Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    God of War: Chains of Olympus

    Game » consists of 7 releases. Released Mar 04, 2008

    Kratos packs up and moves to the PSP in this first portable installment in the God of War series that serves as a prequel to the original.

    God of War: Chains of Olympus is still a fine game, but 9 years after release it feels utterly inessential

    Avatar image for bigsocrates
    bigsocrates

    6269

    Forum Posts

    184

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By bigsocrates

    Why play through God of War: Chains of Olympus in 2017, when I have a big backlog of highly praised current generation games and not nearly enough time to play them? I’m not 100% sure. But last night the urge to finally get to the PS3 port of this 2008 PSP title struck me, and here I sit about 24 hours later, having rolled credits on the second of Kratos’ adventures I have played through. It’s hard to think of too much interesting to say about the game itself; it’s God of War and if you don’t know whether you like that at this point it’s because you’re not interested enough to find out. I enjoyed the game more than I thought I would, and I also like the fact that I was able to play through it in essentially one day. Having a play time under 6 hours is frustrating for a $60 day one purchase (see another Ready at Dawn joint, The Order 1886, for details on this) but for a digital download that cost me $8 and came with another game, 6 hours is about the perfect length. Even then the game felt padded at points, especially towards the end where it tosses lengthy arena sections in cramped quarters back to back to back, obviously re-using assets in order to ship a game that was more than 5 hours long.

    What is notable about GoW:CoO is how irrelevant it feels in the culture. This was once a huge release, intended to drive the PSP to even greater heights in the West. It was heavily advertised and it’s one of the few games I’ve seen people play on their PSPs in public. 9 years later it feels like a footnote in a franchise that wants to break from its past, and there was grumbling recently when it was tossed in as a free PS+ game last year, since it’s not actually a VITA title.

    9 years is not that long ago. The first Iron Man movie launched in 2008 and while it’s an older film it’s hardly forgotten. Breaking Bad first aired 9 years ago and it’s still talked about all the time. But video games age differently than most media, and playing Chains of Olympus feels like excavating an artifact of the past. Not the game experience itself, which remains competent, but its place in gaming history and culture.

    It's been awhile since I spent significant time with a PS3 game, let alone a PS3 game that’s an up-rezzed version of a PSP game, and it took me a little bit of time to adjust. The first parts of the game felt very low-poly and ugly, and while I appreciated the big set-pieces they were going for and was impressed by some of the animation, I was definitely feeling some generation shock in the first hour or so.

    However, in an effect not unlike eyes adjusting to a dark room and making it seem brighter, the game looked better and better as I played it, to the point where I barely noticed the blurry textures and simplified architecture in the later parts of the game. I’ve long said that PS2 era games have aged much better than PS1, and GoW:CoO definitely proved that point to me. I was able to accept the game on its own merits and even find it impressive in places, while PS1 games mostly just look like a mess. I know this was a PSP showcase at the time, and they cleaned it up for the PS3 release, but I was still surprised at how little the dated graphics bothered me just a few hours in. I also started the game over after completing it (there’s a gold trophy for starting over in a costume, and I’m enough of a trophy-whore to grab a trivial one like that) and I was shocked at how much better the beginning looked the second time. What had looked low poly and ugly 24 hours before now just looked like video game graphics to me, nothing particularly wrong with them. My expectations had adjusted to fit what I was playing and I was able to take it on its own terms. I don’t know if someone who wasn’t playing games in the PS2 era could make the same adjustment but I’m glad I can still go back.

    While the graphics held up okay for me, and the gameplay was fine, there are some choices that must have felt questionable in 2008 and 9 years later are flat out cringe inducing. For example about half way through the first level you encounter some women you free from a cell, complete with low-poly digital nudity, and you go through one of God of War’s infamous QTE sex games with them. It’s weird and uncomfortable and not sexy, and even more so for a portable game presumably meant to be played in public. I would have shut my system off immediately if I had gotten to that part while playing on the train or bus. There is additional female nudity later in the game, and all of it feels gratuitous and skeezy. I have no problem with sexiness in games, but this doesn’t feel sexy, it feels cheap and obligatory. Also, I had to try the sequence like five times to get it right, and only did it for the trophy, which I guess makes that literal trophy-whoring. In addition to the silly sex and nudity, it’s worth noting that the game features basically no context for its story. It’s just like “Hey, you’re Kratos, the Ghost of Sparta, and a great general, now go fight hand to hand in this city, where everyone seems to know you!” You’d think that the game might contain a little bit of “on-boarding” for players who never played the PS2 original (maybe the PSP is their only PlayStation system) and a little bit of character building/scene setting. Stories have never been the best part of God of War games, but the beginning of this game is almost at SNES levels of simplicity and suddenness.

