I did enjoy it, but as a bunch of people said before there is an edit that exists in my mind that would make me enjoy the movie a lot more. It wasn't just that the movie was simply too long, but also the ways in which it spent some of that time. The long panning shots and the vangelis music that was so iconic in the first movie was used a lot, the long silent shots of people standing in silent contemplation. There was a lot to take in, and I think that the thing people forget is that it was effective and novel in the first movie because it came before the new movie. Seeing a lot of the same shots and style replicated (heh) undercut the fact that it wasn't entirely original and they kind of used the same tricks more than once in the sequel of a movie that already used those tricks.
And to touch on the plot itself, some of it did feel kind loosely tied together. This was even further exacerbated by the before mentioned long style shots interspersed by short, and what I thought were some heavy handed dialogue scenes.
Also, if we can talk about the larger plot of the movie, the temptation to talk about a robot uprising on the scale that they do at the end, COMPLETELY misses the mark of what made the first movie so beautiful in that it was a small group of replicants that were not out to change the world, but just coming to terms with their mortality and the unfairness of the world. Rutger Hauer didn't have romantic aspirations about overthrowing the government and turning society on its head, and that made for a way more intimate story by the end of it.
It was a fine movie, but it played too close to the original to be anything but a pretty good followup, which is fair considering its the sequel to what is almost unarguably a seminal science fiction film.
Log in to comment