Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    PlayStation Network

    Concept »

    The online service used on the PlayStation 4, PlayStation 3, PlayStation Portable and PlayStation Vita.

    PlayStation Plus Subscription Launched

    • 147 results
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Avatar image for dimil0c0
    Dimil0c0

    26

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #101  Edited By Dimil0c0

    That's just moronic and ridiculous. If you cancel you subscription you stop having access to those free games. So you practically rent the games that are free for 50$. Most of these games are older games you would be able to buy online for 15-20$. Little big planet costs less then 15 Euro , that's not even 20$. And like Captain_clayman said they don't even offer cross game chat , that's what gamers care about.

    Avatar image for samaritan
    Samaritan

    1730

    Forum Posts

    575

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #102  Edited By Samaritan
    @get2sammyb said:

    " @Progn0sticator said:

    " You had me Sony, I was on-board, $50 for 15 months, okay, I'll spit game and see what you've got. You had me Sony, almost. Then I remembered that all I was doing was renting this shit, to which I verbally exclaimed "FUCK THAAAT." "
    You mean like you would movies? What's the big deal? "
     The big deal is ownership of content. Unlike with movies, games, for the vast majority of us, cannot be fully enjoyed in one sitting like a movie can. There's a process of investing time over the course of a week, a month, a year or longer into a game, and the idea of having to pay a fee forward to continue to enjoy something which you already invested time into is silly. I liken it to being held hostage; I pay the $50 up front, I get Wipeout HD, 15 months from now I can no longer access the game I dedicated tons of time into from that point on. It'd be different if this were similar to a subscription-based music service, with complete access to the Playstation Store's library of games for a monthly fee. But since Sony is the one handpicking a single game per month, there's no guarantee the next 14 games after Wipeout won't be complete garbage. Which is why I'll just stick to buying my games ala carte. 
    Avatar image for arkanoid78
    arkanoid78

    5

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #103  Edited By arkanoid78

    If you think of it as a game rental service and you actually want to play the games they offer, then its exceptional value.  If you don't like the games, hey don't sign up and continue as normal buying the games you want to play.  Simples.

    Avatar image for deactivated-57beb9d651361
    deactivated-57beb9d651361

    4541

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    @get2sammyb:@get2sammyb said:

    "I managed to find $10 worth of content I don't have for this month, I'm sure there's stuff people don't have). $10 over the span of 12 months equates to $120. Let's be fair, and factor in that Sony has a couple of bum-months where there's NOTHING you haven't got/want. That's $100.  So you pay $50 and get $100 worth (at least!) of stuff to play. Deal? It seems like a complete no-brainer to me."

    No deal. None at all. Looking through the list of "Free content" 
     

    PSN Games

     

    PS1 Classics

     

    PlayStation Minis

     

    DLC

    • Cuboid Booster Pack
    • Cuboid Bundle Pack
    • Cuboid Level Editor
    • Magic Orbz Booster Pack
    • Magic Orbz Jungle Pack
    • Mahjong Tale: Ancient Wisdom Booster Pack
    • Smash Cars Virus-Run AddOn
    • Warhawk Fallen Star Pack 
     

    Premium Themes

    • Collision Theme
     

    Avatar Items

     
    I own Wipeout and inFamous (not even considering that you don't even get to keep Wipeout should your subscription end) and the rest I have absolutely no interest in and do not want for the sole reaon of it being discounted. The DLC may have swayed me if it was for something more worthwhile; Avatar items and Premium themes are filler (and poor filler at that). Given that this is the opening pack, you'd have thought it may have carried a little more weight. 
     
    The $10 dollars of stuff I'm getting every month? That isn't a free ten dollars. That is exactly what your subscription is. You are paying for "stuff" - to quote Penny Arcade. 
     
    In fact: here. Check out the article that goes with it too. Very valid points, all.
     
    Now, I'm not dismissing it entirely. I can see some people reaping benefits; particularly those who constantly delve into the online store. But to really make it worthwhile, you have to be spending over and above what the subscription costs per month/year in order to save anything.
     
    For me in specifically, since you replied to me? No, it would be yet another unnecessary expense on my statement and I would get very little new worthwhile content for what I'm actually paying.
     
