@nodima said:
@wjb said:
I just got done playing Origins a month ago and surprisingly liked it (was lukewarm on City, unfortunately).
I wasn't really ready for a new Arkham game to come out this year anyway; even if it was Rocksteady.
I can live with a Q1-Q2 2015 release.
I never played Asylum, LOVED City, and I've heard the story is actually probably the best of the three in Origins. About the only negative to that game I can spot for someone in my position is the lower maximum glide height and using almost the same map layout. Given the current Batman sale on PSN, is Asylum still THAT much better a game removing your familiarity with the franchise and talking strictly mechanics, storytelling, etc?
Asylum is far more focused than City and Origins. It's far less about traversal and more about the connectivity between combat, gadgets, and stealth. It's also a little looser than City in the combat department.
If you haven't played it, I'd recommend giving it a once over. There's also like, 140 Riddler Challenges as opposed to 440 in City, so that end of it is much more doable.
I agree, I preferred the more focused approach to Asylum; a lot of people compared it to a modern Metroid game. Even if City or Origins improved certain things about the franchise (naturally), I think Asylum is still worth playing (if you have money to spare). Most of the boss fights in Asylum weren't that great, though, especially the final boss.
I enjoyed Asylum more than City, but I think a lot of it had to do with expectations. Asylum was dismissed by a lot of people (including me, probably) until a month or so before it came out, and it became the game everyone talked about that year because no one expected a Batman game from an unknown developer to be any good. When City was announced, I was under the impression it was going to be more..."open world," and was a little disappointed when it wasn't what I expected. That's on me, though. It seems like Arkham Knight might be more of what I wanted, but eh, we'll see.
I think that's why I liked Origins, because a lot of people dumped on the game because it wasn't Rocksteady (I wonder how many actually gave it a chance?) and it turned out to be a really great experience. It wasn't perfect (forget the "Why is no one on the streets?" bullshit; the real issue is "Why am I in some lame borough of Gotham City when the skybox cityscape in the background looks so much cooler to traverse?), but the story was pretty good and it went in directions that was pleasing to see.
And yeah, it shouldn't be a big deal, but having that many Riddler trophies in City kind of turned me off towards any of the side stuff in that game. I guess maybe the way Rocksteady presented it did not give me the incentive to spend more time on the game once I completed the main story? I think I got to 150 trophies, and maybe 50 more after the game. I think I looked at a guide for 20 more and then said, "I DON'T WANT TO DO THIS ANYMORE!"
Log in to comment