How can one argue against circular logic? It cannot be done, the only way to do so is to call out your opponent on their use of circular logic. This is how things generally play out. But the second they attempt to leave that comfortable niche that is "Circular Logic", you get a tangent of incomprehensible sentences and invention of facts to support their claim. For evolution, you hear that there aren't records of Macroevolution, they will never say Microevolution because the facts are hitting them with a sledgehammer. Well they are wrong. But for another issue that Extremist Christians love to hold on to tight is marriage and homosexuality. Bible logic tells them that "God says it is wrong, therefore, it is wrong". Even though it has been shown that God has never even mentioned the like in the original translation. In fact, there is a great Documentary called "The Bible Told Me So" which investigates the false claims made by the same Christians we speak of. But there is another thing they stick to, and that would be the Children. Christians always love to use children as a way to justify their bullshit, and it is quite sickening. We see as the Mormon Church spends over 25 million dollars to fund an ad campaign that focuses on children, and their education.

Note that last one, their education. As seen in the dozens of ads, the children go to see their parents and say "Guess what I've learved today", which is pretty stupid. They focus their attention on this one book,"a King and a King" which is the story of two princes who need to find a princess to become the heir of their kingdoms. They compromise and fall in love with each other. Anyways, the ad which is named "It's already happened" uses that and a court case in one of the states which allows same-sex marriage. You probably ask, how are the two connected? Well they aren't. The local PTA (With parents consent) had decided that they did not want to teach children anti-gay bigotry. Apparently one group of parents did not care enough about their child's education to look into this and decided to sue the shool board. The case was thrown out because the parents had be neglegent about their child's education and should have opposed to this. Besides, they had the right to take their kids elsewhere. Doesn't anyone else find that distasteful? To promote an false idea of moral superiority but then go lower than a sack of shit.

But as the title asks, how do you teach homosexuality. I find that the only way to answer that is to answer this other question. How do we teach heterosexuality? It's a simple question, but there is no answer. So that entire idea that children are being harmed is completely debunked. Especially when homosexuality is an irreversable trait, and cannot be contracted.

The last thing to mention is the notion of a "Gay Agenda"... is there anything to say about it? Who is stupid enough to believe that gays want to rule the world by turning everything gay? To know the answer, just look at the viewership (Technically listenners) of Michael "Weiner" Savage. You constantly hear from the insane right-wing pundits (Excluding Mike Huckabee, who has his own show on Fox) that gays are the downfall of society. Where does this come by, well since everything is circular for these people, it goes straight back to the Bible. With Sodom and Gommorah, the story of hospitality, and not how gays are evil. Amazing.