Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

89 Comments

Old Consoles to Get Multiplayer-Only Version of Black Ops III

Somehow I suspect that most of the people still playing Call of Duty on Xbox 360 or PS3 at this point won't actually notice.

Activision updated its official Call of Duty site with some new details on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of Call of Duty: Black Ops III. Specifically, those versions of the game will be missing some features. Considering the age of those platforms, that shouldn't be surprising. But the specifics actually surprised me a bit.

Those old versions of the game won't contain the game's campaign.

Over on the PS4, 53.5% of players have completed the first level of Advanced Warfare's campaign. Only around a quarter of all players finished the campaign.
Over on the PS4, 53.5% of players have completed the first level of Advanced Warfare's campaign. Only around a quarter of all players finished the campaign.

Weird, right? To hear the official update tell it, the large, co-op nature of the Black Ops III campaign was too much for Beenox and Mercenary Technology to cram into an Xbox 360/PS3-sized hole. Additionally, the gun painting features and "the new suite of eSports tools" will also be limited to PS4, Xbox One, and PC.

This sort of thing happens as we turn from one generation to the next. At some point, enough players are playing on the new boxes to make it crazy to continue to hamstring your games by making sure they're roughly identical on the new machines. The whole thing reminds me of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 for the PS1, which was a significantly different game when compared to its PS2 counterpart. That's certainly not the only example, but you get my point.

The PS3/360 version of Black Ops III will still contain the zombies mode and the competitive multiplayer, and it'll sell for $49.99. That's a $10 discount over the "real" version of the game. Feel free to make jokes about the value of a Call of Duty campaign being ten bucks in the comments below. This version will also come with a digital version of the original Black Ops. All told, I guess that doesn't sound like a terrible value? I don't know, I'm less-than-sold on Treyarch's big co-op campaign ideas based on what I saw back at E3, so it's hard to judge this situation right now. I'm curious to see how all that comes together.

This generational transition has been a weird one, with publishers hedging their bets at first only to discover that, yes, people are actually buying the new machines. This is how Activision's dealing with it, but then you've got Warner cutting the Nemesis system from the last-gen versions of Shadow of Mordor and... well, you've got Warner again with Mortal Kombat X.

Remember when Mortal Kombat X was supposed to ship on the old consoles right alongside the new ones? It finally got officially canceled about a month ago. Here was their official update:

Please know our teams worked diligently to meet the quality standards set by the current-gen versions of the game. We were not able to get the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions to the quality expected of a Mortal Kombat game and are very sorry for not being able to deliver the products as originally planned.

Walmart must not have got the memo, because they're taking pre-orders right now for a "December 31" release, which usually translates into "at one point someone told us this version was going to exist but then they didn't give us a new release date so we're going to keep it here just in case but we don't know what's going on."

As much as I like the way MKX looks, it seems like some version of the game could have appeared on old consoles. Maybe the cuts were too much? Or maybe most of their player base moved to new machines?
As much as I like the way MKX looks, it seems like some version of the game could have appeared on old consoles. Maybe the cuts were too much? Or maybe most of their player base moved to new machines?

Actually, now that I dig into it a bit, some third-party seller on Amazon is claiming to be selling a "collectable" copy of MKX for 360 for the low, low price of $200,000. Somehow I doubt they've got a build of the game.

One has to wonder how long the other big third-party franchises will continue to appear on the old machines. I figure we'll get down to that "sports only" catalog over the next year. Maybe two? It'll be interesting to see what that means for Destiny players, what with its whole "ten year plan" and all that. Think next year's Destiny will still try to maintain parity across all platforms? I don't.

One last thing... you know, I figured it'd be hard to find anyone angry about this Call of Duty move and that most of the people playing on those old platforms don't necessarily care enough about video games to follow them too closely, but I didn't need to look far. Here are the four comments posted to Activision's official update about all this:

No Caption Provided

Yep.

Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

89 Comments

Avatar image for wolfgame
Wolfgame

1168

Forum Posts

252

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm just glad jeff has the balls to rip on those stupid poor people. This is giant bomb done right. /end sarcasm... I think this article could have been just as relevant without kicking people "beneath" you. that's the culture though, still sad.

Avatar image for fisk0
fisk0

7321

Forum Posts

74197

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 75

fisk0  Moderator
@slab64 said:
@fisk0 said:

i actually just tried to play Advanced Warfare on PS3 yesterday only to find the game completely dead, not even a single TDM going on, so I kinda wonder how well a multiplayer only thing would do on that console at this point.

There are about 32k players on AW for PS3 at the moment. Almost 29k on 360. The percentage of those players who are hackers/cheaters is anyone's guess.

