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

My least favorite thing about gaming in general is seeing so many people try to take parts of the hobby and, in one way or another, try to turn it into the way some other medium, or some other hobby, does things. "Why can't game awards be more serious like the Oscars?" "Well movies do this, why can't video games?" topped with "We need to make the ESPN of gaming!" Like, ugh.

I feel at constant war with blowhards and rich fucks who want to remold anything interesting and unique about games into something pre-packaged and cookie cutter. This all just sounds terrible.

Avatar image for raven10
Raven10

2427

Forum Posts

376

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 5

@bicycle_repairman: It's not very different from Fox owning Newspapers, TV networks, film production and distribution businesses, and numerous other entertainment and journalistic properties. At any one point, newspapers and websites owned by Fox review the content created by the TV and film divisions. Or, you might argue it is not that different from the beast that is Time Warner, owner of dozens of print and internet newspapers and magazines, alongside multiple TV channels, film distributors and producers, music producers, game publishers, and literally hundreds of other divisions, many of which critique and report on the actions taken by various other parts of the company. Really between Fox, Time Warner, and Comcast which owns NBC Universal, all of your news comes from the same people who manufacture the content the news is covering. And in the case of Comcast they also own the means of delivering that content to your home. Conflicts of interest are everywhere in the world of news. ABC, NBC, Fox, and CNN are all owned by mega-corps, and most newspapers and magazines are owned by the same handful of corps.

Avatar image for jondo
JonDo

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bad people do bad things, and don't stop.

-Kurt Cobain

Avatar image for reikokirishima
ReikoKirishima

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't see the issue here. It probably would have cost more than a bit to build their own infrastructure, so they just bought their own. Seems smart enough to me.

Avatar image for amirite
amirite

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@raven10: Cool let's just roll over and accept it then.

Avatar image for raven10
Raven10

2427

Forum Posts

376

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 5

@amirite: If you want to get indignant about massive multinational corporations then there are plenty of great options. Comcast comes to mind with both a vertical and horizontal monopoly on film and TV distribution and creation in certain locations if you want to stick to entertainment companies. Nestle and their behavior regarding the drought in California. Any major bank in any major country in the world. Any of the descendants of Standard Oil. PMC's. Pharmaceutical companies that sell pills that cost pennies to make for tens of thousands of dollars. Really the list could go on and on, but if I had to choose a list of companies to protest, the only game company on the list would be Konami.

I'm not going to say that I love massive conglomerates or that they are a great thing. But I can tell you that considering the state of MLG's capital going into this deal, they were never going to amount to more than they were and they were likely going to get swept under by better funded and better managed organizations. Meanwhile, Activision has neither the history, nor the experience to build an MLG style service. This merger makes sense then for both companies. MLG gets the funds of a multi-billion dollar corporation that has remained profitable for every year of this century when all other game related companies were taking heavy losses. Activision doesn't have to worry about the growing pains that come with starting an eSports league.

In the end the world runs on money and running any sort of sporting event, network, or league, requires a lot of the stuff. Hundreds of millions if not billions of the stuff. And no small, independent company has those types of funds to spare. Plus Activision has a proven track record on the production side of things. Their games are always released on time and on budget and they are always incredibly well polished despite very strict timetables. Regardless of the quality of the games themselves, there is no better run company in the gaming industry. Their production pipeline is as close to flawless as it gets in an industry where year long delays are the norm and you are supposed to allot double the proposed budget to any game if you actually expect it to see store shelves.

I'd love to live in a world where all you need is a dream and some crowdfunding to make anything you desire a reality, but that isn't the world we live in and certain things require the backing of a corporation with hundreds of millions of dollars to potentially lose. Without either developing their own, in house eSport, or signing an exclusive contract with an already major eSport, MLG wasn't going to survive. And the company didn't have the money or the connections to do either of those things. Activision already makes several major eSports titles, and they have the connections and loose change to secure exclusive deals with third parties as well. If MLG was going to make it big it would have happened. The fact that no angel investor came in to fund what I am discussing proves how difficult a market they are in, and how much you need a company that has both a distribution system and content for that system if you want to make a sporting network.

Avatar image for dijon
Itwastuesday

1269

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Itwastuesday

@marokai said:

My least favorite thing about gaming in general is seeing so many people try to take parts of the hobby and, in one way or another, try to turn it into the way some other medium, or some other hobby, does things. "Why can't game awards be more serious like the Oscars?" "Well movies do this, why can't video games?" topped with "We need to make the ESPN of gaming!" Like, ugh.

I feel at constant war with blowhards and rich fucks who want to remold anything interesting and unique about games into something pre-packaged and cookie cutter. This all just sounds terrible.

it would be nice if the culture around games was a little more self-assured and less steered around by marketing buzzwords, but at this point I can't see that aspect of it ever changing. the american games biz (the biggest and most infleuntal) comes mostly from a place of big corps dumping marketing dollars and doing lots of cocaine in the 80s, so when that's the culture your new medium for art comes out of, it's easy to see why games are this way and probably always will be

Avatar image for monkeyman04
Monkeyman04

2885

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5