    Peace.
    Avatar image for get2sammyb
    get2sammyb

    6686

    Forum Posts

    1993

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #105  Edited By get2sammyb
    @Progn0sticator: But you do still have access to the game. I'm going to assume that it keeps your save on record. So you have two choices - resubscribe and get another 12 months of Wipeout HD on PSPlus, or drop on the PlayStation Store and buy the game outright. It's just like movie rental. Say I rent the Dark Knight. I have it to do as I wish for a week. I watch it. I want to watch it again, so I either buy it outright or rent it for another week.
     
    This concept has been in place since the foundations of finance. I don't see the big deal.
     
    @GetEveryone: Which is totally fair enough. The service totally isn't for you and you're best waiting until it offers something that does appeal to you or continue ignoring its existence. That's the beauty of it. My main concern was that you said the service offers very little, which I just straight out disagree with. On a personal basis, maybe that's how you feel, but its wrong to suggest there's no value in this. There is plenty.
    Avatar image for razoric
    Razoric

    15

    Forum Posts

    51

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #106  Edited By Razoric

    I love how they put a "+" beside your name.  It's like a mark of shame for people who like to flush money down the toilet.

    Avatar image for mightymightyme
    mightymightyme

    38

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #107  Edited By mightymightyme

    I really think some Sony Execs are kicking themselves for not charging for multiplayer online access. They would at least have a compelling selling point.

    Avatar image for hallgren
    hallgren

    36

    Forum Posts

    231

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #108  Edited By hallgren

    I have to say that I am pleased with what Sony has done. I know there are skeptics looking at this as renting the product and if you are only going to subscribe for a year or two then this might not be for you. I intend to keep my subscription just like I do with my XBox live subscription. I love what XBox has done and the product and community that they created. Sony knows that they had to step up to the plate and offer something more while keeping the comparable online service to XBox free. I have already downloaded wipeout and will download Rally Cross onto my psp today. As new content becomes available I will add that to my collection as well. Being a psp/ps3 owner the content possibilities have a chance to be great. I love playing the classic ps one games on my psp and have even purchased some minis as well, not to mention some demos and hopefully some really cool beta opportunities (Final FantasyXIV please). If this is not for you then that's okay but don't say this is a bad thing, lets see what the coming months bring to the table and then make your comments, as for now it's off to a good start!
    Avatar image for mast
    MAST

    891

    Forum Posts

    666

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #109  Edited By MAST
    @88Fingers said:
    " Nope. Never. Not in a million years.  This doesn't fix the "ass" experience that is called psn.  Online multi-player will still suck.  Friends infrastructure will still suck. Trophies are still useless.  Give us a new Dash Board that shows trophies and friends online and what they are playing.  If you're gonna' copy XBOX LIVE ... do it properly! Offering early demos and discounted games is not gonna' get anyone to pay a yearly fee. Sorry Sony, it's too late to start charging for something that's been free for years.  We'll see the numbers in 5 years.  My guess....XBOX LIVE  GOLD members  = approx.  40 million Playstation Plus members = under 1 million.    Man, Sony has done nothing but copy everyone else this console generation.  This is why every time I turn on my PS3 I have to wipe off an inch of dust from non use. "
     
     
    That's just about the most clueless, fanboy drivel I have ever seen. I'm not even going to waste my time responding to it.
    Avatar image for citizenkane
    citizenkane

    10894

    Forum Posts

    29122

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 106

    #110  Edited By citizenkane

    Meh, I already am paying for Xbox Live and I do pretty much all of my multiplayer gaming on my Xbox 360 anyway.

    Avatar image for vitamin_dei
    Vitamin_Dei

    200

    Forum Posts

    24

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #111  Edited By Vitamin_Dei

    I think they on the right track in theory. The main reason people pay for Live is the online gaming, since they offer that for free they know they need to offer something else to justify the cost of the service... they just don't seem to have hot that sweet spot just yet. I may decide to give Plus a try, but first they need to make it a bit more than a severely limited PSN version of Gametap.

    Avatar image for knightlyknave
    knightlyknave

    121

    Forum Posts

    20

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #112  Edited By knightlyknave

    I could be less impressed, but not by much.
     
    I'd rather have the ability to hand pick the good games I want from PSN rather than get shoveled garbage that I will feel I should take because I'm already paying for it. I have tons of games on the go. I can see if I was bored and didn't have anything to play that this would insure I always have things, but that's totally not the case.

