This probably won't go over well, but here goes nothing.
A consumer has no more "right" to a product than the producer has the "right" to the consumer's money. The producer offers a product for a given price and terms, and the consumer decides whether to buy or not. That's all there is. There is no "Just Price", no objective absolute you can point to and declare what a game or system is intrinsically worth. And exactly who would decide these values for everyone?
Lots of people buy Call of Duty every year for $60 plus DLC packs. I don't. They're not wrong, and neither am I. It's worth it to them, not to me. There's nothing else to it, no Good vs. Evil here.
It's very possible I won't be getting an Xbox One. Things can change, but it just hasn't yet appealed to me. But that doesn't equate to a moral, ethical, or spiritual failure on Microsoft's part. The only failure is in their product not appealing to me as one potential customer, but it might very well appeal to another person. If they appeal to enough people, they succeed. If they don't, they won't.
The underlying sentiment behind most of the Xbox One reactions is what's most disturbing: a belief that these electronic devices are in some way owed to us, and therefore any terms, prices or features that we don't want are considered tantamount to attempted theft. That mindset is self-defeating and inevitably encourages an attitude of perpetual victimhood, and so it's little wonder why people react with unhealthy rage when an entertainment device might not live up to their expectations.
Log in to comment