@deathstriker said:
@greggd said:
@deathstriker said:
To add more info, I am playing on console.
@veektarius said:
@deathstriker: You can totally alter your loadout through the browser-based launcher. I don't know about forming squads. I think that you will generally be assigned to the same squad as any others from a party that you joined while in the browser, but I don't believe that will necessarily make a new squad rather than assigning you to one that is already populated.
Edit: I did assume PC because that's the only sane choice.
Basically everyone I've seen (Battlefield Youtube guys and game critics) have said that the PC version and next-gen are basically the same, so that's a silly thing to say. I'll be going next-gen in a couple of weeks.
Slightly hyperbolic, for sure, but not entirely untrue. The PC version is still the best version, but at least the PS4/X1 versions will have the benefit of full headcount in multiplayer and 60fps.
Several Battlefield guys I watch (LevelCap for example) have said the PS4 and X1 versions perform like high-end PCs and all versions are more or less the same. These are PC guys and they're jobs are to basically play Battlefield for people to watch, so I'll go with their word rather than random gamers online who haven't play all the versions in question. I just see PC elitism in the prior post, not logic.
A) You sorta seem a bit pissy, but maybe that's me reading into it.
B) The PC has a lot of advantages. More controller options, including the vastly superior mouse and keyboard (seriously, playing an FPS with a mouse is a world of difference on it's own), and much sharper visuals in terms of resolution and just plain visual fidelity. And I know that the next gen versions drop some frames even on X1 and PS4, and even in MP, as a number of lucky individuals have said as much. In fact I believe Digital Foundry even did a video showing it although that may have been SP only for the video part anyway. My PC on the other hand runs it flawlessly with everything but MSAA maxed out.
That said, the next gen versions will certainly be competitive with the PC version and totally awesome. But you can't say a game that can't manage 60 at 900 vertical pixels is better than one doing it at higher settings and 1200 vertical pixels, no matter how close they are. And there are other advantages of the PC version that get more into the PC gaming lifestyle, so I'll let that be, but still. The PC version is certainly the one to get if you can.
Also, those guys are still just dudes on the internet. If you think playing a game on YouTube all the time makes someone an expert on games or even that particular game, you're dead wrong. They are good at what they do but that doesn't mean they have more answers than some nobody on the internet.
For you, the difference may not be important, but for a lot of people, PC is the only way for games like Battlefield. I can't imagine playing BF on a controller. If you want a great example of why, try playing something like Bulletstorm and look at the difference in what you can pull off with a mouse vs a controller. Assuming you're about as comfortable with either one, you'll probably be able to pull off way more on the mouse. I know I was able to, and it made the game that much more enjoyable. And in Battlefield, I can switch over to my controller for flying or driving around or whatever, then back to KB and Mouse in a second when I hop out and need to get back to fighting on my feet.
Saying "Whatever, you're just biased" is a bit silly because, well, so are you. You're biased to not care about the PC stuff, just like some of us are biased to really care about those things. No one's saying you can't enjoy the console versions of the game or anything :)
Log in to comment