@sear said:
1. "This game is better because Rockstar sold more copies?" Where did I say that.
Interesting how you attempt to make an argument that success is based on number of copies sold, when I've never made an argument countering, or agreeing with that. This discussing is going to be very tricky if you can't read.
2. Do you need to play it to understand the tone? If that was true, every noir would be a parody of itself. That again, was a pretty stupid thing to say.
3. Well I guess you haven't watched any videos then. Because I've seen how the graphic novel sessions look.
4. LMFAOLOLROFLLMAO
5. Yea, Max Payne 1. You know? Why were all here? Thats the third reply of yours that suggest you aren't quite competent enough for me to reply after this.
6.You know it isn't primarily developed for PC how? Thats the fourth.
7. "Seriously, you're stooping to Metacritic ratings as a measure of quality?" Who said I was was? Thats response number five. I didn't say it was a measure of quality. I was saying if it was such a failure clearly the majority of the industry would agree with you. Should we all just assume you are right because its your opinion? Your logic is flawed.
8. "What next, are you going to start linking to VGChartz pages too?" Don't even know what that is, but great diss, I'm super hurt now. (Thats number six)
9. "I'm not really sure how Grand Theft Auto IV is "revolutionary." I'm not really sure either, but hey thats what almost every single reviewer wrote down in their reviews when it came out. Unlike you, I don't use my own opinion as a means of determining right or wrong.
9. If thats the best innovation you can think of, you clearly did not play it, so the discussion is irrelevant. I simply can't tolerate people playing dumb (though based on six of your posts so far, you aren't playing).
10. I guess you can't read, I said: "Name one open world game that has done better in any other way shape or form." Which every single game you just mentioned hasn't, nor did you make a logical argument how. (I'm going to call that number seven, since you didn't even read)
11. "What is this nebulous measure of quality we're supposed to be using here anyway, other than just "it scored higher"?" Apparently you believe your opinion is substantial enough? I haven't voiced mine yet, but if thats how we are determined who is correct here, I'll consider it.
12. "Why the hell am I still having a conversation with someone who thinks Metacritic scores are a good measure of a game's integrity?"
Why do I reply to someone who is clearly stupid? Why do I reply to someone who can't even read the post he is replying to? Why am I replying to someone who thinks his opinion outweighs the opinion of thousands? Why do I reply to someone who is questioning their response itself?
Finally, thats definitely number eight, questioning why you are responding to me. But since you asked me personally, its because you are an idiot. You didn't realize before you posted that you had no argument, yet because of the fact that your ego is massive, you had to swoop down to protect it, without thinking first. That to me personally, is the definition of an idiot.
Because I think kids like you are hilarious, and clearly need a little bit of education. I get to teach and have a good laugh at the same time.
Now you go.
Log in to comment