What modes are they playing? I can't find any "Current players" like the older games had, and I'm still getting "no games found" for every playlist but ranked matches. I tried both with wired and wireless Internet figuring something like that could mess something up, but it made no difference, and it did show "one potential match" in ranked, but which it couldn't join. Literally every other playlist says there aren't any matches going on.

Avatar image for benderunit22
benderunit22

1978

Forum Posts

9567

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

Hell, I'd buy a CoD game campaign for 10 bucks.

Avatar image for gravytrain
gravytrain

285

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Should definitely be cheaper, but people on older consoles should be thankful they're getting a game at all. I only own a PS3 and my expectation at this point is no new games will release for it.

Avatar image for oopprraahh
oopprraahh

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Gotta admit, I'm hopeful next year's Destiny doesn't maintain parity.

Avatar image for kasaioni
kasaioni

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for adequatelyprepared
AdequatelyPrepared

2522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If there's anything new I learnt from this article, it's that there's a PS3/360 version of Black Ops III.

Avatar image for mithhunter55
mithhunter55

1104

Forum Posts

709

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

@wolfgame said:

I'm just glad jeff has the balls to rip on those stupid poor people. This is giant bomb done right. /end sarcasm... I think this article could have been just as relevant without kicking people "beneath" you. that's the culture though, still sad.

It's not like they removed the campaign to push people to buy new systems. Apparently they had limitations with the new campaign, these supposed poor people at least still get something new. Activision could have just scrapped the old generation versions.

Avatar image for neozeon
NeoZeon

769

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@liquidsnakegfer9: How is wanting the full experience on the console they own being "entitled"? It's not like previous console owners are getting a big discount for half of the game not being there.

Honestly, they should have just canceled the PS3/360 versions. It's not like Activision cares what people think after they get their cash anyways. Especially since there are hilariously overpriced collector's editions for the current gen versions of BO3 (Including one that comes with a damn fridge) that will make up any they lose from not selling on the PS3/360.

I am a little surprised about the way they did this. I had actually always hoped that the multiplayer would be separate, but considering their track record, there is no way the publisher would sell it for less than sixty bucks. They never even brought that free to play CoD online over here...probably for that very reason (Money, obviously).

Avatar image for sogeman
Sogeman

1039

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

they should just do EA style Legacy editions and re-release the last game with new character models and guns and call it a day.

Avatar image for marcsman
Marcsman

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yawn...................................................................................

Avatar image for vibratingdonkey
vibratingdonkey

1238

Forum Posts

1219

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

I'd buy that for $10.
I'm one of those weirdos who thinks CoD MP is a bit pants but can recognize and appreciate the entertainment value of a big dumb action spectacle. But I haven't bought a CoD since Modern Warfare since they don't go down in price until the next one's announced and makes the old one seem naff.

Dumping old tech is inevitably necessary for progress. You can't really criticize Activision for doing that. The question is if customers will agree with Activision that $50 for MP only, plus some old game they've probably already played, is a good value. I'd probably argue for future DLC to be included, rather than this old junk Activision found in the corner of the basement.

Shame EA didn't go this route with Battlefront.
Battlefields were traditionally MP only, but had the value to back it up. Not so convinced by Battlefront and its 12 maps exclusive to specific modes. Spreading out your stuffs across all these modes in an attempt to appeal to as many people as possible, I think might make some people less than content with the amount of maps playable in their preferred mode. Feels like EA's relying too much on the power of branding to sell this thing, in lieu of actual value. Of course I don't actually know yet. Just quite skeptical if the value will match the price.

Avatar image for monkeyking1969
monkeyking1969

9095

Forum Posts

1241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 18

It "is" what it "is", nothing to be overjoyed about, and yet you can't fault them too much for a sober decision about what to focus on.

Want to play a campaign? Go play CoD 4: Modern Warfare, it worth another run all these years later.

Avatar image for donpureevil
donpureevil

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

i would love if they´d sell a cheap singe player stand alone version (on ps4/xb1)

the campaigns are the only thing i usually play in cod. but i´ll never pay 60€ for that.

i usually rent or borrow them.

Avatar image for i_am_lono
I_am_Lono

227

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

"...and that most of the people playing on those old platforms don't necessarily care enough about video games to follow them too closely"

Wow! This is desperately condescending! I play on the "old platforms" for the simple fact that I cannot afford a PS4 or Xbox One.

Avatar image for neoathanasius
NeoAthanasius

106

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Last night at Toys-R-Us I saw a printed out sign that said "The Wii version of Skylanders Superchargers does not include the full game, only racing." I'm sure there will be a few of those signs around when this game launches.

Also, I'm not sure why people are interpreting this article as Jeff ripping on people with old consoles? He pointed out an assumption that he had (we all have those) and then posted some comments that proved his assumption wrong. It doesn't seem like a dig at people at all.

