I think a lot of this comes from people's lack of understanding of fidciary duties (the legal duty of a fiduciary [EA] to act in the best interests of the beneficiary [Disney and investors/shareholders]). EA executives have a fiduciary duty to shareholders to maximize both profits and investor returns. It's why loot box are going no where anytime soon, if they can maximize profits, that's what they'll do... until they hit a point on a chart where they see a decline where loot boxes (or whatever) hurt their overall profits. It's why so many games are adding them... even in games where they don't make sense.
I have comcast (i don't have a choice, as it's the only ISP). So, yes, I have a bandwidth cap... and i refuse to pay them blood money ($50/month) for unlimited.
reading through twitter, i'm super disappointed in the number for people who care more about the fate NeoGAF than the alleged* sexual assault that took place. "evillore needs to do the right thing..." bullshit the right thing is not allegedly* committing sexual assault.
I took a lizard with water and corruption and zombie (poison heals). I can make it rain, turn the rain into poison, and turn it set it on fire... which sounds great, but it crates a ton of poison all over the ground, which is bad for allies/non hostile NPC (that turned hostile), and it makes fighting the undead a real pain in the butt as it's constantly healing them over time. back to the drawing board for me.
@stonyman65: I totally agree with you. What Campo is doing is scary (because it's 100% legal). Some people, like Pewdiepie, have the funds to take it to court and actually fight it. However, something Ryan Morrison (the Video Game Attorney) points out is: a common tactic that lawyers use is to draw out the case if they think the other side can't afford their attorney. I think most of us would just be fucked...
Log in to comment