    Avatar image for allenv86
    AllenV86

    153

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #113  Edited By AllenV86

    i got an email ( i live in europe so i don't know if its the same in the US and other regions ) saying that if you bought a plus subscription ( for 1 year, so 49,99 € ) befor the 3rd of august you would be able to download Littlebigplanet for free ,  link to page explaining plus and availbable content ( in dutch )
     
    i think i'm going to go Plus ( prolly this weekend )
     
    grtz Allen :p

    Avatar image for digi7als3lf
    Digi7alS3lf

    96

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #114  Edited By Digi7alS3lf

    I'm going for the annual suscription.
    Here in Argentina i might be one of the few whose PSP is not hacked, and the PSOne Classics and Minis alone are worth the price.

    Avatar image for vigorousjammer
    vigorousjammer

    3020

    Forum Posts

    66164

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 14

    User Lists: 41

    #115  Edited By vigorousjammer

    so, for the free stuff... do you need to stay subscribed?
    or could I essentially sign up for 3 months, get the free stuff and never sign up again?

    Avatar image for darthb
    DarthB

    273

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #116  Edited By DarthB

    I got it as soon as I saw it.  I wanted wipout hd so it seemed good for now.  I'm hoping that more people I know get this so we'll always have a decent pool games in common with at least a few having multiplayer.  I'd also love it if this somehow led to sony improving their online functionality and ease of use for things like patches.
    Now, what can I expect microsoft to do so they can match this service?  Probably nothing in the near future but maybe by years end?

    Avatar image for a_faceless_name
    A_Faceless_Name

    172

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #117  Edited By A_Faceless_Name
    @Vigorousjammer said:
    " so, for the free stuff... do you need to stay subscribed? or could I essentially sign up for 3 months, get the free stuff and never sign up again? "
    The PS3 store games would be gone, but any DLC you keep. So, I will Lose Wipeout, but since I owned Magic Ball and Cuboid, I Will keep the expansions. You will likely lose the PS1 Classics and Minis too, but I didn't see anything about that.
    Avatar image for soothsayergb
    SoothsayerGB

    1500

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #118  Edited By SoothsayerGB

    Thats some costly nothing, since PS3 has NO GAMES!   Your paying for Trials, beta's and demos IF and when they happen.  
     
    Protip! If you have to pay for a discount, ITS NOT A DISCOUNT!

    Avatar image for pulledabrad
    PulledaBrad

    631

    Forum Posts

    54

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #119  Edited By PulledaBrad

    Why is all this junk clogging up my blu-ray player?

    Avatar image for charlessurge
    CharlesSurge

    127

    Forum Posts

    39

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #120  Edited By CharlesSurge

    Seems that Sony's trying to get subscription hooks into people; I'm not interested. Also, 2 smart folks out of my 7 have subscribed.

    Avatar image for a1gaius
    a1gaius

    28

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #121  Edited By a1gaius
    @PulledaBrad said:
    " Why is all this junk clogging up my blu-ray player? "
    QFFT
    Avatar image for piranesi
    Piranesi

    467

    Forum Posts

    20

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 6

    #122  Edited By Piranesi

    This feels a bit desperate of Sony - they don't want to segment the market and so have played it safe. Not really offering anything of value to the fanboy / girl (apart from the odd bit of DLC or Mini they may have missed).  
     
    Wipeout and Little Big Planet are top notch but, given the paucity of regular decent content from PSN, most of the hardcore will have them already. Paying for demos, betas and auto-updates is not a good sign either. 
     
    It had to happen but I wish the money went towards making the service comparable to XBL. I would be happy to pay out but give me something a bit more substantial.
    Avatar image for afroman269
    Afroman269

    7440

    Forum Posts

    103

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #123  Edited By Afroman269

    Don't use my PS3 enough to justify paying for this and even if I did, the benefits are just not that great right now.

    Avatar image for toyboxx
    TOYBOXX

    327

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 1

    #124  Edited By TOYBOXX
    @SoothsayerGB said:

    " Thats some costly nothing, since PS3 has NO GAMES!   Your paying for Trials, beta's and demos IF and when they happen.    Protip! If you have to pay for a discount, ITS NOT A DISCOUNT! "

    PS3 has no games?! YOUR FUCKING STUPID! Obviously you don't get out from under your fanboy rock that often.
    Avatar image for dirtyword
    dirtyword

    10

    Forum Posts

    6

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #125  Edited By dirtyword

    It's impossible to 'continue reading this story' on the iPhone app I paid money for.

