It struck me as I was replaying a second play through of the game that Max is a very flawed person. If you remove all the small choices you can make for her within that game she is on balance decent person. Yet... she has one defining past action that is REALLY regrettable that reveal what I think is her deepest character flaw.
When she moves away she never contacts Chloe. This was her best friend. She hung ot at Chloe's house. She was a familiar face to her mother and father. Moreover, Chloe's father seems to be one of the adults in Max's life that stood out.
In that game narrative, correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears Max knew Chloe's father had passed away too. That fact about Chloe was not a surprise to Max at all. So it appears Max never contacted Chloe and possibly even when she knew Chloe's father had passed she didn't even contact her then. Max is not evil or even bad, but I would have to say that sort of behavior is cruel. Its cruelty through cowardice because there seems to be no real reason to ditch Chloe, and when give opportunity to contact she does not, she chooses not to do that.
- I think if I were Chloe I would be far more angry, and while I think Chloe is angry, I think the reality would be to REALLY hate Max.
Notes On the game:
I really think this game is use the concept of misdirection with characters. Kate Marsh, Warren Graham, and Stella Hill are not as clean and nice as they seem. In fat a lot of those students give me a bad vibe.
Bottomline: I think there are at least six or seven student characters who KNOW what happened to Rachel Amber and/or are responsible (in full or in part) for her disappearance. I think the paranoid angry stepfather/security guard is probably that one who gives a damn about stopping whatever nefarious bullshit those students are pulling.
Log in to comment