    The story does improve later, but it curiously seems to assume the whole time that the player is a God of War fan and already knows why Kratos is in servitude to the Gods and what his sins were. It’s a strange choice and I have to wonder whether it’s because Ready at Dawn was using someone else’s IP and was restricted in what they could do with it. In addition, despite the threadbare nature of the storytelling, there are times where the game overexplains itself, like when the narrator tells the player they are standing on the chariot of Helios and then Athena manifests to explain…that you are standing on the chariot of Helios. Perhaps the game is worried that PSP players might be playing in short bursts and forget what they’re supposed to do, but having objectives repeated constantly made me feel like the game thought I was an idiot.

    That’s not to say it’s a terrible game. The combat is okay, with enough magic abilities, combos, dodges, and parries to be engaging. Despite the low poly count there’s still the visceral thrill of violence that is, perhaps, the true secret to God of War’s success. The way Kratos kills the Persian king; smashing him in the head with the very chest of treasure he offered as a bribe, is both poetic and visceral. I winced at it, even though it’s far lower fidelity than the brutal killings in modern Doom or Mortal Kombat. There’s also still satisfaction to be had climbing on top of mythical beasts and mutilating them by ripping their jaws off or sinking a dagger into their eyes. Playing as Kratos has always been heavy on the power fantasy; where size or magical power can be overcome and conquered through sheer force of will and rage. That comes through in GoW:CoO, even today. And while the environments don’t feel as vast as in the main console games, that’s not to say that they don’t have anything going for them. A lot of work went into the game’s art and it shows, and there are times when the game achieves a meaningful sense of place, which is something a lot of games never do.

    One thing the game is light on is true spectacle. The first boss is a giant basilisk, but most of the rest of them are about Kratos’ size and don’t really fit in with the God of War multi-stage huge boss archtype. I am guessing this was a function of budget and PSP limitations.

    I can’t recommend God of War: Chains of Olympus. It’s…fine…but feels inessential. If you want to learn Kratos’ story prior to God of War 4 this doesn’t really tell you much about the character. He loves his daughter and he’s really angry and yells a lot even when it’s not appropriate to the scene. There. You have now gotten everything you need from this game story-wise.

    On the other hand I won’t warn anyone away from this game either. I had fun. There were some boring parts, the puzzles are too simple and there aren’t enough enemy types, but it’s still a serviceable action game and it has its moments.

    Perhaps what’s most interesting about GoW:CoO today is how it shows the disposability of certain kinds of games. This thing came out less than ten years ago and was a big blockbuster with a lot of push, and now it’s a forgotten trifle, given away for free on a dead console, its franchise looking to reboot and go in a new direction and its style hopelessly outdated. 9 years is a long time in videogame land. It’s a medium that lets its past burn away more than an other, and God of War: Chains of Olympus feels like just a little more ash on the wind. In a way that’s appropriate, but it’s also kind of sad.

    Avatar image for liquiddragon
    liquiddragon

    4314

    Forum Posts

    978

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 19

    #1  Edited By liquiddragon

    CoO I remember, like GTA: Liberty and Vice City Stories, was impressive for being technically faithful to the big boy games. Ghost of Sparta was actually the superior portable GoW. Which other GoW have you played? I wish I had stop at the first one. Great mix of accessible combat, fun puzzles, and decent story. Not even a big fan of the series but somehow I've played all but Ascension and none of them come close to the perfect balance of 1.

    Avatar image for slag
    Slag

    8308

    Forum Posts

    15965

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 45

    I still contend GoW should have been a one game series. Or they should have done what Jaffe wanted and gone to different mythologies with each entry.

    Avatar image for inresurrection
    Inresurrection

    471

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #3  Edited By Inresurrection

    Ghost of Sparta was pretty great from what I remember. It was also definitely superior to Chains of Olympus, though I have not played through either in well over seven years.

    GoW II > GoW > Ghost of Sparta > GoW III > Chains of Olympus > Ascension (which I did not finish due to it being boring.)