    Avatar image for dieseldave
    DieselDave

    31

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #126  Edited By DieselDave

    What happened to Qore? When do we get our free episodes? 
    Avatar image for nettacki
    Nettacki

    1333

    Forum Posts

    74

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #127  Edited By Nettacki
    @mightymightyme said:
    " I really think some Sony Execs are kicking themselves for not charging for multiplayer online access. They would at least have a compelling selling point. "
    Nah. They'd be pissing off FAR more people than right now if they charged for online multiplayer.
    Avatar image for thephenomenal1
    ThePhenomenal1

    481

    Forum Posts

    215

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #128  Edited By ThePhenomenal1

    if they offered twice as much free content up front then it would be worth it. by now mortal kombat 2 should just be free to the 6 or 7 ps3 owners who still haven't bought it.

    Avatar image for damnboyadvance
    damnboyadvance

    4216

    Forum Posts

    1020

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 20

    User Lists: 4

    #129  Edited By damnboyadvance
    @SoothsayerGB said:
    " Protip! If you have to pay for a discount, ITS NOT A DISCOUNT! "
    But if you are still saving money, it's still a discount.
     
    Also, I don't think there is enough content yet to convince me to pay for it. I mean, PSN in whole is very lacking in content for me, so I don't yet see the advantage of buying PlayStation Plus.
    Avatar image for haggis
    haggis

    1674

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 1

    #130  Edited By haggis

    As I've hinted before, this service (for $50/year) brings PSN in line with what is offered in Xbox Live Gold (occasional free games, early demos, etc.). Except the real pressure to actually pay a fee is the online gaming, which PSN already gives for free. So I'm not sure how appealing this is. Everyone I know with a PS3 is basically laughing at this. Sony will no doubt get quite a few takers, but for $50 they need to offer something more substantial. :/
     
    If this is some sort of half-step toward a fee for the entire service, that would be bad. I doubt Sony will do it (this generation), but it's a signal that pay-to-play online is in all our futures.

    Avatar image for bestusernameever
    BestUsernameEver

    5026

    Forum Posts

    347

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @Scooper said:
    " I don't see the point of this right now. You pay $50 dollars a year and.... you don't get anything that exciting or nessasary. "
    It's new, give it three months to add shit. XBOX live for even 360 was lackluster until more updates came out.
    Avatar image for kagekage
    kagekage

    722

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #132  Edited By kagekage
    @TOYBOXX said:

    " @SoothsayerGB said:

    " Thats some costly nothing, since PS3 has NO GAMES!   Your paying for Trials, beta's and demos IF and when they happen.    Protip! If you have to pay for a discount, ITS NOT A DISCOUNT! "

    PS3 has no games?! YOUR FUCKING STUPID! Obviously you don't get out from under your fanboy rock that often. "
    http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/6/9/633801847724396865-FlameShield.jpg
    Avatar image for ravensword
    ravensword

    4330

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #133  Edited By ravensword

    IF I downloaded most of my stuff off PSn, then this would probayl be a great deal. But I balance my time adn money between a 360 and a PS3, so I really dont think this appeals to me that much yet, and I think thats whats going to hurt SONY on this. Only the hardest of hardcore PS3 gamers are probaly going to go for this, while Live is a more easier pill to swallow for everyone.  
    Avatar image for nicolenomicon
    nicolenomicon

    892

    Forum Posts

    4464

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 8

    #134  Edited By nicolenomicon

    Fuck no.

    Avatar image for rook538
    rook538

    38

    Forum Posts

    8

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #135  Edited By rook538

     I might actually get this. I have only two games off the PSN, so the monthly offerings will probably have some value (at least the full game ones). I trust Sony to put out good games, or I'm sure they know that the service will flop really, really fast. I don't care if I'm just "renting" the free games, if I like the service I'll keep the subscription up. If it flops, I can just buy the games I really want to play again anyways. But seriously, $50 isn't that much, and I might be willing to take the risk.    

    Avatar image for wintersnowblind
    WinterSnowblind

    7599

    Forum Posts

    41

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #136  Edited By WinterSnowblind

    I can't really buy into this system, I'm not fond of paying for XBL, but it at least provides you with a service.  I think Penny-Arcade really nailed this on the head with their latest strip, all you're doing is paying for 'free games'.  Ones that disappear once you stop subscribing anyway.
     
