18 Comments
Posted by Morningstar

Good dog?

Edited by InternetFamous

Dat lengthy preamble.

Also...Patrick. The upload has none of Alex's audio.

Edited by DrZewo

I cant hear Alex's audio.

Posted by fetterdave

Conversation seems a little one-sided.

Posted by lesaboteur

Is it just me, I can't hear Alex on this broadcast at all.

Posted by Sidewinder23

I think the Alex is broke. You need to reboot your co-host, Patrick.

Posted by csl316

Maybe Alex left, but Patrick refuses to believe it and just kept going.

Posted by fetterdave

Wait, has Alex been a figment of Patrick's imagination THIS WHOLE TIME?!?

Posted by Ford_Dent

I don't know why, but I feel like I'm missing out on half the conversation here...

Edited by Chuck_

what the heck is this?! :/

Edited by Yarbles

Sounds like they've fixed the audio now

Posted by TheMasterDS

Audio is fucked. I can't listen to this, I hope SGDQ is mentioned in this.

Posted by Chuck_

guess it works now so redownload everyone

@patrickklepek it would be cool if you and alex would sometimes remember that a lot of people just listen to the podcast, and cannot actually see when one of you guys says "look at this!"

Edited by HeyGuys

You're thinking of Girl Talk.

Edit: Never mind you got it. Also totally seems like Phil Fish is looking for a fight sometimes.

Edited by AngriGhandi

You know, it should be said off the top that it's a pretty strange concept that people make any money off of the videos they upload to Youtube at all (historically/economically speaking). That said, I feel like a reasonable model for Youtube revenue sharing on game-related videos would be something like:

-Edited videos which use short gameplay clips as part of their larger point (eg: Supercuts, Game Reviews) - fair use, all money goes to Youtuber

-Long form videos with commentary (eg: Let's Plays, Quick Looks) - 66/33 split, Youtuber gets most of it

-Long form gameplay without commentary - 50/50 split

-Non-gameplay cutscene without commentary - Youtuber gets 33% and is grateful they even get that

Rights holders get to place revenue sharing claims instead of takedown requests, and the uploader gets to decide if they want to take the deal or just take the video down.

It'd be really interesting to see what most of them choose.

Posted by csl316

Oh, the Marty...

My buddy Marty owns a Marty and thinks it's the best shit ever.

Edited by colorbrandon

So no watchdogs talk? Huh.™

Posted by MrMazz