Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

118 Comments

Hey, You Should Read This: Sony Responds to Congress

Evidence of hacker group Anonymous found in one of the attacks.


Sony's answers to Congress spanned eight pages, with plenty of new details on the attack.
Sony's answers to Congress spanned eight pages, with plenty of new details on the attack.
When Congress knocks, you answer. Sony has filed their response to a subcommittee inquiry regarding the PlayStation Network security intrusion, which I've spent the morning reading through and pulling the most relevant details.

The company has continued to face criticism over waiting several days to inform consumers about the intrusion on their personal data. Early in the document, PlayStation executive Kaz Hirai answered that critique directly.

"Sony Network Entertainment America immediately hired a highly regarded information technology firm and supplemented that firm with additional expertise and resources over several days," explained Hirai. "Sony Network Entertainment then released information to its customers we we and those experts believed that information was sufficiently confirmed. The truth is that retracing the steps of experienced cyber attackers is a highly complex process that takes time to carry out effectively."

Hirai's answers provide an update on the evidence Sony has against the intruders. The popular theory has been infamous hacker organization Anonymous, who declared their intentions to disrupt Sony's operations, following a lawsuit against hacker GeoHot, who essentially cracked the PlayStation code. Anonymous had publicly distanced itself from the PSN debacle, but Sony points to tangible evidence.

== TEASER =="When Sony Online Entertainment discovered this past Sunday afternoon that data from its servers had been stolen," said Hirai, "it also discovered that the intrduers had planted a file on one of the servers named 'Anonymous' with the words 'We are Legion.'" 

Asked point blank whether it had positively identified the intruders, however, the company could not.

According to Sony's timeline, the hackers--possibly Anonymous--gained access while its servers were experiencing denial of service attacks. The company became aware on April 19 at 4:15 p.m. PST, with systems performing unscheduled reboots. Sony claims its response to the attack was slow due to the "sophistication of the intrusion" and the attack funneled through a "system software vulnerability." Sony was unable to determine whether those who gained access during the denial of service attacks were knowingly working in cahoots with the people actually perpetuating the denial of service attacks.

Sony informed the FBI on April 22. At the time, the company says it didn't know the full extent of the attack and scheduled a meeting to inform law enforcement on April 27. On April 26, Sony collected what it knew, published some details to the public and contacted regulatory agencies in states nationwide.

And while Sony still cannot rule out whether credit card information was definitely not taken, it has received no reports of mass fraud from any financial institutions assumed to be connected to PSN. The company believes 10 million credit cards were exposed but cannot determine if details were taken.

"Our forensics team have not seen queries and corresponding data transfers of the credit card information," said Hirai.

How many credit cards are even in the system? Sony says PSN account data shows 12.3 million credit cards across the 77 million registered accounts, though only 5.6 of them are here in the United States.

Sony's congressional answers represent our best look yet into the who, what, where and whys of the PSN attack. It's too bad Sony didn't make this same information available to its 77 million consumers.
Patrick Klepek on Google+

118 Comments

Avatar image for dg991
DG991

1435

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By DG991

I have a feeling anonymous was not the main force involved... but they are going to end up taking all of the blame.


If this is the case whoever did do it is very impressive... has anyone considered the Chinese? I don't really know the motivation but they are always a suspect in these situations. 


Avatar image for mraristocrates
MrAristocrates

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MrAristocrates
@mikey87144:  It's amazing how many people forget that when they complain about the removal of Other OS (which sucked anyway).
Avatar image for kerse
kerse

2496

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By kerse
@ajamafalous said:
" @HairyToeKnuckles said:
" @ajamafalous said:

" Because if someone broke into my home and left a note that said "Jeff Gerstmann was here," clearly it had to have been Jeff, right? "

God damnit! Why did Jeff do such a thing?!     "
Hey man, don't ask me. All I know is that he did it, and that he should be ashamed. "
The same thing happened to me the other night! That guy is a monster.
Avatar image for swoxx
swoxx

3050

Forum Posts

468

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By swoxx

 "Sony Network Entertainment then released information to its customers we we "

Customers penises? 


Yes, I went there
Avatar image for floope
Floope

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Floope

   
Should have got these guys.
Avatar image for punk1984
Punk1984

595

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Punk1984

After reading the letter to the hearing committee it appears that the original incursion happened while Anonymous was slam the PSN with DoS attacks. This enabled the hacker to access the system through some program malfunction. As far as this file is concerned whether Anonymous left it or the hacker left it to pin it all on Anonymous, Anonymous still helped it getting there.

Anonymous's actions during the whole GeoHot fiasco where pretty textbook cyber terrorism attacks. That coupled with this hack and leak that resulted from it. I don't see how Anonymous isn't responsible for it.
At the end of the day it could be one hacker acting alone but Anonymous helped even if they didn't know it.
Avatar image for bgrngod
Bgrngod

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bgrngod

What is the bigger debacle.. PSNHAXZR'D! or RROD?


Yuck yuck and yuck.
Avatar image for aurahack
aurahack

2561

Forum Posts

44959

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 1

Edited By aurahack

Guys:


Uplink DLC, you play as either Anonymous or Sony. Either you breach in or try and lock out the intruders.
Avatar image for quacktastic
Quacktastic

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Quacktastic

I agree with the closing sentences.  I think people would be a lot more patient if they were kept in the loop.

Avatar image for delusibeta
Delusibeta

71

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Delusibeta

And for bonus points, apparently the exploit in question was known beforehand. Heads should roll, quite frankly.

Avatar image for xeiphyer
Xeiphyer

5962

Forum Posts

1193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Xeiphyer

This is all information that was more or less released already, its just that people were too busy freaking out and being retarded to read any of it.

Avatar image for hpx
HPX

73

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By HPX

Anon wouldn't do this; they already punished them once to prove a point. I think it's easier to believe that someone just took advantage of the DoS attack, and planted that file as a means of placing the blame. Besides, something as monumental as this, Anon would definitely take credit for if it really had been them.

Avatar image for deactivated-5865c6a5c9438
deactivated-5865c6a5c9438

544

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The whole Anonymous thing seems a bit contrived to me. How can an organization without... organization claim that it wasn't responsible for something? What is the use of pinning something on a group with no apparent leader or structure?

Avatar image for generic_username
generic_username

943

Forum Posts

1494

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

Edited By generic_username
@krazy_kyle:
AGREED
Avatar image for roujinx
RoujinX

428

Forum Posts

257

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RoujinX

@blaakmawf:
Isn't that the whole point of Anonymous? That they cannot be funneled into a single controlling entity or group, and therefore operate outside of the entire structure of normal judicsiary systems?

Avatar image for majesticoverlord
MajesticOverlord

191

Forum Posts

43

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By MajesticOverlord

Imagine trying to buy something with your card only to notice that you're completely dried out and that repo men are eager to get in your home..... 

Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By SeriouslyNow
@Delusibeta said:
" And for bonus points, apparently the exploit in question was known beforehand. Heads should roll, quite frankly. "
Wow, 
Avatar image for woodenplatypus
WoodenPlatypus

1389

Forum Posts

3983

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By WoodenPlatypus


If anyone were stupid enough to purchase anything with the details it would reveal their silly mugs to the world.

I wouldnt worry if your bank details are out there, chances are they'll just buy themselves some new yu-gi-oh cards and mountain dew to take to school with them.