Hey duders,
I'm a 21 year old currently going to Virginia Tech (Go, Hokies!). I have a year and half, maybe two years left before I get a degree in Business Information Technology. I have NO student loans, at all. My degree makes me a business technology consultant, I would work for a company like KPMG (a company that my father and grand-father both worked at), or in a variety of fields. The minimum starting salary is 70k (I have quite a few older friends who have gotten 90k out the gate). I doing well, not spectacular, but well. I'm a 3.2 gpa student and am on the school triathlon team. I have a current plan to help set me apart from the pack as far as recruiting is concerned so that I can get that sweet starting salary. This where I'd like some input.
the business school hosts two large and several small business fairs a year. companies visit weekly and I notice several things. Everyone competes on the same three things: gpa, internships, and other experience. My dad and grand-father told me that recruiters like these three things in a candidate, in general. But if you really want to set yourself apart, show your about it. Meaning that you're not just learning this but you can put your own spin on it and have the ability to look forward. I make a joke at these recruiting things where I go, "Is this the part where I tell you I'm an enthusiastic, hard-working, team-player?", after the hand shake and names. It kills without fail so I know that on some level, they know the clique and on some level know that everyone is running the same gammit. My plan is simple, start the rat race on a horse and ten steps ahead.
I took the time to make a trademarked document where I enumerate the path that consultancy positions should take up. I posit that companies in the very near future will have to come to grips with environmental and societal that they are wholly unprepared for. They will have to air so much dirty laundry that if they are caught with their pants down they will stand to lose money hand over fist. I go further by saying that if corporations can be held in legal regards as people, than they can be analyzed on a psychological level and have conscious and sub-conscious motivations. I go on to cover a means to effectively psychoanalyze a business and find hidden biases that wouldn't pass the scrutiny of an unrelenting public when it comes to social justice. I also have gone the extra step and have begun drafting equations to take social and environmental consciounability into account, letting you mathmatically prove that a project would be imperically harmful to undertake. Again all this is copy-written and you better bet your bottom dollar a recruiter will know that.
I hope that this will show, "Hey, this guy might have a 4.0 but I have vision and knowledge that surpasses his by leaps and bounds. Who's more valuable?". What do you guys think? Will this strategy work out in my favor? Will I at least get noticed and stand out if I have trademarked materials? Thanks for time duders, and have a great holiday.
TLDR: Would a recruiter think more of me if I had decent/good grades and trade marked material that was relevant to my industry?
Log in to comment