So I just finished this... definitely better than 1, I love the style of these games. I also think the game ended well, which is a feat few games accomplish these days. 4 stars and definately worth playing. Will be watching for brother hood in the 20 dollar range to pick up soon...now on to the witcher. 

So I just finished this... definitely better than 1, I love the style of these games. I also think the game ended well, which is a feat few games accomplish these days. 4 stars and definately worth playing. Will be watching for brother hood in the 20 dollar range to pick up soon...now on to the witcher. 

Cool.

I like the part where you punch a fat guy with a pointy stick.

@LordXavierBritish said:

I like the part where you punch a fat guy with a pointy stick.

yeah, the fist fight at the end was contrived but was still intersting.

Best part of the ending was when that space mayan lady said "it has to be you desmond" and turned to the camera. That was some epic shit

I took the disc out of my PC when i beat the game and rubbed it all over my private parts 

My personal feeling when I played 2 was that it deserved much more praise than it got. I basically just felt slightly different from how everyone else seemed to think of every AC game I played. Earlier in February I played 1, 2, and Brotherhood right in a row, and I liked 1 more than most people did (I actually really enjoyed the pretentious dialogue after each assassination), thought 2 was amazing and better than people already gave it credit for, and thought Brotherhood was really good but not nearly as good as near-universal acclaim would indicate. Alot of the missions in Brotherhood were really annoying (the Da Vinci war machine missions stand out as ones I had to repeat endlessly) and all in all that game stretches itself out much longer than necessary. 
 
I guess I'm just a contrarian.