Something went wrong. Try again later

_k1_

This user has not updated recently.

255 31266 187 128
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

EQ2 offering new free to play servers - EverQuest II Extended

SOE revealed "EverQuest II Extended" as a free to play service with optional micro-transactions and optional subscriptions.  There have been a number of titles going F2P, most recently LoTRO, but unlike Turbine, SOE seem to want to add F2P alongside their traditional subscription model.
  
Free players in EQ2x will have access to all of the game except for the most recent expansion (which mostly focused on end-game content) and eighty character levels, though with limited race and class selection.  There are also limited levels of spells and gear, as well as bag and coin restrictions.  Some of this can be alleviated by purchasing new races and classes; it also looks like paying a one-time $10 fee will lessen some of the restrictions. 
 
The only way to totally unlock all content is by subscribing -- either $15/mo ("gold") or $200/yr  ($16.66/mo)  ("platinum").  The higher figure for the yearly subscription seems odd, but platinum subscribers do get free access to the Sentinel's Fate expansion, as well as $5 in Station Cash (SOE's micro-transaction currency) each month.  That said, I don't see anyone paying that.
 
What's more is that according to the membership matrix, gold members, who pay the same $15/mo cost as subscribers to regular EQ2, won't be able to have access to Sentinel's Fate, and neither gold nor platinum will have access to more than 4 races (out of 19 total races in the game) without paying for them.  It just doesn't seem like a good deal.  And although subscribers to 'regular' EQ2 will be able to copy (not transfer) their characters to EQ2x servers, the reverse is not true -- much like EQ2's LiveExchange-enabled servers, character movement is one-way.

4 Comments

4 Comments

Avatar image for _k1_
_k1_

255

Forum Posts

31266

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

Edited By _k1_

SOE revealed "EverQuest II Extended" as a free to play service with optional micro-transactions and optional subscriptions.  There have been a number of titles going F2P, most recently LoTRO, but unlike Turbine, SOE seem to want to add F2P alongside their traditional subscription model.
  
Free players in EQ2x will have access to all of the game except for the most recent expansion (which mostly focused on end-game content) and eighty character levels, though with limited race and class selection.  There are also limited levels of spells and gear, as well as bag and coin restrictions.  Some of this can be alleviated by purchasing new races and classes; it also looks like paying a one-time $10 fee will lessen some of the restrictions. 
 
The only way to totally unlock all content is by subscribing -- either $15/mo ("gold") or $200/yr  ($16.66/mo)  ("platinum").  The higher figure for the yearly subscription seems odd, but platinum subscribers do get free access to the Sentinel's Fate expansion, as well as $5 in Station Cash (SOE's micro-transaction currency) each month.  That said, I don't see anyone paying that.
 
What's more is that according to the membership matrix, gold members, who pay the same $15/mo cost as subscribers to regular EQ2, won't be able to have access to Sentinel's Fate, and neither gold nor platinum will have access to more than 4 races (out of 19 total races in the game) without paying for them.  It just doesn't seem like a good deal.  And although subscribers to 'regular' EQ2 will be able to copy (not transfer) their characters to EQ2x servers, the reverse is not true -- much like EQ2's LiveExchange-enabled servers, character movement is one-way.

Avatar image for mattdementous
MattDementous

113

Forum Posts

740

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Edited By MattDementous

I can say, first hand, that Everquest II Extended is not very restrictive--It's got more features than most free-to-play MMORPG games. Also, the graphics have aged very nicely, with regular updates. It's not as pretty as Age Of Conan, but for a game released originally in 2004, it looks amazing. No two characters are ever alike, visually or statistically. The playerbase has exploded too, which is awesome! Try it, it's not a big client, it downloads as you play.

Avatar image for cowmuffins
CowMuffins

1781

Forum Posts

435

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By CowMuffins

I played this last week. It sucks.

Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

Everquest II was terrible. Vanguard was a much better successor to EQ, from what I saw.