Something went wrong. Try again later

Pepsiman

英語圏のゲームサイトだからこそ、ここで自分がはるかの旗を掲げなければならないの。

2815 28072 98 588
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

And now for the non-review-y reflection on Valkyria Chronicles.

Beings as I don't have a paycheck attached to the hobby, I write reviews of games when I feel the opinions I have on them can contribute something new to the discussions. If I'm lucky, timing isn't a huge issue; when I get games brand new at release, more often than not, I'll write up a review on it because it's still fresh in a lot of people's minds and therefore not everything about it has necessarily been said. As a game gets older, things get more ambiguous on that front. When I finally bought a PS3 Slim recently, for example, I also bought and finished a copy of MGS4 with it. I really, really, really enjoyed that game and now agree with a lot of assessments that it was indeed one of 2008's best, but when it came time for a review, I decided against doing one. I like a lot of Kojima's stuff, but years after they're released, it's hard to come up with new material that hasn't already been rehashed and analyzed to death. Kojima knows his cinematography. He knows his dialog and over the top plots. He (now) knows how to make his gameplay be complete experiences on their own, too. But those are given points when a lot of people talk about his games and if there's one thing I hate doing when it comes to writing, it's being redundant. It feels tedious and if other people have already expressed the exact same views I have about something, chances are pretty high that they've done so at least as well as I could. Such are the sorts of roadblocks I tend to run into when deciding whether to review a game I played that didn't come out that same year.
 
That's usually not the case with more obscure releases and why I'm more consistent covering them in review form when I feel the inspiration to do so. Games like Okami and Beyond Good & Evil naturally have their followings, but they're not nearly as huge as what the mainstream stuff attaches, so even when I play older stuff, I'm usually still fairly motivated to give them a review, despite their age. Unless it's absurdly old stuff like Hebereke. That game is pretty great, but dude, don't ask me to do a Famicom game review. I'm not the Angry Video Game Nerd for a reason.
 
But yeah, that brings me to my review of Valkyria Chronicles. It's an SRPG on the PS3 and a pretty great one at that. It did enough things right that I definitely intend to buy the sequel when it makes its way to the States this summer. But if I go any further than that, I'll just be repeating what I said in my review. You did just read everything I had to say on being redundant, after all, even if I'm ironically doing just that by bringing it up. Again.

11 Comments

11 Comments

Avatar image for pepsiman
Pepsiman

2815

Forum Posts

28072

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 28

Edited By Pepsiman

Beings as I don't have a paycheck attached to the hobby, I write reviews of games when I feel the opinions I have on them can contribute something new to the discussions. If I'm lucky, timing isn't a huge issue; when I get games brand new at release, more often than not, I'll write up a review on it because it's still fresh in a lot of people's minds and therefore not everything about it has necessarily been said. As a game gets older, things get more ambiguous on that front. When I finally bought a PS3 Slim recently, for example, I also bought and finished a copy of MGS4 with it. I really, really, really enjoyed that game and now agree with a lot of assessments that it was indeed one of 2008's best, but when it came time for a review, I decided against doing one. I like a lot of Kojima's stuff, but years after they're released, it's hard to come up with new material that hasn't already been rehashed and analyzed to death. Kojima knows his cinematography. He knows his dialog and over the top plots. He (now) knows how to make his gameplay be complete experiences on their own, too. But those are given points when a lot of people talk about his games and if there's one thing I hate doing when it comes to writing, it's being redundant. It feels tedious and if other people have already expressed the exact same views I have about something, chances are pretty high that they've done so at least as well as I could. Such are the sorts of roadblocks I tend to run into when deciding whether to review a game I played that didn't come out that same year.
 
That's usually not the case with more obscure releases and why I'm more consistent covering them in review form when I feel the inspiration to do so. Games like Okami and Beyond Good & Evil naturally have their followings, but they're not nearly as huge as what the mainstream stuff attaches, so even when I play older stuff, I'm usually still fairly motivated to give them a review, despite their age. Unless it's absurdly old stuff like Hebereke. That game is pretty great, but dude, don't ask me to do a Famicom game review. I'm not the Angry Video Game Nerd for a reason.
 