Avatar image for bradbrains
BradBrains

2277

Forum Posts

583

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Last night at Toys-R-Us I saw a printed out sign that said "The Wii version of Skylanders Superchargers does not include the full game, only racing." I'm sure there will be a few of those signs around when this game launches.

Also, I'm not sure why people are interpreting this article as Jeff ripping on people with old consoles? He pointed out an assumption that he had (we all have those) and then posted some comments that proved his assumption wrong. It doesn't seem like a dig at people at all.

considering the wii is basically a ps2 thats actaully pretty impressive they are still supporting it. must still make some money for them

Avatar image for nime
Nime

567

Forum Posts

386

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Nime

@neozeon: Why in god's name would canceling the games altogether be a better solution? You'd rather get no game than a gimped game? That makes absolutely zero sense.

Overall this doesn't bother me. Sure it'd be sweeter if it was say $40, but any discount is appreciated, especially when you consider how many people have always payed $60 and only ever played multiplayer anyways. The new consoles have been out for two years now - I just appreciate the fact they bothered releasing an old version at all.

Avatar image for big_jon
big_jon

6533

Forum Posts

2539

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

That seems really shitty to their customer base.

If you can't put the campaign on the disk you probably shouldn't put the game out on the console, and you shouldn't be taking pre-orders before this has been announced.

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

@fisk0: Yep. Although I'm sure out of all the companies Activision will be one of the ones along with EA that still hold on to putting out cross gen versions of nearly everything. I'm glad most studios are over that. I feel more often than not that has really held back some current gen releases.

Avatar image for neoathanasius
NeoAthanasius

106

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@bradbrains: Yeah it's wild! I've actually heard the Wii version is fun, it's more like a Mario Kart game. I'm sure Toysrus must have had some complaints to make a sign about it. Ha-ha!

Avatar image for neozeon
NeoZeon

769

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By NeoZeon

@nime: Sorry, I should have phrased that better. I meant that it seems pretty messed up of them to release half the game and only give a ten dollars discount. Seems like Activision spitting in the previous generation owner's face at that point.

It was a little harsh to say there shouldn't be anything at all. Guess the barely discount rubbed me the wrong way.

Avatar image for rtoast
rtoast

33

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So the Multiplayer is worth $50 and the SP is worth $10? Can I just pay $10 and get the campaign on PS4?

Ditto.

I stopped buying COD after the first Black Ops because all I ever do is play campaign and it is seriously not worth it for 60 bucks. I told myself I'd wait until the newer ones come out and just play the old campaigns when they drop the price, but they never drop it far enough to make me feel good about the investment.

The original Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3 are still $40 on Steam, and Blops 2 and Ghosts are both still $60!

And they very rarely go on sale (and when they do, it's not for that much)

Avatar image for deactivated-60dda8699e35a
deactivated-60dda8699e35a

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@soulcake said:

COD campaigns for 10 bucks sure. Make it happen Activision !

No freaking kidding. The campaigns are the only thing I played in CoD anyway.

Avatar image for wacomole
Wacomole

1194

Forum Posts

681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@random45 said:
@soulcake said:

COD campaigns for 10 bucks sure. Make it happen Activision !

No freaking kidding. The campaigns are the only thing I played in CoD anyway.

If they put out a compilation of just the Modern Warfare/Black Ops Campaigns at a correspondingly reasonable price, I'd snap stuff that right up.

I stopped buying CoDs after MW2 but I wouldn't mind playing through the stories I missed some time (rather than the alternative of passively watching them on video). This late on, the multiplayer components of those older outings would basically be pointless anyway.

Avatar image for muty
muty

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

old consoles where outdated 3 years ago so its actually a surprise that any developer/publisher even thinks about making games for it.

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10887

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

sweep  Moderator

I don't think anyone ever goes to a developer's forums to talk about how much they like a game. Also, having spent a fair amount of time looking at internet comments, I don't know if I'd trust anyone who ever writes anything on any website, ever.

Except this one, obviously. You're welcome.

Avatar image for kagato
kagato

1162

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 7

Probably an unpopular view point but i'm kind of sick of all games i get on ps4/x1 not being as good as they could have been because people are still refusing to upgrade to the next set of consoles. This isnt a new idea, people have been upgrading their machines every generation for as long as i can remember so why its such a sticking point now i dont know. Just imagine how amazing Metal Gear could have been if it hadnt been stuck catering for last gen machines, could have been a bloody master piece!

Avatar image for corvak
Corvak

2048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Corvak

"whats next old gen wont get a box?"

If it was any other series (except maybe annual sports game) it wouldnt even warrant a release. Teams that aren't as ridiculously big as CoD can't afford to try and shove games onto those old platforms. PS4/XBO adoption rates are way higher than PS3/360 cause back then we all had to buy HDTVs so the financial cost was much more than $400 for the system.

