Something went wrong. Try again later

x7eleven

This user has not updated recently.

50 0 1 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Ridiculous behaviour or how you treat "gamer girls"

In general, girls and games are pretty rare combination.This particular population is increasing,which is a good thing but girls tend to get much more attention than they deserve. Should I care with whom Im playing: male or female - i want to shoot their face equally. This thing grabbed my attention long time ago however I did not want to write about it since I have better things to do with my life,but now I dont.

Yesterday I was watching team fortress 2 "celebrity" showmatch. Idea is simple: get known people to play team fortress, known people from all sort of different sections: starting from Valve developers to famous youtubers. Guess what ? They had special place for gamer girls thus making "gamer girls" special sector of population, making it more priviliged. By making that move, organaiser showed disrespect to loyal fans, male gamers. In principle,girls can not be loyal. I felt inferior. No,I`m just kidding... but I think everyone should be equal. Apparently,they dont think the same way.

Long time ago,when life was not a huge torture,but a journey in hopes of conquering Lineage 2 world I have noticed that manhood showed special attention to people who pretented to be or for real were girls. Either way there is no way they could have known. Helping do quests,giving items etc. Really ? But why ? It is not like you gonna get her to sleep with you. Why bother? Are you that desperate or primitive ? Virtual attention of virtual girl ( who knows who is behind the screen) gonna make your self esteem grow ? Is it going to help to "break ice" in socialisation with opposite gender?

No matter who you are : Megan Fox,Michael Sheen, Lady Gaga in game you are just virtual unit to me. Middle finger in the air if you dont care who are you playing with.

117 Comments

Whats is wrong with people?

DO NOT read if you have not finished game and dont want ending (kinda) spoilt.

So I have finished mass effect 3 and saw notorious ending which isnt that bad except for the fact,that it negates everything you have done in a trilogy? Does it? I highly doubt that it does, since for me mass effect trilogy is all about characters. Would it really be interesting if Garrus,Thane,Jack( my passion) had not been there? Ending did not took the enjoyment I have got out of all side stories, even out of the main story. It was good enough even though we did not get epic fight between reapers and united galaxy as was implied at the begining of the game. So what ? Would 5 minutes of cutscenes have satisfied you? And the catalyst stuff was pretty wicked, if you asked me. Much better than " the last fight" .Unfortunetely after credits ending with father and son was kind of sad since it could have been so much better, for instance: I got good ending and chose to take control of the reapers and consequencies of that was : destroyed mass relays. What if after credits sequence would have been like that: same good old father telling stories to his son, but this time in far distant future like in 3670 years after events of mass effects and remembering Shepard basically as legend who stood and saved the galaxy, as a myth similar to Romulas and Remus ( founders of Rome).

Now if we are complaining about ending in mass effect 3, maybe we should start complaining about all of the bad games that are out there. Why dont we sue Peter Molyneux for not delivering what he has promised and I am sure, if that was the case we would not have seen fable series at all. Why dont we sue ubisoft guys for making far cry 2 so shitty and tedious? Also Mcdonalds for making me fat.

P.S. Vincent, your sunflowers suck , give my money back.

22 Comments