    Chances are you're only going to be interested in some of the titles, on certain months anyway.  So why not just keep the money and buy the games you do want?

    Avatar image for mikefightnight
    MikeFightNight

    1227

    Forum Posts

    4905

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #137  Edited By MikeFightNight

    I'll take a Pass for now... 
     
    If they wanted to sell this thing they should of offered a 60 minuet demo of Infamous 2 or some other big upcoming game that was an exclusive to PLUS. 
     
    Everything they offer now is meh at best, plus I already own Wipeout HD.

    Avatar image for bloopa79aus
    Bloopa79Aus

    134

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #138  Edited By Bloopa79Aus

      I am thinking of paying for a year. As a show of support to the company that at least tried to give gamers the ability to play games online for free and have at that. 
      I think the only reason that it cost you to play games on live when it was first released was because they wanted to cover the costs of bandwidth for demos and vids and knew that if people got to play games with friends for free no one would pay because there was no such things as extra content to make it worth it. 
      Now days that they have a lot more services to offer they should give us gamers our play for free and just charge us for the premium content like party chat and match making and video services or early access to demos . As only a casual gamer that wants to only play a few games a year online with my mates we just don't bother. So I am not talking my mates into joining me on the ps3 as they at least offer the basics for free.

    Avatar image for bloopa79aus
    Bloopa79Aus

    134

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #139  Edited By Bloopa79Aus

    something I would like paying is some bandwidth priorities . So I can download movies and games at a reasonable speed . Something I am yet to experience

    Avatar image for munmon
    munmon

    16

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #140  Edited By munmon

    Next... Online Games like Xbox Live?

    Avatar image for hamz
    Hamz

    6900

    Forum Posts

    25432

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 5

    #141  Edited By Hamz

    Someone really needs to sit down and list the difference betweens PSN and XBL so I can finally understand why everyone keeps demanding PSN start offering the same feature set as XBL. As someone who doesn't own a 360 or ever had the opportunity to pay close attention too it I'm always confused a little by the debate.
     
    As far as I'm concerned PSN+ seems like it could be a solid service provided Sony can keep the PSN Store updated regularly with lots of games. It feels like PSN+ is more of an addition to PSN than a requirement like XBL subscriptions often comes across. It seems for those who don't subscribe to PSN+ then nothing actually changes for them, they don't suddenly lose features or find there are restrictions to the PSN service. But from my basic understanding there are restrictions in place for non-Gold XBL subscribers, correct?
     
    Personally I get the impression that PSN+ is about providing interactive content for your enjoyment while XBL is about providing a higher class experience for online and so forth.
     
    Apples & Oranges if you will. I don't get why everyone is shitting on PSN+ myself. It's not mandatory, this is not something you need to subscribe too in order to play games online with your friends through a P2P service like XBL.

    Avatar image for blazingwookie
    blazingwookie

    213

    Forum Posts

    5623

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 10

    #142  Edited By blazingwookie

    Better deals needed - and Free Games access ends if you don't renew your subscription? 
    no thanks

    Avatar image for boiglenoight
    Boiglenoight

    605

    Forum Posts

    154

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #143  Edited By Boiglenoight

    Steam is schooling both XBL and PS Plus.  Sooner or later someone's going to come out with a console experience that uses Steam or something like it as a digital distribution portal.   
     
    Google, Valve, team up on this.

    Avatar image for nickystixx
    nickystixx

    227

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #144  Edited By nickystixx

    sounds pretty decent for 50 bucks. i would probably do this if i had a ps3. cant wait to see what next months free games will be.

    Avatar image for roddykat
    Roddykat

    288

    Forum Posts

    62

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #145  Edited By Roddykat

    You know, it would have been really nice if they had rolled in the recently announced Hulu subscription thing into this. That would have been a great value add, but I know better.

    Avatar image for cikame
    cikame

    4474

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #146  Edited By cikame

    I'm not totally comfortable with being given "free games" that are neither free nor actually owned by me.
     
    But i don't have a ps3 so i don't have to think about it.

    Avatar image for bouke
    Bouke

    1400

    Forum Posts

    11

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 15

    #147  Edited By Bouke

    Man, this is such a rip off, i would consider PSN+ with good "free" games and DLC and the option to keep the games after your supscribtion ends.
    Avatar image for gnarfman
    gnarfman

    14

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #148  Edited By gnarfman

    OMG! Playstation Plus. Can't wait for this................

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.