Both are mysterious, but only one was real. Even though they are similar, does the fictionality aspect of dragons (breathing fire, for example) trump the realism of dinosaurs in making them a more interesting subject? Or does the fact that dragons are fictional make them more interesting than dinosaurs?
Also as always this can be interpreted how you will, so if you're answer is because you want to study paleontology and that's why dinosaurs are cooler so be it. But the question is quite simply, which you find more interesting.
I voted dinosaurs, because they're past is true, and because there are so many different types. When you think about it, it blows your mind. Dragons are awesome though, so it's a tough choice.
" Dinosaurs are like dragons, except they're real, so that automatically makes them more interesting. Also, please stop posting these things until you can come up with better questions. "
Negative. I have different types of questions, from fun to serious. this is a stupid question. = fun.
Dinosaurs because they were real and Dragons, as cool as they may be, are fiction. Although when I found out that scientists now believe that raptors were covered in feathers and looked more like big chickens then what we saw in Jurassic Park they kind of lost a little something.
Log in to comment