@mems1224 said:
As a huge battlefield fan the trailer didn't do anything for me. After Hardline and Battlefront this isn't what I wanted from the next proper battlefield game. I'm still willing to wait for gameplay before I make up my mind but my initial gut reaction is that I want no part of this. WW1 just doesn't seem like an interesting setting and neither does the new emphasis on melee weapons
I'm pretty sure there'll be more than enough guns and explosives in the game to make it more "interesting". The more than 15 million people that died in those 4 years weren't all killed by shovels and sharp sticks after all.
Bear in mind also that it was a global conflict so the opportunities for incredibly varied locales are high. I doubt it'll be solely concentrating on the trenches of the better known places like the Somme and Flanders. There's even a shot of a desert in the trailer with a cavalry charge, for goodness sake. (Which should provide an answer to the people I hear asking "Why did they shoe-horn an 'African American' man onto the cover?")
Also remember that there were fierce aerial and naval battles going on as well (some of the largest naval battles ever seen in fact) that even included submarines and aircraft carriers. Not to mention the tanks, massive railguns and artillery batteries, armoured cars, zeppelins, manned balloons used as spotting positions (that'll probably be this game's UAV analogue), catapult grenade launchers(!), flamethrowers etc. etc.
Basically, what I'm saying is that I think DICE can probably be trusted to, at the very least, create a game that involves a lot more than just running down a trench and hitting the enemy with a spiked club.
I, for one, am more than a little intrigued to find out what they come up with.
Log in to comment