#1 Posted by LordXavierBritish (6320 posts) -

Completely ignoring bull shit like the Wind-up Hunter loop and hitting random Synchro-centric monsters like Spore and T.G. Striker for no reason.

Could this spell disaster for other Konami properties going forward?


#2 Posted by Hizang (8532 posts) -

I have nothing more to add to this topic other than I just unlocked him in Peace Walker as a playable dude.

#3 Posted by ImmortalSaiyan (4698 posts) -

I feel as if this thread was written for a specific audience and i'm not part of it.

#4 Posted by JackSukeru (5946 posts) -

I like frogs.

I want more frogs.

#5 Posted by Freezer_Burn (207 posts) -

Yu-Gi-Oh, I believe. Konami having the license, and Synchro monsters being a thing in Yu-Gi-Oh. But any of this is way past my time and knowledge of the card game.

Is it really them to blame? Do they own Yu-Gi-Oh in it's entirety or just make the games?

If so, how dare they do what you're talking about.

#6 Posted by Hailinel (25201 posts) -

Unless this is a Yu-Gi-Oh thread, I am completely lost.

#7 Posted by MB (12911 posts) -

Why is this in Off Topic? Does anyone know what is going on here?

#8 Posted by JackSukeru (5946 posts) -

@MB: OP was bored and thought it would be funny to start a thread with some random Yu-Gi-Oh lingo to see how it confused people?

I still want more frog cards, they're the best.

#9 Posted by Cincaid (2959 posts) -

@MB said:

Does anyone know what is going on here?

Hold me, I'm scared. :(

#10 Posted by kafu288 (15 posts) -

I think... that maybe, this is about Yu-Gi-Oh... To which I would point out that this is a card game based on a tv show in which the cards are based on ancient egypt and have the ability to cause doom and destruction and end the world, and the main character is a kid who is possessed by the spirit of an ancient Egyptian warlord (I think) and that's not even in the top 5 for messed up characters so... why is it worth complaining about?

#11 Posted by PeasantAbuse (5138 posts) -

My elementary school banned Pokemon cards, that was really lame.

#12 Posted by Phatmac (5726 posts) -

What is going on here?

#13 Posted by Hot_Karl (3309 posts) -

This has nothing to do with the topic, but it's not like the OP wanted positive discussion anyway.

#14 Posted by LordXavierBritish (6320 posts) -

@VinceNotVance said:

This has nothing to do with the topic, but it's not like the OP wanted positive discussion anyway.

Correct, this is nothing positive to discuss.

There is only pain and suffering to be had as everyone starts maining D.D. Crow and silently broods over long forgotten times when things were simpler and it wasn't necessary to adapt Macro Anti-meta to your archetype just so you could compete with the new hotness.