The game is out today and none of the major gaming sites have put out a review, what gives?
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest
Game » consists of 9 releases. Released Jan 13, 2009
A multiplayer action game developed by Pandemic Studios set in the Lord of the Rings universe.
Where in the fuck are all of the reviews?
well shit the Block Buster and Walmart near me both have it in, the only question I have is it worth buying or should I spend the money on a bag of chronic.
"Screw the reviews, how about the game. All the stores around me here in Canada still don't have it. What's the point of a release date anyway? To me it's the day I have to start calling every store in the area twice a day everyday until I find it."That is also known as "obsessing". ;)
"DOUBLESHOCK said:my precious..."Screw the reviews, how about the game. All the stores around me here in Canada still don't have it. What's the point of a release date anyway? To me it's the day I have to start calling every store in the area twice a day everyday until I find it."That is also known as "obsessing". ;)"
Wow, only the PS3 versions has reviews listed on MC... and only by 4 sites (two of them are IGN and GS). Really surprised... and the game has no word of mouth whatsoever. I haven't seen a single forum post about it on the sites I troll.
It's possible that EA didn't send out review copies, so nobody had a review ready in advance. That would mean they're all starting the game now, and it'll take a couple days for reviews.
maybe because everybody knows the game sucks ass. and i definitely saw the ign review so there are reviews out there. and no reason to put fuck in the title of the thread.
"maybe because everybody knows the game sucks ass. and i definitely saw the ign review so there are reviews out there. and no reason to put fuck in the title of the thread. "I assume the review wasn't up yet at the time this was originally written.
LOL@ the IGN review which basically says "game is ok, but would have been better if it had new ideas"
6.0Gameplay
Redundant gameplay isn't helped by fairly unimaginative design. This game could have been much more had it expanded on the established formula to push the franchise in fun, new directions.
ya think IGN? What an amazing analysis that mediocre game could have been better if it had new cool ideas in it... imagine they get PAID to write that slop.
Imagine what a groundbreaking notion from this IGN writer, the game
"could have been better if it was fun"
SHOCKING!
"MetaCriticHere's the word of mouth, don't step in the water.
Wow, only the PS3 versions has reviews listed on MC... and only by 4 sites (two of them are IGN and GS). Really surprised... and the game has no word of mouth whatsoever. I haven't seen a single forum post about it on the sites I troll."
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment