Here we go again: 1080p on PS4, 900p on Xbox One

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Earlier this month, Digital Foundry confirmed that the Xbox One version runs in 900p:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-hands-on-with-cod-advanced-warfare-multiplayer

As played at this year's Gamescom and EGX on Xbox One, multiplayer in Advanced Warfare is a very different beast to the work-in-progress Seoul campaign mission shown at Microsoft's E3 event.

...

Running at a native 1600x900 at both events (a boost from the E3-era 882p), little has changed to Xbox One's rendering setup for multiplayer, suggesting this number is a lock for all modes in the final release.

...

Opaque panels now line the screen's edges, showing the map, bullet counter and target points - rendered in the same pass as the actual gameplay. To our pixel count, these element are upscaled from the same 900p base resolution as the core gunplay - a mix-up for a series which, until now, delivered HUDs at the highest resolution possible, independent of the 3D rendering side.

Meanwhile, a NeoGAF member recently posted a direct feed image of the PS4 version, which was then confirmed to be 1080p native. Of course, the Xbox One version could get a day one update that would increase the resolution, but with the game's release only four days away, I have to think that we would have heard that announcement by now.

Avatar image for hunkulese
Hunkulese

4225

Forum Posts

310

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Here we go again with meaningless numbers.

Avatar image for thelastgunslinger
thelastgunslinger

619

Forum Posts

86

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 9

Has anyone seen the damn I'm supposed to give? I can't find it anywhere.

I just want to play the game. I really hope the pre-release footage and info isn't misleading and Sledgehammer has succeed and giving the series a much needed kick in the pants.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

#4  Edited By Yummylee

Eh. Framerate differences is what really counts far as I'm concerned, and I imagine both versions in that regard will be pretty comparable if not the exact same.

Avatar image for amikron
Amikron

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

1080p doesn't really mean much if it doesn't run at least passably smooth...

Avatar image for john1912
John1912

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Its so hard to tell 900 from 1080. If the overall texture quality remains the same there really isnt a reason to care. Overall quality is much more important then 720p-900p-1080p.

Avatar image for giantlizardking
GiantLizardKing

1144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By GiantLizardKing

The reason to complain about this should largely go away now that the xbo is fifty dollars cheaper than the PS4. Sure it's less powerful, it's a cheaper console. That's not to say that it will go away. That definitely won't happen.

Avatar image for rangers517
rangers517

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

That's good. Parity sucks. 1080 is native resolution for most modern day tv's. No upscaling is always better.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

@giantlizardking said:

The reason to complain about this should largely go away now that the xbo is fifty dollars cheaper than the PS4. Sure it's less powerful, it's a cheaper console. That's not to say that it will go away. That definitely won't happen.

In the UK they're still the same price as one another, least on Amazon. Matter of fact a regular PS4 is £4 cheaper than a regular XB1.

Avatar image for steadying
Steadying

1902

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Honestly I wish games on consoles were just 720p and tried for 60fps. You could probably even make the actual graphics prettier if you did that. So disappointed devs are always going for the highest resolution they can reach, especially since the consoles clearly don't handle it well. So tired of games barely running at even 30fps most of the time.

Avatar image for amikron
Amikron

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@steadying: BUT 1080 IS A HIGHER NUMBER THAN 720! THAT MEANS IT IS BETTER!

Avatar image for steadying
Steadying

1902

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@amikron: WELL SHIT THAT'S TRUE, NEVER MIND ME

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#13  Edited By notnert427

That 180p is critical. What's most important to me is pausing a game, taking a screenshot, zooming in on a blade of grass, and going back and forth between that and another screenshot with slightly more p for several minutes squinting to try and figure out if the blade of grass might look marginally better on the one with more p. That's gaming in its purest form.

Avatar image for deactivated-6050ef4074a17
deactivated-6050ef4074a17

3686

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If it doesn't matter to you, then that's fine. It matters to some people, however, and I don't see the need for some people to be dismissive and sarcastic about it. Technical specs are important and worth discussing.

Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
SpaceInsomniac

6353

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Honestly I wish games on consoles were just 720p and tried for 60fps. You could probably even make the actual graphics prettier if you did that. So disappointed devs are always going for the highest resolution they can reach, especially since the consoles clearly don't handle it well. So tired of games barely running at even 30fps most of the time.

Agreed. Having 60fps is way more important to me. Give me a smooth frame rate and then whatever resolution your game can handle. Thankfully, COD is always a 60fps game. Now that You Tube allows 60fps video, it should help developers and publishers take frame rate a lot more seriously.

Avatar image for aurahack
aurahack

2561

Forum Posts

44959

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 1

#16  Edited By aurahack

Don't worry, you guys. They have a day-one patch that'll achieve parity on both consoles and PC. They even released a screenshot of the improved™ experience.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for corevi
Corevi

6796

Forum Posts

391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Ok. The Xbox One is a weaker console and they shouldn't hold back the PS4 version because of it.

Avatar image for shinjin977
shinjin977

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

the x1 is cheaper now so i dont see the need for this anymore. You get what you pay for.

Avatar image for sterling
Sterling

4134

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#19  Edited By Sterling

Has anyone seen the damn I'm supposed to give? I can't find it anywhere.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

What is this, System Wars?