<p>I usually wait for digital foundry to do their comparison thing, but I really want to play this game. Anyone playing this on PS3 right now? How is the performance? I know the game runs UE 3, so that's why I'm a little nervous about it on PS3</p>

Following the NeoGAF thread for the game, all signs point to the PS3 being slightly better. Screen tearing being the major negative for the PS3, yet slightly better than the 360 in other aspects.

"360: Barely tears, drops frames with v-sync locked. More aggressive AA(some objects are blurry).

PS3: Tears occasionally with v-sync locked, doesn't seem to drop frames like the 360. Slightly more crisp in a side-by-side (different AA?)."

360 also seems to have some strange gamma output resulting in the game looking too dark. That said, I think the PS3 looks a touch too bright. I'd honestly take visual comparisons with a grain of salt until sites like Digital Foundry start comparing.

Bottom line, this is not BS1 on PS3 all over again. Don't fear purchasing it on the PS3 if that's your concern.

I'm interested to see how they supported the Move. Something about holding the Move controller upright whilst popping off shots on a Sky-Line sounds awesome.

@realph: It isn't. Stick to to a controller.

im on the ps3 and it looks great ! haven't had a single frame drop

If I had to play on a console, I'd still pick the one with frame drops over screen tearing.

It's playing great for me, the only thing I've really noticed is that those little mobile shops with the ads on them, and some of the signage throughout the Fairgrounds really, are very blurry up close. They look fine far away but lose a lot of fidelity up close, sort of like what it looks like when you play a game without hi-res texture packs installed?

Playing on 360 and no problems. Some tearing when I turned v-sync lock off just to see what difference it made, problem solved when turned back on.

This game... maaaan. It sort of reminds me of my experience with Chrono Cross, being amazed that they somehow figured a way to make it run on current gen hardware. I'm still baffled how parts of Chrono Cross run at all on the PS1.

Going from playing a few hours on PC to PS3 has been painful. I started my PS3 copy and besides the expected graphical downgrade, I noticed how bad the FoV is on the console. It's apparent at the beginning during Booker's baptism sequence. I checked my TV settings to make sure it wasn't zoomed in it was so bad.

Following that, the next thing to really jump out at me on the PS3 is they seem to have the bloom jacked to the maximum possible level, making some things look bright white, while others give off an ugly yellow tint. I notice in videos the 360 doesn't suffer this problem and is way better off for it. The bloom in outdoor areas is really bad, making just about everything difficult to see. Enemies at a distant are a chore with the blinding bloom as you basically see white. This is not something that can be remedied with brightness settings, or settings on your television.

Performance has been really good. 3 hours with no FPS issues and noticing only a couple instances of the screen tearing that seem to be a common complaint. Again, this bloom issue is a terrible negative, and I'm surprised it's not brought up more often when the two console versions are compared. I'm second guessing my choice of console. The 360 negatives seem like a decent tradeoff for the blinding PS3 copy.

Gamespot has a comparison video.

I've been playing on PS3/360 for awhile now and just got a new PC... first time back to PC in like 8 years. First thing I notice and from what I can see in that comparison video is the draw distance. It really makes the games look so much better. Sleeping Dogs especially looked like crap on PS3 but amazing on PC because of this.

PS3 is all I own so YES

I caved and got it on PS3 no less. Looks great although might just be me or my dualshock but the aiming doesn't seem as fluid as I'd like. Also, I turned the V-sync off. Screen tearing even with it off is not unbearable which I'd gladly trade for a better frame rate.

I find the aiming a little wonky on both PC with mouse and controller, the acceleration is a bit off I think.

Digital Foundry comparison is up. I'm surprised none of my issues were present in the article. It even goes as far as saying dialled back bloom is a consequence of improved shadows on the 360.

Maybe something's wrong with my television/PS3. Maybe I was just so spoiled by PC ultra settings, the console version looked like such utter shit in comparison. Either way, looks like DF gives the nod to the PS3 version, much like they did Tomb Raider.

I'd honestly rather be playing the console version because of the horrible stuttering on PC though.

...but I bought it on PC because of a free copy of XCOM.

Yea, I'm not experiencing any of the bloom issues you are. I was actually playing the game pretty dark for the first third or so, though. I'm never sure if I'm supposed to be taking those calibration screens literally or not but this game is DEFINITELY one to not take seriously. Until the Quick Look video I had no idea how detailed the designs on the guns were, mine always appeared mostly black. So I bumped the settings up from "barely visible" by my eyes to the middle and the game's brightness really opened up for me.

I also noticed that when I set the borders of the screen to the borders of my TV, all the HUD elements were being pushed off the screen! I figured I wasn't seeing them because the first part of the game is so quiet, but I was noticing power-ups flying off to the corners but not actually going anywhere and started to find it really odd, so I brought the edges in a little and discovered, woah, there's a HUD! I play on a 50" btw, in case that had/has anything to do with it.