But yeah, that brings me to my review of Valkyria Chronicles. It's an SRPG on the PS3 and a pretty great one at that. It did enough things right that I definitely intend to buy the sequel when it makes its way to the States this summer. But if I go any further than that, I'll just be repeating what I said in my review. You did just read everything I had to say on being redundant, after all, even if I'm ironically doing just that by bringing it up. Again.

Avatar image for eroticfishcake
eroticfishcake

7856

Forum Posts

7820

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By eroticfishcake

You probably haven't but have you tried out  the DLC by any chance yet?

Avatar image for pepsiman
Pepsiman

2815

Forum Posts

28072

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 28

Edited By Pepsiman
@eroticfishcake:  Finances permitting, I probably will give it a spin eventually. I could gladly give the game another whirl and may in fact do another run soon, so the DLC will probably get an inevitable playing sooner or later. I also noticed that there have been no reviews of it on here yet, so I may even do a quickie on them now that I've exhausted the main game in its own review.
Avatar image for eroticfishcake
eroticfishcake

7856

Forum Posts

7820

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By eroticfishcake
@Pepsiman:  Aye. Last time I checked the store there were about three DLC packs (minus the Hard EX mode) going at five quid each (in Europe at least). They're a little pricey for what they are but it's good stuff for the fans wanting more. If you're really stuck for cash I'd recommend Selvaria's DLC. The other's aren't so bad but they could've been more. But that aside good to see you enjoyed it.
 
By the way, if you don't mind me asking what's your PSN ID?
Avatar image for pepsiman
Pepsiman

2815

Forum Posts

28072

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 28

Edited By Pepsiman
@eroticfishcake:  Yeah, they're all $5 here, too, although they do seem to go on sale fairly often, so I may just wait for that to happen again. Do you remember how many missions Selvaria's DLC is? That's naturally the one I'm most interested in.
 
And the PSN is ChieMcYukiko, because I like being Japanese and Irish or something.
Avatar image for eroticfishcake
eroticfishcake

7856

Forum Posts

7820

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By eroticfishcake
@Pepsiman: Cheers. I'll add you later since I gotta finish up Yakuza 3 anyway. It's been a while since I've played it but I think there's about four maps but you can play two or three maps in a run. The DLC has two branches in it depending on what you do in the missions. So while you might play the same map on either paths, the objectives and difficulty will vary. Since you're using basic stock soldiers without upgrades from the main game, it's a bit of a toughie too. Either way, it's about 3-5 hours long and it's well worth the money for VC fans.
Avatar image for claude
Claude

16672

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By Claude

I haven't written a review in like, forever. I might be lazy not sure. I mean, how many people on this site played Dawn of Discovery for the Wii and PC and Endless Ocean: Blue World this year? Probably not many.

Avatar image for pepsiman
Pepsiman

2815

Forum Posts

28072

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 28

Edited By Pepsiman
@Claude: Well nobody played Blue World because we all got Red World, the superior version, to begin with. It had way cooler manta rays and platypuses and stuff. And took place on lava. I thought that was just a given.
Avatar image for claude
Claude

16672

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By Claude

I got to see a Narwhal in Blue World. Did Red World have that? I don't think so.
 

 I was there.
 I was there.
Avatar image for tiwi
Tiwi

1422

Forum Posts

1156

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Tiwi
@Claude said:
" I got to see a Narwhal in Blue World. Did Red World have that? I don't think so.
 

 I was there.
 I was there.
"
O_O 
fauk...
Avatar image for ace829
Ace829

2106

Forum Posts

758

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By Ace829
@Claude said:
" I haven't written a review in like, forever. I might be lazy not sure. I mean, how many people on this site played Dawn of Discovery for the Wii and PC and Endless Ocean: Blue World this year? Probably not many. "
I actually played Endless Ocean for the Wii. I haven't played it much though so a review probably won't happen for a while. It does look very pretty for a Wii game.