Avatar image for trilogy
Trilogy

3241

Forum Posts

210

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

@sweep said:

I don't think anyone ever goes to a developer's forums to talk about how much they like a game. Also, having spent a fair amount of time looking at internet comments, I don't know if I'd trust anyone who ever writes anything on any website, ever.

ESPECIALLY this one, obviously. You're welcome.

Oh, ok!

Avatar image for yummytreesap
YummyTreeSap

1268

Forum Posts

306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@kagato said:

Just imagine how amazing Metal Gear could have been if it hadnt been stuck catering for last gen machines, could have been a bloody master piece!

It is a masterpiece.

Avatar image for slab64
Slab64

1149

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@fisk0 said:
@slab64 said:
@fisk0 said:

i actually just tried to play Advanced Warfare on PS3 yesterday only to find the game completely dead, not even a single TDM going on, so I kinda wonder how well a multiplayer only thing would do on that console at this point.

There are about 32k players on AW for PS3 at the moment. Almost 29k on 360. The percentage of those players who are hackers/cheaters is anyone's guess.

What modes are they playing? I can't find any "Current players" like the older games had, and I'm still getting "no games found" for every playlist but ranked matches. I tried both with wired and wireless Internet figuring something like that could mess something up, but it made no difference, and it did show "one potential match" in ranked, but which it couldn't join. Literally every other playlist says there aren't any matches going on.

Long story short, this issue is caused by fragmentation in the player base due to differences in DLC ownership. People who have no DLC for the game, or only two out of the four packs, or who don't own the Atlas Gorge map, etc are going to have a hard time finding matches. It sucks but it's part of the business realities of Call of Duty. It would be cool if they just let everybody have all the maps once the new one comes out, but I don't see that happening :/

Avatar image for fisk0
fisk0

7321

Forum Posts

74197

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 75

fisk0  Moderator

@slab64 said:
@fisk0 said:
@slab64 said:
@fisk0 said:

i actually just tried to play Advanced Warfare on PS3 yesterday only to find the game completely dead, not even a single TDM going on, so I kinda wonder how well a multiplayer only thing would do on that console at this point.

There are about 32k players on AW for PS3 at the moment. Almost 29k on 360. The percentage of those players who are hackers/cheaters is anyone's guess.

What modes are they playing? I can't find any "Current players" like the older games had, and I'm still getting "no games found" for every playlist but ranked matches. I tried both with wired and wireless Internet figuring something like that could mess something up, but it made no difference, and it did show "one potential match" in ranked, but which it couldn't join. Literally every other playlist says there aren't any matches going on.

Long story short, this issue is caused by fragmentation in the player base due to differences in DLC ownership. People who have no DLC for the game, or only two out of the four packs, or who don't own the Atlas Gorge map, etc are going to have a hard time finding matches. It sucks but it's part of the business realities of Call of Duty. It would be cool if they just let everybody have all the maps once the new one comes out, but I don't see that happening :/

I have the season pass and to my knowledge have installed all the DLC's (though the game only lists them as purchased, there's no indication of if they're installed or not).

Combat readiness is the only mode that gets me into matches, but that's the mode that adds bots if it can't find enough players, and I don't think I have seen more than 3 or 4 players that behave humanlike in a match there either, and it still takes a good 6-7 minutes to even find a game.

Avatar image for glots
glots

5171

Forum Posts

74

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm not one to enjoy the misery of others...but some part of me is still hoping to see bunch of complaning this week from people who'll be surprised to only find the multiplayer mode from their 360/PS3 copies. I'm assuming they are going to plant a very clear notification on the back of the physical box to avoid that.

Avatar image for jjbsterling
JJBSterling

633

Forum Posts

60

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@glottery: I think more last-gen users will be more frustrated with what the game looks like on their systems. There have been a few videos floating around of the Black Ops 3 multiplayer for the old consoles and it looks horrific. I haven't fired up an old Call of Duty game on a last-gen console in a long time but it looks much worse than I remember any of the other PS3/360 CoD games looking like before. Although this is ahead of release and things could hypothetically change maybe?

Avatar image for deactivated-63f899c29358e
deactivated-63f899c29358e

3175

Forum Posts

203

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I think I read somewhere that it would also only run at 30 FPS compared to the regular 60 that the current-gen versions will run at.

Avatar image for darkbeatdk
DarkbeatDK

2503

Forum Posts

330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 22

So it turns out that the 360 version is a bit "lacking in fidelity", to put it mildly. It's especially noticeable in comparison to the original Black Ops that is bundled with the game.

http://www.videogamer.com/xbox360/call_of_duty_black_ops_3/features/article/does_black_ops_3_really_look_that_bad_on_xbox_360_and_ps3.html

To put it less mildly: It looks like it was ported by the fucking Tony Hawk 5 team.