    Nice job on the write-up. Reminds me I would like write a piece or two once in a while on a game.

    Avatar image for thewildcard
    TheWildCard

    715

    Forum Posts

    64

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    That's the version I played to and I was unimpressed with it in...2011? Whenever it was, yeah pretty forgettable. Ghost of Sparta on the other hand is a great entry, among the best in the series imo.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5b031d0e868a5
    deactivated-5b031d0e868a5

    935

    Forum Posts

    25462

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 4

    Probably a spoiler but is that the one which ends with mashing to push away / murder (I can't remember which) your daughter at the end of the game?

    If so I agree with the sentiment that its a fine game (especially being designed for the PSP) albeit unnecessary and subpar compared to the high points of the series.

    Avatar image for nicksmi56
    nicksmi56

    922

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    It seems anything outside of the main 3 is inessential. Those are the only ones I plan on playing.

    Avatar image for arbitrarywater
    ArbitraryWater

    16104

    Forum Posts

    5585

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 66

    I always got the impression that the PSP God of War games were entirely competent and entirely optional for anyone who wasn't a mega-fan of the series. Your talk of the transitory, disposable nature of a lot of video game experiences is definitely interesting, and it's always a little nuts seeing what high-profile games of years past slip into the realms of obscurity and which ones are remarked about years later.

    Avatar image for boozak
    BoOzak

    2858

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #8  Edited By BoOzak

    @ohagan said:

    Probably a spoiler but is that the one which ends with mashing to push away / murder (I can't remember which) your daughter at the end of the game?

    If so I agree with the sentiment that its a fine game (especially being designed for the PSP) albeit unnecessary and subpar compared to the high points of the series.

    It was yeah, you leave her in what is essentially the game's version of heaven after somehow murdering everyone in it. He has a beard now though so its cool. He can be redeemed. Also 9 years is a really long time for videogames, as they evolve so quickly. TV shows and movies, not so much.

    EDIT: That was the point you were making, my bad. (I should stop skimming through long posts ;p)

    Avatar image for corwag
    Corwag

    427

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    The psp needed a triple A named game to sell the psp. That's why it was aborted into the world.

    Avatar image for slyspider
    slyspider

    1832

    Forum Posts

    14

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    To contrast this, I played my first GoW on the PSP, like beat it on all difficulties and unlocked all the stuff, and can't take that game seriously on console. It actually ruined 3 for me because I was so used to it being a mobile game, not being able to put it to sleep or carry it with me made me not want to play it. I stopped playing 3 at some point and haven't touched the series since. GoW will always be a mobile game for me.

    Granted I freely admit I'm an idiot so I'm not endorsing this viewpoint

    Avatar image for sravankb
    sravankb

    564

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Man, the PSP constantly had this problem. The games it had, while sometimes good, made you constantly think you were playing an inferior port of a console title. The PSP versions did very little to differentiate themselves from the series they came from.

    For me, the PSP was always my Monster Hunter machine - until those games came out on the 3DS, of course.

    A bit of a side note - based on what I see about Monster Hunter World, Destiny 2, and many other titles, it doesn't seem like I need a gaming system besides my PC.

    Avatar image for bigsocrates
    bigsocrates

    6269

    Forum Posts

    184

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @corwag said:

    The psp needed a triple A named game to sell the psp. That's why it was aborted into the world.

    This is kind of an unfair statement ("aborted" is a strong term to use for a game that's not bad) and also the fact that a game is intended to sell consoles certainly doesn't make it bad. F-Zero was made to show off mode 7. Sonic CD was made to sell Sega CDs. Just because something has a commercial purpose doesn't make it a bad game.

    Avatar image for csl316
    csl316

    17004

    Forum Posts

    765

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    It was ok at the time, but I enjoyed Ghost of Sparta more than 3.

    Avatar image for glots
    glots

    5171

    Forum Posts

    74

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By glots

    Played that and Ghost of Sparta on PS3 when they put out the Origins collection. CoO felt kinda like the first GoW in portable form, which I thought was still pretty clunky. Ghost of Sparta felt as good to play as God of War 2, though (which I guess makes sense, since it came out after two...).

    Avatar image for oursin_360
    OurSin_360

    6675

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #17  Edited By OurSin_360

    I never bothered to play the portable games as to me they always seemed non essential.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.