Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

219 Comments

Warner Bros. Insists that All Catwomen Be Paid for New and Be Connected to the Internet

Want to play those Catwoman levels in Batman: Arkham City? Then you're going to need an online pass code.

As if Warner Bros. hasn't made enough of a sport out of trying to baffle the consumer with its utterly bizarre and incomprehensible pre-order schemes for Batman: Arkham City, we can now add one more bat to the consumer's skull (albeit a far less confusing, far more obnoxious one) courtesy of Batman's publisher.

Lack broadband Internet and hate paying for new copies of games? Good luck if you want to have Catwoman.
Lack broadband Internet and hate paying for new copies of games? Good luck if you want to have Catwoman.

This latest moment of consumer grudge humping comes via today's news that the Catwoman missions contained within the game will be locked behind an online pass. Despite WB's constant hyping of the Catwoman bonus missions, you won't be able to freely access them unless you have a new copy of Arkham City, as well as an Internet-connected console. If you do pick up a copy used, you'll need to pony up $9.99 to gain access to these missions.

While the Catwoman missions aren't required to get through Arkham City's storyline, I can say having played as the character in preview builds that they're actually fun, and most definitely a perk of the game. Gamers without Internet-ready consoles are fewer and further between nowadays, but they still exist, and shockingly enough, some of them might want to play Arkham City--as Catwoman, even. As for the used players? Well, you're probably getting used to this sort of thing these days. I ask you: Where's your Occupy Wall Street movement? Where's your protest march? Where are the jobless college kids acting on your behalf?

Of course, the answer is "playing video games and writing enraged Internet comments at nobody who can actually affect change." Right then. Carry on.

Alex Navarro on Google+

219 Comments

Avatar image for zaph
Zaph

309

Forum Posts

5166

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Zaph

When are publishers going to stop all this cowardly manoeuvring and just issue CD-keys with console games? It's obvious to anyone that's the direction they're moving in.

Avatar image for jrock3x8
JRock3x8

327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By JRock3x8

the only way this garbage stops is if you all agree not to buy the game and we all know that will never happen

Avatar image for gruff182
Gruff182

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Gruff182

Fine by me.

Avatar image for onan
onan

1356

Forum Posts

8845

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 10

Edited By onan

I was under the impression that Catwoman was incorporated into the main campaign? If so this is very odd.

It does make the choice simple for non-online gamers though, just buy the game used instead and save a few bucks.

Avatar image for spartanman1222
spartanman1222

51

Forum Posts

68

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By spartanman1222

if it's on the disk, and i buy the disk, then i should have access to it. period. if they want to restrict then just make it $10 DLC. how about they make their beef with used game sales companies rather than with customers. buttholes.

Avatar image for wjist
WJist

330

Forum Posts

5087

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 7

Edited By WJist

People who buy used games can probably afford to wait a few weeks/months to play games at the rate at which retailers are discounting new titles. So much stuff comes out with coupons or promo credit that it kinda makes the online pass thing silly - my incentive to buy your game new is not necessarily the content I'm missing out on if I didn't, but the song I can get it for.

Avatar image for ninjalegend
ninjalegend

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By ninjalegend

You know, Warner Brothers, I hear Batman fights crime and injustice. So if you find yourselves haplessly wandering under some kind of gargoyle............

Avatar image for admanb
admanb

245

Forum Posts

108

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By admanb

Shocking that they would add a way to discourage used sales onto a game with no multiplayer mode.

I am shocked.

Shocked.

I'm not selling this one, am I?

Avatar image for gerhabio
Gerhabio

1996

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By Gerhabio

Sucks

Avatar image for emptycanowupass
emptycanowupass

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By emptycanowupass

Sucks for people like me who wanted to rent it....

Avatar image for stealthraptor
StealthRaptor

568

Forum Posts

32

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By StealthRaptor

I have no problem with paying money for Catwoman.

Avatar image for mewstu
mewstu

96

Forum Posts

183

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By mewstu

Whoa! Alex getting a little political at the end there.

Avatar image for sissylion
sissylion

685

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sissylion

I've never been more angry about anything in my entire life!

Avatar image for hadestimes
HadesTimes

969

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By HadesTimes

I doubt this will effect Arkham City, but if anyone tries this with a Non-AAA title, I'm guessing it will tank like the Exxon Valdez.

Avatar image for stingingvelvet
StingingVelvet

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By StingingVelvet

PC gamer says "what's a used game?"

Avatar image for vhold
vhold

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By vhold

Why does catwoman hate our freedoms?

Avatar image for wolf_blitzer85
wolf_blitzer85

5460

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By wolf_blitzer85

I AM ENRAGED!

Avatar image for picard
Picard

260

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Picard

I need play the first one, I heard it was really good. lol

Avatar image for alex
alex

3983

Forum Posts

7447

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By alex

As if Warner Bros. hasn't made enough of a sport out of trying to baffle the consumer with its utterly bizarre and incomprehensible pre-order schemes for Batman: Arkham City, we can now add one more bat to the consumer's skull (albeit a far less confusing, far more obnoxious one) courtesy of Batman's publisher.

Lack broadband Internet and hate paying for new copies of games? Good luck if you want to have Catwoman.
Lack broadband Internet and hate paying for new copies of games? Good luck if you want to have Catwoman.

This latest moment of consumer grudge humping comes via today's news that the Catwoman missions contained within the game will be locked behind an online pass. Despite WB's constant hyping of the Catwoman bonus missions, you won't be able to freely access them unless you have a new copy of Arkham City, as well as an Internet-connected console. If you do pick up a copy used, you'll need to pony up $9.99 to gain access to these missions.

While the Catwoman missions aren't required to get through Arkham City's storyline, I can say having played as the character in preview builds that they're actually fun, and most definitely a perk of the game. Gamers without Internet-ready consoles are fewer and further between nowadays, but they still exist, and shockingly enough, some of them might want to play Arkham City--as Catwoman, even. As for the used players? Well, you're probably getting used to this sort of thing these days. I ask you: Where's your Occupy Wall Street movement? Where's your protest march? Where are the jobless college kids acting on your behalf?

Of course, the answer is "playing video games and writing enraged Internet comments at nobody who can actually affect change." Right then. Carry on.