I wouldn't.  But knowing I don't have to pay anything, it looks like fun.

I would. Now it just seems worse because everything won't be free. That makes it less appealing to me. i like that it looks colorful and stuff though. Like battalion wars.

Well, maybe if it had more features, but if it was a paid game as it is right now, then no, I would expect more.

So basically my answer is no.

well........maybe, but then it'd have to be on consoles

i would my friend got a beta code and has played he said is really fun 

Too be honest, no. I think that the main reason that I want it is because it's free.

possibly, looks interesting enough.

i would, for sure. its one of the few games i can play on my machine this year.
playability aside, it also seems rad regardless of the tech.

If it was a budget game, or had more content, sure, but in its current form, probably not.

i wouldnt be that excited for Hero's if i had to pay for it.
But since its free then im totally stoked

no

I would have no interest at all.

Hell, I'm nearly flat-lining already. Look- _______^______________^_____________*beeeeeeeeeeeeep*

Seriously though, I don't think the game has much of a presence even being free.

no, it looks terrible even being free.

No sir. No way at all. I think World War II, even fake World War II, is a completely tapped setting. However, since it is free, and since they're clearly trying to make this entertaining, and because it does look like a lot of fun, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

I still dont care about the game, even if it is free.

No, because then it would most likely run for a monthly fee.

And I'm not going to pay an fee for an online shooter.

If it was boxed or downloadable, I could see paying twenty to thirty bucks for it.

Though asking full price for a multiplayer only game is a bit too much.

I would, it seems like a more simple WWII TF2.

"I would, it seems like a more simple WWII TF2.
"

"Snail said:

"I would, it seems like a more simple WWII TF2."

It's actually more complex in many areas, just not many areas people will care about.

This seems like the runescape of shooters, or Wolfstien ET what have you that is now free to download."

I don't know.  I don't care about it now so I wonder what I'd think if I had to pay for something I already don't care about but could get for free.

"thabigred said:

"Snail said:

"I would, it seems like a more simple WWII TF2."

It's actually more complex in many areas, just not many areas people will care about.

This seems like the runescape of shooters, or Wolfstien ET what have you that is now free to download."

Sure you have power-ups and airplanes, but it's pretty much straight forward and you don't have as many classes. Come again, do you even have classes?
"

I don't get the point of this question.  No, I definitely wouldn't be interested in Battlefield Heroes if it wasn't free.  But if it wasn't free, it wouldn't be Battlefield Heroes.  The game is deigned around being a play-for-free game.

I would - I've been a Battlefield fan since the BF1942 demo (which was epic for it's time). Of course, I'd have much higher standards for the game if it weren't F2P.

strangeling said:

"

I would probably care more if it wasn't "free."

I wouldn't really call it a free game.  It's more like a restricted features demo.

"...there will be some paid content (i.e. extra guns, more armor...)"

To me, that quote says you will be at a severe disadvantage unless you pony up.

"

I would still care for the game because I think it's an amazing series. This plays a little more casual than the others in the series though, so I may be less willing to purchase it.

...it's free? Holy crap, my interest just been raised from excited to mad excited.

"...it's free? Holy crap, my interest just been raised from excited to mad excited."

Id say Yes i would still care. because then You could unlock stuff instead of paying for it all. Id rather get a lvl 30 dude and Unlock a lvl booster then having to pay for one. Also, funding for more maps, allowed to be on mulitple platforms.  Add at least 1 more class. I like it as is and what they have for it being free. I'm not a big fan on microtransactions.

"If it was a budget game, or had more content, sure, but in its current form, probably not."

I'm playing the beta now, it sucks.

"I'm playing the beta now, it sucks. "

"I'm playing the beta now, it sucks. "

I don't care about the game even when it's free. MIND BLOWN.